LAPSE:2023.36177v1
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.36177v1
A Multi-Stage Decision Framework for Optimal Energy Efficiency Measures of Educational Buildings: A Case Study of Chongqing
July 4, 2023
Abstract
Buildings consume large amounts of energy resources and emit considerable amounts of greenhouse gases, especially existing buildings that do not meet energy standards. Building retrofitting is considered one of the most promising and significant solutions to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. However, finding suitable energy efficiency measures for existing buildings is extremely difficult due to the existence of thousands of retrofit measures and the need to meet various objectives. In this paper, a multi-stage decision framework, including a multi-objective optimization model, and a ranking method are proposed to help decision-makers select the optimal energy efficiency measures. The multi-objective optimization model considers the economic and environmental objectives, expressed as the retrofit cost and energy consumption, respectively. The entropy weight ideal point ranking method, an evaluation and ranking method that combines the entropy weight method and ideal point method, is adopted to sort the Pareto front and make a final decision. Then, the proposed decision framework was implemented for the retrofit planning of an educational building in Chongqing, China. The results show that decision-makers can quickly identify near-optimal energy efficiency measures through multi-objective optimization and can select suitable energy efficiency measures using the ranking method. Moreover, energy consumption can be reduced by building retrofitting. The energy consumption of the case building was 64.20 kWh/m2 before retrofitting, and the value can be reduced by 6.79% through retrofitting. Furthermore, the reduction in building energy consumption was significantly improved by applying the decision framework. The highest value of energy consumption was 59.84 kWh/m2, while the lowest value was 27.11 kWh/m2 when implementing the multi-stage decision framework. Thus, this paper provides a useful decision framework for decision-makers to formulate suitable energy efficiency measures.
Buildings consume large amounts of energy resources and emit considerable amounts of greenhouse gases, especially existing buildings that do not meet energy standards. Building retrofitting is considered one of the most promising and significant solutions to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. However, finding suitable energy efficiency measures for existing buildings is extremely difficult due to the existence of thousands of retrofit measures and the need to meet various objectives. In this paper, a multi-stage decision framework, including a multi-objective optimization model, and a ranking method are proposed to help decision-makers select the optimal energy efficiency measures. The multi-objective optimization model considers the economic and environmental objectives, expressed as the retrofit cost and energy consumption, respectively. The entropy weight ideal point ranking method, an evaluation and ranking method that combines the entropy weight method and ideal point method, is adopted to sort the Pareto front and make a final decision. Then, the proposed decision framework was implemented for the retrofit planning of an educational building in Chongqing, China. The results show that decision-makers can quickly identify near-optimal energy efficiency measures through multi-objective optimization and can select suitable energy efficiency measures using the ranking method. Moreover, energy consumption can be reduced by building retrofitting. The energy consumption of the case building was 64.20 kWh/m2 before retrofitting, and the value can be reduced by 6.79% through retrofitting. Furthermore, the reduction in building energy consumption was significantly improved by applying the decision framework. The highest value of energy consumption was 59.84 kWh/m2, while the lowest value was 27.11 kWh/m2 when implementing the multi-stage decision framework. Thus, this paper provides a useful decision framework for decision-makers to formulate suitable energy efficiency measures.
Record ID
Keywords
building retrofitting, educational buildings, energy consumption, multi-stage decision framework, optimal energy efficiency measures, retrofit cost
Subject
Suggested Citation
Cui W, Hong J, Liu G, Zhang L, Wei L. A Multi-Stage Decision Framework for Optimal Energy Efficiency Measures of Educational Buildings: A Case Study of Chongqing. (2023). LAPSE:2023.36177v1
Author Affiliations
Cui W: School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
Hong J: School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Liu G: School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Zhang L: School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China [ORCID]
Wei L: College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
Hong J: School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Liu G: School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Zhang L: School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China [ORCID]
Wei L: College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
11
Issue
6
First Page
1633
Year
2023
Publication Date
2023-05-26
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr11061633, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.36177v1
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061633
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
378
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jul 4, 2023
Verified by curator on
Jul 4, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.36177v1
Record Owner
Calvin Tsay
Links to Related Works
(0.11 seconds)
[0.11 s]
