LAPSE:2023.8087
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.8087
Low-Carbon Retrofitting Path of Existing Public Buildings: A Comparative Study Based on Green Building Rating Systems
February 24, 2023
Abstract
Existing building carbon emissions contribute to global climate change significantly. Various Green Building Rating Systems (GBRS) have considered low-carbon requirements to regulate the emissions. Low-carbon retrofitting is an important way to reduce existing building CO2 emissions. However, low-carbon retrofitting of existing public buildings is not sufficient and systematic, and there is a lack of research on low-carbon retrofitting from the perspective of GBRS. The purpose of this study is to propose a carbon emission control framework for existing public buildings based on GBRS analysis and guide the low-carbon retrofitting. This study makes comparisons among the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), Green Mark (GM), and Assessment Standard for Green Retrofitting of Existing Buildings (ASGREB). A low-carbon retrofit pathway for existing public buildings is proposed from the GBRS research for the first time, encompassing six aspects: materials, energy, management, innovation, site, and water, involving 15 measures. Among them, measures on energy and materials are the main considerations, with weights of 18.3% and 17.7%, respectively. Six recommendations for implementation pathways are also given. Furthermore, the necessary measures, the importance of local context and quantification, priorities of materials, and energy scopes are defined.
Existing building carbon emissions contribute to global climate change significantly. Various Green Building Rating Systems (GBRS) have considered low-carbon requirements to regulate the emissions. Low-carbon retrofitting is an important way to reduce existing building CO2 emissions. However, low-carbon retrofitting of existing public buildings is not sufficient and systematic, and there is a lack of research on low-carbon retrofitting from the perspective of GBRS. The purpose of this study is to propose a carbon emission control framework for existing public buildings based on GBRS analysis and guide the low-carbon retrofitting. This study makes comparisons among the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), Green Mark (GM), and Assessment Standard for Green Retrofitting of Existing Buildings (ASGREB). A low-carbon retrofit pathway for existing public buildings is proposed from the GBRS research for the first time, encompassing six aspects: materials, energy, management, innovation, site, and water, involving 15 measures. Among them, measures on energy and materials are the main considerations, with weights of 18.3% and 17.7%, respectively. Six recommendations for implementation pathways are also given. Furthermore, the necessary measures, the importance of local context and quantification, priorities of materials, and energy scopes are defined.
Record ID
Keywords
carbon emissions, comparative study, existing public buildings, green building rating systems (GBRS), low-carbon retrofitting
Subject
Suggested Citation
Liu K, Tian J, Chen J, Wen Y. Low-Carbon Retrofitting Path of Existing Public Buildings: A Comparative Study Based on Green Building Rating Systems. (2023). LAPSE:2023.8087
Author Affiliations
Liu K: School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Construction Carbon Neutral Technology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 21501 [ORCID]
Tian J: School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China; Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Building Energy Efficiency, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China [ORCID]
Chen J: School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Construction Carbon Neutral Technology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 21501
Wen Y: School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Tian J: School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China; Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Building Energy Efficiency, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China [ORCID]
Chen J: School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China; Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Construction Carbon Neutral Technology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 21501
Wen Y: School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
22
First Page
8724
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-11-20
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15228724, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.8087
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228724
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
179
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 24, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 24, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.8087
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
