LAPSE:2023.32364
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.32364
Performance Analysis and Comparison of a Concentrated Photovoltaic System with Different Phase Change Materials
April 20, 2023
Abstract
In this work, temperature regulation and electrical output of a concentrated photovoltaic system coupled with a phase change material (CPVPCM) system is investigated and compared with a single sun crystalline photovoltaic (PV) system. A fully coupled thermal-optical-electrical model has been developed in-house to conduct the simulation studies for actual weather conditions of Doha (Qatar) and selected phase change materials (PCMs). The selected PCMs are lauric acid, RT47, S-series salt, STL47, ClimSelTM C48, RT54, RT60, RT62, and RT64. An optical concentration ratio of 20× is considered on a 15 mm wide crystalline silicon cell. The temperature evolution, thermal energy storage and electrical output of the CPVPCM system are obtained for 48-hour simulations with representative weather conditions for each month of a typical meteorological year (TMY). Results and overall thermal and electrical efficiency are compared for each PCM. In brief, the CPVPCM system with S-series salt performs better than all other PCM with an overall efficiency of 54.4%. Furthermore, this system consistently produces more power than a PV system with an equal footprint (1 m2) for each month of the TMY.
In this work, temperature regulation and electrical output of a concentrated photovoltaic system coupled with a phase change material (CPVPCM) system is investigated and compared with a single sun crystalline photovoltaic (PV) system. A fully coupled thermal-optical-electrical model has been developed in-house to conduct the simulation studies for actual weather conditions of Doha (Qatar) and selected phase change materials (PCMs). The selected PCMs are lauric acid, RT47, S-series salt, STL47, ClimSelTM C48, RT54, RT60, RT62, and RT64. An optical concentration ratio of 20× is considered on a 15 mm wide crystalline silicon cell. The temperature evolution, thermal energy storage and electrical output of the CPVPCM system are obtained for 48-hour simulations with representative weather conditions for each month of a typical meteorological year (TMY). Results and overall thermal and electrical efficiency are compared for each PCM. In brief, the CPVPCM system with S-series salt performs better than all other PCM with an overall efficiency of 54.4%. Furthermore, this system consistently produces more power than a PV system with an equal footprint (1 m2) for each month of the TMY.
Record ID
Keywords
concentrated photovoltaic, finite element method, overall efficiency, phase change material, thermal efficiency
Subject
Suggested Citation
Sarwar J, Shad MR, Hasnain A, Ali F, Kakosimos KE, Ghosh A. Performance Analysis and Comparison of a Concentrated Photovoltaic System with Different Phase Change Materials. (2023). LAPSE:2023.32364
Author Affiliations
Sarwar J: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Shad MR: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54782, Pakistan
Hasnain A: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Ali F: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Kakosimos KE: Chemical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University at Qatar, P.O. Box 23874, Doha, Qatar; Aerosol & Particle Technology Laboratory, Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (APTL/CPERI/CERTH), P.O. Box 6036 [ORCID]
Ghosh A: College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Renewable Energy, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK [ORCID]
Shad MR: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54782, Pakistan
Hasnain A: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Ali F: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Kakosimos KE: Chemical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University at Qatar, P.O. Box 23874, Doha, Qatar; Aerosol & Particle Technology Laboratory, Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (APTL/CPERI/CERTH), P.O. Box 6036 [ORCID]
Ghosh A: College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Renewable Energy, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
10
First Page
2911
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-05-18
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14102911, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.32364
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102911
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
223
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 20, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 20, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.32364
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
[0.29 s]
