LAPSE:2023.28168
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.28168
Study on Relationships between Coal Microstructure and Coke Quality during Coking Process
April 11, 2023
Abstract
Optimizing coal blending is important for high-quality development of coking industries, among which deep understanding of relationships between coal characteristics and coke quality is critical. This work selected four typical coals from Shanxi Province in China to investigate influences of their structures and properties on coke quality. Although these samples belong to coking coals, the mechanical strength and thermal strength of the corresponding cokes are quite different. Macerals in coals, especially vitrinite, have significant effect on thermal strength of cokes. The thermal strength of coke B is better than coke A, because coal A mainly contains desmocollinite and coal B has more telocollinite. The CSR of coke B, C and D is higher than 60%, indicating they possess good thermal property. In the coking process, relatively low initial softening temperature (100 °C), smooth fluidity region and appropriate maximum fluidity is helpful to improve coke quality based on Gieseler fluidity analysis. Coal C and Coal D have lower condensation degree, shorter aliphatic chain, and more hydrogen bond, which reveals that the condensation degree and hydrogen bond play important roles on the formation of plastic mass and coke thermal strength. Coke A shows unsatisfied properties because coal A has higher condensation degree and less hydrogen bond. In addition, TG-MS and CH4 evolution characteristics also imply the volatile matter released from coal A during pyrolysis mainly comes from the covalent bond with higher bond energy, which indicates that the chemical bond of coal A is more stable than other coals.
Optimizing coal blending is important for high-quality development of coking industries, among which deep understanding of relationships between coal characteristics and coke quality is critical. This work selected four typical coals from Shanxi Province in China to investigate influences of their structures and properties on coke quality. Although these samples belong to coking coals, the mechanical strength and thermal strength of the corresponding cokes are quite different. Macerals in coals, especially vitrinite, have significant effect on thermal strength of cokes. The thermal strength of coke B is better than coke A, because coal A mainly contains desmocollinite and coal B has more telocollinite. The CSR of coke B, C and D is higher than 60%, indicating they possess good thermal property. In the coking process, relatively low initial softening temperature (100 °C), smooth fluidity region and appropriate maximum fluidity is helpful to improve coke quality based on Gieseler fluidity analysis. Coal C and Coal D have lower condensation degree, shorter aliphatic chain, and more hydrogen bond, which reveals that the condensation degree and hydrogen bond play important roles on the formation of plastic mass and coke thermal strength. Coke A shows unsatisfied properties because coal A has higher condensation degree and less hydrogen bond. In addition, TG-MS and CH4 evolution characteristics also imply the volatile matter released from coal A during pyrolysis mainly comes from the covalent bond with higher bond energy, which indicates that the chemical bond of coal A is more stable than other coals.
Record ID
Keywords
chemical structure, coke property, coking coal, coking process, microstructure
Subject
Suggested Citation
Wang Y, Zhou Q, Zhao Q, Qu S, Zhang Y. Study on Relationships between Coal Microstructure and Coke Quality during Coking Process. (2023). LAPSE:2023.28168
Author Affiliations
Wang Y: China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China
Zhou Q: CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China
Zhao Q: CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China
Qu S: CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China
Zhang Y: State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
Zhou Q: CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China
Zhao Q: CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China
Qu S: CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China
Zhang Y: State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
11
Issue
3
First Page
724
Year
2023
Publication Date
2023-02-28
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr11030724, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.28168
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030724
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
198
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 11, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 11, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.28168
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.08 seconds)
[0.09 s]
