LAPSE:2023.27364
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.27364
CO2 Foam and CO2 Polymer Enhanced Foam for Heavy Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage
April 4, 2023
Abstract
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) from heavy oil reservoirs is challenging. High oil viscosity, high mobility ratio, inadequate sweep, and reservoir heterogeneity adds more challenges and severe difficulties during any EOR method. Foam injection showed potential as an EOR method for challenging and heterogeneous reservoirs containing light oil. However, the foams and especially polymer enhanced foams (PEF) for heavy oil recovery have been less studied. This study aims to evaluate the performance of CO2 foam and CO2 PEF for heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage by analyzing flow through porous media pressure profile, oil recovery, and CO2 gas production. Foam bulk stability tests showed higher stability of PEF compared to that of surfactant-based foam both in the absence and presence of heavy crude oil. The addition of polymer to surfactant-based foam significantly improved its dynamic stability during foam flow experiments. CO2 PEF propagated faster with higher apparent viscosity and resulted in more oil recovery compared to that of CO2 foam injection. The visual observation of glass column demonstrated stable frontal displacement and higher sweep efficiency of PEF compared to that of conventional foam. In the fractured rock sample, additional heavy oil recovery was obtained by liquid diversion into the matrix area rather than gas diversion. Aside from oil production, the higher stability of PEF resulted in more gas storage compared to conventional foam. This study shows that CO2 PEF could significantly improve heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage.
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) from heavy oil reservoirs is challenging. High oil viscosity, high mobility ratio, inadequate sweep, and reservoir heterogeneity adds more challenges and severe difficulties during any EOR method. Foam injection showed potential as an EOR method for challenging and heterogeneous reservoirs containing light oil. However, the foams and especially polymer enhanced foams (PEF) for heavy oil recovery have been less studied. This study aims to evaluate the performance of CO2 foam and CO2 PEF for heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage by analyzing flow through porous media pressure profile, oil recovery, and CO2 gas production. Foam bulk stability tests showed higher stability of PEF compared to that of surfactant-based foam both in the absence and presence of heavy crude oil. The addition of polymer to surfactant-based foam significantly improved its dynamic stability during foam flow experiments. CO2 PEF propagated faster with higher apparent viscosity and resulted in more oil recovery compared to that of CO2 foam injection. The visual observation of glass column demonstrated stable frontal displacement and higher sweep efficiency of PEF compared to that of conventional foam. In the fractured rock sample, additional heavy oil recovery was obtained by liquid diversion into the matrix area rather than gas diversion. Aside from oil production, the higher stability of PEF resulted in more gas storage compared to conventional foam. This study shows that CO2 PEF could significantly improve heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage.
Record ID
Keywords
CO2 foam, CO2 storage, fractured reservoir, heavy oil recovery, polymer enhanced foam
Subject
Suggested Citation
Telmadarreie A, Trivedi JJ. CO2 Foam and CO2 Polymer Enhanced Foam for Heavy Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage. (2023). LAPSE:2023.27364
Author Affiliations
Telmadarreie A: Office of the Vice-President (Research), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; Cnergreen Corporation, Life Sciences Innovation Hub (LSIH) 3655 36 St NW, Calgary, AB T2L 1Y8, Canada
Trivedi JJ: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Mining and Petroleum, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Trivedi JJ: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Mining and Petroleum, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
13
Issue
21
Article Number
E5735
Year
2020
Publication Date
2020-11-02
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en13215735, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.27364
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215735
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
181
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 4, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 4, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.27364
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
[0.4 s]
