Abstract
Most old oil and gas fields worldwide are depleted, making drilling in these sedimentary zones extremely difficult, especially in complex pore pressure regimes when they are accompanied by over-pressure zones. Considering that typical wellbore stability studies provide a conservative mud density curve to prevent wellbore failure, dynamic geomechanical approaches are required to provide more flexible and manageable drilling in such complex cases in order to address anticipated drilling obstacles. This study aims to apply the more dynamic concept, known as “depth of damage” (DOD), in the El Morgan oil field, Gulf of Suez Basin, to deliver a more optional mud density window that helps in the safe drilling of different pore pressure regimes within the area, as well as the implications of applying this drilling strategy in the studied basin. In this paper, well logging and downhole measurements were used to develop a 1D geomechanical earth model and infer the in situ stresses in the studied boreholes, and the modified Lade failure criterion was used to conduct the wellbore stability analysis. The study revealed that the El Morgan sedimentary succession has a complex and varied pore pressure regime. Applying the DOD approach introduces multiple mud density scenarios that can lead to successful drilling and avoid unexpected incidents while drilling. The key benefit of the DOD approach is that it widens the safe mud density window to be less than the shear failure with an acceptable amount of failure. This study provides insights into unconventional techniques such as underbalanced drilling techniques that can be used under manageable conditions in mature basins. Furthermore, the DOD approach is compared to the conventional wellbore stability analysis or breakout depth approach, and the main differences, merits, and demerits of each were discussed in this study.