LAPSE:2023.5318
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.5318
Optimization of Hydrolysis-Acidogenesis Phase of Swine Manure for Biogas Production Using Two-Stage Anaerobic Fermentation
February 23, 2023
Abstract
The traditional pig manure wastewater treatment in Taiwan has been low in methane production efficiency due to unstable influent concentration, wastewater volume, and quality. Two-stage anaerobic systems, in contrast, have the advantage of buffering the organic loading rate in the first stage (hydrolysis-acidogenesis phase), allowing a more constant feeding rate to the second stage (methanogenesis phase). Response surface methodology was applied to optimize the operational period (0.5−2.0 d) and initial operational pH (4−10) for hydrolysis and acidogenesis of the swine manure (total solid 5.3%) at 35 °C in batch operation mode. A methanogenesis verification experiment with the optimal condition of operational period 1.5 d and pH 6.5 using batch operation resulted in peak volatile acid production 7 g COD/L, methane production rate (MPR) 0.3 L-CH4/L-d, and methane yield (MY) 92 mL-CH4/g-CODre (chemical oxygen demand removed). Moreover, a two-stage system including a hydrolysis-acidogenesis reactor with the optimal operating condition and a methanogenesis reactor provided an average MPR 163 mL/L-d and MY 38 mL/g volatile solids, which values are 60% higher than those of a single-stage system; both systems have similar dominant methane-producing species of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes with each having around 30%−40%. The advantages of a two-stage anaerobic fermentation system in treating swine manure for biogas production are obvious.
The traditional pig manure wastewater treatment in Taiwan has been low in methane production efficiency due to unstable influent concentration, wastewater volume, and quality. Two-stage anaerobic systems, in contrast, have the advantage of buffering the organic loading rate in the first stage (hydrolysis-acidogenesis phase), allowing a more constant feeding rate to the second stage (methanogenesis phase). Response surface methodology was applied to optimize the operational period (0.5−2.0 d) and initial operational pH (4−10) for hydrolysis and acidogenesis of the swine manure (total solid 5.3%) at 35 °C in batch operation mode. A methanogenesis verification experiment with the optimal condition of operational period 1.5 d and pH 6.5 using batch operation resulted in peak volatile acid production 7 g COD/L, methane production rate (MPR) 0.3 L-CH4/L-d, and methane yield (MY) 92 mL-CH4/g-CODre (chemical oxygen demand removed). Moreover, a two-stage system including a hydrolysis-acidogenesis reactor with the optimal operating condition and a methanogenesis reactor provided an average MPR 163 mL/L-d and MY 38 mL/g volatile solids, which values are 60% higher than those of a single-stage system; both systems have similar dominant methane-producing species of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes with each having around 30%−40%. The advantages of a two-stage anaerobic fermentation system in treating swine manure for biogas production are obvious.
Record ID
Keywords
biomethane, operational time, response surface methodology (RSM), swine manure, two-stage anaerobic digestion
Subject
Suggested Citation
Lin CY, Chai WS, Lay CH, Chen CC, Lee CY, Show PL. Optimization of Hydrolysis-Acidogenesis Phase of Swine Manure for Biogas Production Using Two-Stage Anaerobic Fermentation. (2023). LAPSE:2023.5318
Author Affiliations
Lin CY: Green Energy and Biotechnology Industry Research Center, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan; Master’s Program of Green Energy Science and Technology, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan; Department of Environmental Engineeri
Chai WS: Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia
Lay CH: Green Energy and Biotechnology Industry Research Center, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan; Master’s Program of Green Energy Science and Technology, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan; Professional Master’s Program for I [ORCID]
Chen CC: Department of Landscape Architecture, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Changhwa 51000, Taiwan
Lee CY: Master’s Program of Green Energy Science and Technology, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan
Show PL: Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia [ORCID]
Chai WS: Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia
Lay CH: Green Energy and Biotechnology Industry Research Center, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan; Master’s Program of Green Energy Science and Technology, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan; Professional Master’s Program for I [ORCID]
Chen CC: Department of Landscape Architecture, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Changhwa 51000, Taiwan
Lee CY: Master’s Program of Green Energy Science and Technology, Feng Chia University, Taichung City 40724, Taiwan
Show PL: Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
9
Issue
8
First Page
1324
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-07-29
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr9081324, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.5318
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081324
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
235
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 23, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 23, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.5318
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
