LAPSE:2023.2238
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2238
Study on Combined Vacuum−Mechanical Defoaming Technology for Flotation Froth and Its Mechanism
February 21, 2023
Abstract
Foam is essential in the flotation process. However, the gas−liquid−solid three-phase froth produced in the flotation process has very strong stability and is difficult to burst spontaneously. The existence of these froths will reduce the transport capacity of the pulp and affect the working efficiency of subsequent processes, such as filtration of the flotation concentrate. In this study, a new defoaming device is designed by combining mechanical impact with depressurized defoaming and its defoaming mechanism is analyzed theoretically. In addition, the liquid level height and pulp overflow method are applied to characterize the defoaming efficiency of the new defoaming device. The effects of impeller structure, pressure drop, impeller rotation frequency, and aeration rate on defoaming efficiency were studied. The results show that when increasing the pressure drop, the defoaming increases, but it will also enhance the generation of bubbles. The efficiency of combined mechanical−vacuum defoaming technology is superior under low-pressure drop using an SC impeller. Under −1 kpa vacuum condition, it only takes 168 s to eliminate 20 cm flotation froth height with combined mechanical impact, while it takes 453 s under ambient pressure, indicating that under vacuum conditions, the mechanical-defoaming method can significantly improve the defoaming efficiency, and the two have a certain synergistic effect.
Foam is essential in the flotation process. However, the gas−liquid−solid three-phase froth produced in the flotation process has very strong stability and is difficult to burst spontaneously. The existence of these froths will reduce the transport capacity of the pulp and affect the working efficiency of subsequent processes, such as filtration of the flotation concentrate. In this study, a new defoaming device is designed by combining mechanical impact with depressurized defoaming and its defoaming mechanism is analyzed theoretically. In addition, the liquid level height and pulp overflow method are applied to characterize the defoaming efficiency of the new defoaming device. The effects of impeller structure, pressure drop, impeller rotation frequency, and aeration rate on defoaming efficiency were studied. The results show that when increasing the pressure drop, the defoaming increases, but it will also enhance the generation of bubbles. The efficiency of combined mechanical−vacuum defoaming technology is superior under low-pressure drop using an SC impeller. Under −1 kpa vacuum condition, it only takes 168 s to eliminate 20 cm flotation froth height with combined mechanical impact, while it takes 453 s under ambient pressure, indicating that under vacuum conditions, the mechanical-defoaming method can significantly improve the defoaming efficiency, and the two have a certain synergistic effect.
Record ID
Keywords
Coal, defoaming, flotation froth, vacuum
Subject
Suggested Citation
Jiang H, Liu J, Wang H, Yang R, Zhao W, Yang D, Yin S, Shen L. Study on Combined Vacuum−Mechanical Defoaming Technology for Flotation Froth and Its Mechanism. (2023). LAPSE:2023.2238
Author Affiliations
Jiang H: Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
Liu J: Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Command Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100055, China
Wang H: School of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Yang R: School of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Zhao W: Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Harbin 150039, China
Yang D: Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
Yin S: Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
Shen L: College of Material Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China [ORCID]
Liu J: Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Command Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100055, China
Wang H: School of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Yang R: School of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Zhao W: Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Harbin 150039, China
Yang D: Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
Yin S: Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
Shen L: College of Material Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
6
First Page
1183
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-06-14
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10061183, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2238
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061183
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
451
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.2238
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
[0.2 s]
