LAPSE:2023.3207
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.3207
Simulations of Heat Supply Performance of a Deep Borehole Heat Exchanger under Different Scheduled Operation Conditions
February 22, 2023
Abstract
With the changing world energy structure, the development of renewable energy sources is gradually accelerating. Among them, close attention has been given to geothermal energy because of its abundant resources and supply stability. In this article, a deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE) is coupled with a heat pump system to calculate the heat supply and daily electricity consumption of the system. To make better use of the peaks and valleys in electricity prices, the following three daily operating modes were studied: 24-h operation (Mode 1), 8-h operation plus 16-h non-operation (Mode 2), and two cycles of 4-h operation and 8-h non-operation (Mode 3). Simulation results show that scheduled non-continuous operation can effectively improve the outlet temperature of the heat extraction fluid circulating in the DBHE. The heat extraction rates of Mode 1 is 190.9 kW for mass flowrate of 9 kg/s; in Mode 2 and Mode 3 cases, the rates change to 304.7 kW and 293.0 kW, respectively. The daily operational electricity cost of Mode 1 is the greatest because of 24-h operation; due to scheduled non-continuous operation, the daily operational electricity cost of Mode 3 is only about 66% of that of Mode 2. After an 8-month period without heating, the formation-temperature can be restored within 4 °C of its original state; 90% recovery of the formation-temperature can be achieved by the end of the second month of the non-operation season.
With the changing world energy structure, the development of renewable energy sources is gradually accelerating. Among them, close attention has been given to geothermal energy because of its abundant resources and supply stability. In this article, a deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE) is coupled with a heat pump system to calculate the heat supply and daily electricity consumption of the system. To make better use of the peaks and valleys in electricity prices, the following three daily operating modes were studied: 24-h operation (Mode 1), 8-h operation plus 16-h non-operation (Mode 2), and two cycles of 4-h operation and 8-h non-operation (Mode 3). Simulation results show that scheduled non-continuous operation can effectively improve the outlet temperature of the heat extraction fluid circulating in the DBHE. The heat extraction rates of Mode 1 is 190.9 kW for mass flowrate of 9 kg/s; in Mode 2 and Mode 3 cases, the rates change to 304.7 kW and 293.0 kW, respectively. The daily operational electricity cost of Mode 1 is the greatest because of 24-h operation; due to scheduled non-continuous operation, the daily operational electricity cost of Mode 3 is only about 66% of that of Mode 2. After an 8-month period without heating, the formation-temperature can be restored within 4 °C of its original state; 90% recovery of the formation-temperature can be achieved by the end of the second month of the non-operation season.
Record ID
Keywords
deep borehole heat exchanger, geothermal energy, heating, scheduled non-continuous operation
Subject
Suggested Citation
Zhang J, Lu X, Zhang W, Liu J, Yue W, Liu D, Meng Q, Ma F. Simulations of Heat Supply Performance of a Deep Borehole Heat Exchanger under Different Scheduled Operation Conditions. (2023). LAPSE:2023.3207
Author Affiliations
Zhang J: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Lu X: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Zhang W: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Liu J: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Yue W: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Liu D: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Meng Q: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Ma F: Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
Lu X: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Zhang W: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Liu J: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Yue W: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Liu D: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Meng Q: Tianjin Geothermal Research and Training Center, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, MOE, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Universi
Ma F: Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
1
First Page
121
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-01-07
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10010121, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.3207
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010121
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
301
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 22, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 22, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.3207
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
