LAPSE:2023.2210
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2210
Spray Cooling Schemes and Temperature Field Analysis of Ultra-High-Temperature Production Wells in Underground Coal Gasification
February 21, 2023
Abstract
In underground coal gasification (UCG), it is essential for UCG production to accurately control the temperature of the gas produced at the wellhead of the production well and correctly calculate the variation law of the temperature field in the whole wellbore. UCG wellbore structures use three wellbore sprayed water cooling schemes. These schemes consider the heat exchange mechanism between the wellbore and the formation, the division of the production wellbore into the spray chamber section and the non-spray section, and the established temperature field model of the whole wellbore. The research shows that, due to the large temperature gradient formed in the wellbore heat transfer route under the spray tubing water injection cooling scheme, the temperature of the produced gas drops the most. The annular water injection cooling scheme can protect the cement sheath to a certain extent and is easier to implement; therefore, it is more suitable to use this scheme to cool the production well. It is feasible to control the temperature of the production wellhead by controlling the temperature of the spray chamber. The greater the daily output of produced gas or the thermal conductivity of the tubing, the smaller the temperature change between the bottom hole and the wellhead, and the more the spray water temperature rises.
In underground coal gasification (UCG), it is essential for UCG production to accurately control the temperature of the gas produced at the wellhead of the production well and correctly calculate the variation law of the temperature field in the whole wellbore. UCG wellbore structures use three wellbore sprayed water cooling schemes. These schemes consider the heat exchange mechanism between the wellbore and the formation, the division of the production wellbore into the spray chamber section and the non-spray section, and the established temperature field model of the whole wellbore. The research shows that, due to the large temperature gradient formed in the wellbore heat transfer route under the spray tubing water injection cooling scheme, the temperature of the produced gas drops the most. The annular water injection cooling scheme can protect the cement sheath to a certain extent and is easier to implement; therefore, it is more suitable to use this scheme to cool the production well. It is feasible to control the temperature of the production wellhead by controlling the temperature of the spray chamber. The greater the daily output of produced gas or the thermal conductivity of the tubing, the smaller the temperature change between the bottom hole and the wellhead, and the more the spray water temperature rises.
Record ID
Keywords
gasifier, spray cooling, temperature field, underground coal gasification, wellbore heat transfer
Subject
Suggested Citation
Tang Y, Xiong H, He Y, Huang S, Wang Y. Spray Cooling Schemes and Temperature Field Analysis of Ultra-High-Temperature Production Wells in Underground Coal Gasification. (2023). LAPSE:2023.2210
Author Affiliations
Tang Y: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Xiong H: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
He Y: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Huang S: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Wang Y: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Xiong H: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
He Y: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Huang S: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Wang Y: School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Energy Equipment Institute, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
6
First Page
1149
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-06-08
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10061149, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.2210
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061149
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
364
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.2210
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
[0.46 s]
