LAPSE:2023.26710
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.26710
Evolution of Production and Transport Characteristics of Steeply-Dipping Ultra-Thick Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
April 3, 2023
Abstract
The large spatial variability of in-situ stress and initial reservoir pressure in steeply-dipping ultra-thick coalbed methane (UTCBM) reservoirs exert strong control on the initial distribution of stress-sensitive permeability. This results in significant differences in the propagation of reservoir depressurization, gas production characteristics, distribution of fluid saturation, and evolution of permeability relative to flat-lying and thin counterpart coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. We contrast these responses using the Fukang mining area of the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China, as a type-example using coupled hydro-mechanical modeling. Production response indicates: (1) Dual peaks in CBM production rate, due to the asynchronous changes in the gas production rate in each the upper and lower sections of the reservoir; (2) higher depressurization and water saturation levels in the lower section of the reservoir relative to the upper at any given distance from the production well that ameliorate with time to be similar to those of standard horizontal reservoirs; (3) the heterogeneity in effective stress is further amplified by the asymmetry of the initial pressure drawdown distribution of the reservoir to exert extreme control on the down-dip evolution of absolute permeability—with implications for production. Field drainage data and simulation results obtained in this study more accurately reflect the drainage characteristics of the steeply-dipping UTCBM reservoirs. For ultra-thick low-rank coal seams, permeability anisotropy plays an important role in determining the utility of horizontal wells and hydraulic fracturing to maximize rates and yields CBM production, and requiring further study.
The large spatial variability of in-situ stress and initial reservoir pressure in steeply-dipping ultra-thick coalbed methane (UTCBM) reservoirs exert strong control on the initial distribution of stress-sensitive permeability. This results in significant differences in the propagation of reservoir depressurization, gas production characteristics, distribution of fluid saturation, and evolution of permeability relative to flat-lying and thin counterpart coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. We contrast these responses using the Fukang mining area of the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China, as a type-example using coupled hydro-mechanical modeling. Production response indicates: (1) Dual peaks in CBM production rate, due to the asynchronous changes in the gas production rate in each the upper and lower sections of the reservoir; (2) higher depressurization and water saturation levels in the lower section of the reservoir relative to the upper at any given distance from the production well that ameliorate with time to be similar to those of standard horizontal reservoirs; (3) the heterogeneity in effective stress is further amplified by the asymmetry of the initial pressure drawdown distribution of the reservoir to exert extreme control on the down-dip evolution of absolute permeability—with implications for production. Field drainage data and simulation results obtained in this study more accurately reflect the drainage characteristics of the steeply-dipping UTCBM reservoirs. For ultra-thick low-rank coal seams, permeability anisotropy plays an important role in determining the utility of horizontal wells and hydraulic fracturing to maximize rates and yields CBM production, and requiring further study.
Record ID
Keywords
anisotropic permeability, coalbed methane, dual peak production, large dip angle, stress heterogeneity, ultra-thick
Subject
Suggested Citation
Liang S, Han H, Elsworth D, Fu X, Yao Q, Kang J, Li X, Li X. Evolution of Production and Transport Characteristics of Steeply-Dipping Ultra-Thick Coalbed Methane Reservoirs. (2023). LAPSE:2023.26710
Author Affiliations
Liang S: State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Mine Safety, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China; EMS Energy Institute, G3 Center and Energy and Mineral Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Han H: State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Mine Safety, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China [ORCID]
Elsworth D: EMS Energy Institute, G3 Center and Energy and Mineral Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Fu X: Key Laboratory of CBM Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
Yao Q: State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Mine Safety, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China [ORCID]
Kang J: EMS Energy Institute, G3 Center and Energy and Mineral Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; Key Laboratory of CBM Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Techn
Li X: School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumchi 830047, China
Li X: State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Mine Safety, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
Han H: State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Mine Safety, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China [ORCID]
Elsworth D: EMS Energy Institute, G3 Center and Energy and Mineral Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Fu X: Key Laboratory of CBM Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
Yao Q: State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Mine Safety, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China [ORCID]
Kang J: EMS Energy Institute, G3 Center and Energy and Mineral Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; Key Laboratory of CBM Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Techn
Li X: School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumchi 830047, China
Li X: State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Mine Safety, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
13
Issue
19
Article Number
E5081
Year
2020
Publication Date
2020-09-29
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en13195081, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.26710
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195081
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
175
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 3, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 3, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.26710
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
