LAPSE:2024.0354
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.0354
Numerical Investigation on Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Alternating CO2 Flooding
June 5, 2024
Abstract
For over four decades, carbon dioxide (CO2) has been instrumental in enhancing oil extraction through advanced recovery techniques. One such method, water alternating gas (WAG) injection, while effective, grapples with limitations like gas channeling and gravity segregation. To tackle the aforementioned issues, this paper proposes an upgrade coupling method named alkaline-surfactant-polymer alternating gas (ASPAG). ASP flooding and CO2 are injected alternately into the reservoir to enhance the recovery of the WAG process. The uniqueness of this method lies in the fact that polymers could help profile modification, CO2 would miscible mix with oil, and alkaline surfactant would reduce oil−water interfacial tension (IFT). To analyze the feasibility of ASPAG, a couples model considering both gas flooding and ASP flooding processes is established by using the CMG-STARS (Version 2021) to study the performance of ASPAG and compare the recovery among ASPAG, WAG, and ASP flooding. Our research delved into the ASPAG’s adaptability across reservoirs varying in average permeability, interlayer heterogeneity, formation rhythmicity, and fluid properties. Key findings include that ASPAG surpasses the conventional WAG in sweep and displacement efficiency, elevating oil recovery by 12−17%, and in comparison to ASP, ASPAG bolsters displacement efficiency, leading to a 9−11% increase in oil recovery. The primary flooding mechanism of ASPAG stems from the ASP slug’s ability to diminish the interfacial tension, enhancing the oil and water mobility ratio, which is particularly efficient in medium-high permeability layers. Through sensitivity analysis, ASPAG is best suited for mid-high-permeability reservoirs characterized by low crude oil viscosity and a composite reverse sedimentary rhythm. This study offers invaluable insights into the underlying mechanisms and critical parameters that influence the alkaline-surfactant-polymer alternating gas method’s success for enhanced oil recovery. Furthermore, it unveils an innovative strategy to boost oil recovery in medium-to-high-permeability reservoirs.
For over four decades, carbon dioxide (CO2) has been instrumental in enhancing oil extraction through advanced recovery techniques. One such method, water alternating gas (WAG) injection, while effective, grapples with limitations like gas channeling and gravity segregation. To tackle the aforementioned issues, this paper proposes an upgrade coupling method named alkaline-surfactant-polymer alternating gas (ASPAG). ASP flooding and CO2 are injected alternately into the reservoir to enhance the recovery of the WAG process. The uniqueness of this method lies in the fact that polymers could help profile modification, CO2 would miscible mix with oil, and alkaline surfactant would reduce oil−water interfacial tension (IFT). To analyze the feasibility of ASPAG, a couples model considering both gas flooding and ASP flooding processes is established by using the CMG-STARS (Version 2021) to study the performance of ASPAG and compare the recovery among ASPAG, WAG, and ASP flooding. Our research delved into the ASPAG’s adaptability across reservoirs varying in average permeability, interlayer heterogeneity, formation rhythmicity, and fluid properties. Key findings include that ASPAG surpasses the conventional WAG in sweep and displacement efficiency, elevating oil recovery by 12−17%, and in comparison to ASP, ASPAG bolsters displacement efficiency, leading to a 9−11% increase in oil recovery. The primary flooding mechanism of ASPAG stems from the ASP slug’s ability to diminish the interfacial tension, enhancing the oil and water mobility ratio, which is particularly efficient in medium-high permeability layers. Through sensitivity analysis, ASPAG is best suited for mid-high-permeability reservoirs characterized by low crude oil viscosity and a composite reverse sedimentary rhythm. This study offers invaluable insights into the underlying mechanisms and critical parameters that influence the alkaline-surfactant-polymer alternating gas method’s success for enhanced oil recovery. Furthermore, it unveils an innovative strategy to boost oil recovery in medium-to-high-permeability reservoirs.
Record ID
Keywords
alkaline-surfactant-polymer alternating gas (ASPAG), ASP, chemical flooding, EOR, gas flooding
Subject
Suggested Citation
Li W, Wei X, Wang Z, Liu W, Ding B, Dong Z, Pan X, Lin K, Yi H. Numerical Investigation on Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Alternating CO2 Flooding. (2024). LAPSE:2024.0354
Author Affiliations
Li W: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Wei X: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Wang Z: Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100086, China
Liu W: Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100086, China
Ding B: Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100086, China
Dong Z: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Pan X: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Lin K: College of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China [ORCID]
Yi H: Petrochina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin 124000, China
Wei X: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Wang Z: Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100086, China
Liu W: Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100086, China
Ding B: Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100086, China
Dong Z: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Pan X: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
Lin K: College of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China [ORCID]
Yi H: Petrochina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin 124000, China
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
12
Issue
5
First Page
916
Year
2024
Publication Date
2024-04-29
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr12050916, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2024.0354
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12050916
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
250
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 5, 2024
Verified by curator on
Jun 5, 2024
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2024.0354
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
