LAPSE:2023.8473
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.8473
A Novel Experimental Study on Conductivity Evaluation of Intersected Fractures
February 24, 2023
Abstract
Massive hydraulic fracturing (MHF) is currently the most effective technology used to create fracture networks with sufficient conductivity and maximize the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) in tight oil and gas reservoirs. The newly initiated fracture networks during MHF usually exhibit complex fracture morphology and contain intersected fractures and fracture branches. The conductivity of these fractures plays a pivotal role in determining long-term productivity. Due to the complex geometry, it is difficult to accurately evaluate intersected fracture conductivity through traditional conductivity measurement methods and devices which are designed for a single primary fracture. Unlike previous studies where fracture conductivity was measured using two rock slabs under single-direction (vertical) loading, we establish a novel conductivity measurement apparatus that can mimic different fracture intersection scenarios under both vertical and transverse loading to facilitate the evaluation of intersected fracture conductivity. Based on this apparatus, a standard conductivity measurement framework for intersected fractures under biaxial compaction conditions is also proposed, and stable and reliable conductivity testing data are obtained. Sensitivity analyses are performed to find out the controlling factors of intersected fracture conductivity and the corresponding conductivity evolution law. Results indicate that the overall intersected fracture conductivity of intersected fractures can be divided into three stages, with closure pressure increasing, videlicet, the conductivity rapid reduction stage at low closure pressure, the conductivity slow reduction stage, and the conductivity stabilization stage. Higher proppant concentration results in higher conductivity. However, the conductivity differences among cases with different proppant concentration are relatively small at high closure pressure (conductivity stabilization stage). The more complex the fracture intersecting pattern is, the higher the conductivity would be. The experimental results can provide guidance for the design of proppant placement procedure for intersected fractures.
Massive hydraulic fracturing (MHF) is currently the most effective technology used to create fracture networks with sufficient conductivity and maximize the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) in tight oil and gas reservoirs. The newly initiated fracture networks during MHF usually exhibit complex fracture morphology and contain intersected fractures and fracture branches. The conductivity of these fractures plays a pivotal role in determining long-term productivity. Due to the complex geometry, it is difficult to accurately evaluate intersected fracture conductivity through traditional conductivity measurement methods and devices which are designed for a single primary fracture. Unlike previous studies where fracture conductivity was measured using two rock slabs under single-direction (vertical) loading, we establish a novel conductivity measurement apparatus that can mimic different fracture intersection scenarios under both vertical and transverse loading to facilitate the evaluation of intersected fracture conductivity. Based on this apparatus, a standard conductivity measurement framework for intersected fractures under biaxial compaction conditions is also proposed, and stable and reliable conductivity testing data are obtained. Sensitivity analyses are performed to find out the controlling factors of intersected fracture conductivity and the corresponding conductivity evolution law. Results indicate that the overall intersected fracture conductivity of intersected fractures can be divided into three stages, with closure pressure increasing, videlicet, the conductivity rapid reduction stage at low closure pressure, the conductivity slow reduction stage, and the conductivity stabilization stage. Higher proppant concentration results in higher conductivity. However, the conductivity differences among cases with different proppant concentration are relatively small at high closure pressure (conductivity stabilization stage). The more complex the fracture intersecting pattern is, the higher the conductivity would be. The experimental results can provide guidance for the design of proppant placement procedure for intersected fractures.
Record ID
Keywords
complex fracture, conductivity, conductivity measurement, unconventional reservoir
Subject
Suggested Citation
Wang H, Chen C, Yao Y, Zhao J, Zeng Q, Lu C. A Novel Experimental Study on Conductivity Evaluation of Intersected Fractures. (2023). LAPSE:2023.8473
Author Affiliations
Wang H: State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China; SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
Chen C: State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China; SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
Yao Y: State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China; SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
Zhao J: CNPC Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company Shale Gas Research Institute, Chengdu 610051, China; State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Zeng Q: State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Lu C: State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China [ORCID]
Chen C: State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China; SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
Yao Y: State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China; SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
Zhao J: CNPC Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company Shale Gas Research Institute, Chengdu 610051, China; State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Zeng Q: State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Lu C: State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
21
First Page
8170
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-11-02
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15218170, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.8473
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218170
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
204
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 24, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 24, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.8473
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.34 seconds)
