LAPSE:2023.31688
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.31688
Research on the Influence of Axisymmetric Endwall on EAT Performance
April 19, 2023
Abstract
To improve the performance of electrically assisted turbochargers (EATs), the influences of the hub profile and the casing profile on EAT performance were numerically studied by controlling the upper and lower endwall profiles. An artificial neural network and a genetic algorithm were used to optimize the endwall profile, considering the total pressure ratio and the isentropic efficiency at the peak efficiency point. Different performances of the prototype EAT and the optimized EAT under variable clearance sizes were discussed. The endwall profile affects an EAT by making the main flow structure in the endwall area decelerate and then accelerate due to the expansion and contraction of the meridional surface, which weakens the secondary leakage flow of the prototype EAT and changes the momentum ratio of the clearance leakage flow and the separation flow in the suction surface corner area. Because the tip region flow has a more significant influence on EAT performance, the optimal casing scheme has a better effect than the hub scheme. The optimization design can increase the isentropic efficiency of the maximum efficiency point by 1.5%, the total pressure ratio by 0.67%, the mass flow rate by 1.2%, and the general margin by 6.4%.
To improve the performance of electrically assisted turbochargers (EATs), the influences of the hub profile and the casing profile on EAT performance were numerically studied by controlling the upper and lower endwall profiles. An artificial neural network and a genetic algorithm were used to optimize the endwall profile, considering the total pressure ratio and the isentropic efficiency at the peak efficiency point. Different performances of the prototype EAT and the optimized EAT under variable clearance sizes were discussed. The endwall profile affects an EAT by making the main flow structure in the endwall area decelerate and then accelerate due to the expansion and contraction of the meridional surface, which weakens the secondary leakage flow of the prototype EAT and changes the momentum ratio of the clearance leakage flow and the separation flow in the suction surface corner area. Because the tip region flow has a more significant influence on EAT performance, the optimal casing scheme has a better effect than the hub scheme. The optimization design can increase the isentropic efficiency of the maximum efficiency point by 1.5%, the total pressure ratio by 0.67%, the mass flow rate by 1.2%, and the general margin by 6.4%.
Record ID
Keywords
axial compressor, axisymmetric endwall, electrically assisted turbocharger, optimization design
Subject
Suggested Citation
Teng H, Wu W, Zhong J. Research on the Influence of Axisymmetric Endwall on EAT Performance. (2023). LAPSE:2023.31688
Author Affiliations
Teng H: Liaoning Province Key Laboratory of Marine Small Gas Turbine Technology, Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China [ORCID]
Wu W: Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 200120, China
Zhong J: Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 200120, China [ORCID]
Wu W: Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 200120, China
Zhong J: Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 200120, China [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
8
First Page
2215
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-04-15
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14082215, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.31688
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082215
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
231
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 19, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 19, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.31688
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.61 seconds) 0.1 + 0.05 + 0.2 + 0.1 + 0 + 0.04 + 0.03 + 0 + 0.03 + 0.05 + 0 + 0.01
