LAPSE:2023.20592
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.20592
What Is the Optimal Method for Cleaning Screen-Printed Electrodes?
March 20, 2023
Abstract
Screen-printed electrodes-based sensors can be successfully used to determine all kinds of analytes with great precision and specificity. However, obtaining a high-quality sensor can be difficult due to factors such as lack of reproducibility, surface contamination or other manufacturing challenges. An important step in ensuring reproducible results is the cleaning step. The aim of the current work is to help researchers around the world who struggle with finding the most suitable method for cleaning screen-printed electrodes. We evaluated the cleaning efficiency of different chemical compounds and cleaning methods using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The percentage differences in polarization resistance (Rp) before and after cleaning were as follows: acetone—35.33% for gold and 49.94 for platinum; ethanol—44.50% for gold and 81.68% for platinum; H2O2—47.34% for gold and 92.78% for platinum; electrochemical method—3.70% for gold and 67.96% for platinum. Thus, we concluded that all the evaluated cleaning methods seem to improve the surface of both gold and platinum electrodes; however, the most important reduction in the polarization resistance (Rp) was obtained after treating them with a solution of H2O2 and multiple CV cycles with a low scanning speed (10 mV/s).
Screen-printed electrodes-based sensors can be successfully used to determine all kinds of analytes with great precision and specificity. However, obtaining a high-quality sensor can be difficult due to factors such as lack of reproducibility, surface contamination or other manufacturing challenges. An important step in ensuring reproducible results is the cleaning step. The aim of the current work is to help researchers around the world who struggle with finding the most suitable method for cleaning screen-printed electrodes. We evaluated the cleaning efficiency of different chemical compounds and cleaning methods using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The percentage differences in polarization resistance (Rp) before and after cleaning were as follows: acetone—35.33% for gold and 49.94 for platinum; ethanol—44.50% for gold and 81.68% for platinum; H2O2—47.34% for gold and 92.78% for platinum; electrochemical method—3.70% for gold and 67.96% for platinum. Thus, we concluded that all the evaluated cleaning methods seem to improve the surface of both gold and platinum electrodes; however, the most important reduction in the polarization resistance (Rp) was obtained after treating them with a solution of H2O2 and multiple CV cycles with a low scanning speed (10 mV/s).
Record ID
Keywords
biosensors, cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, electrochemistry, screen-printed electrodes
Subject
Suggested Citation
Stan D, Mirica AC, Iosub R, Stan D, Mincu NB, Gheorghe M, Avram M, Adiaconita B, Craciun G, Bocancia Mateescu AL. What Is the Optimal Method for Cleaning Screen-Printed Electrodes?. (2023). LAPSE:2023.20592
Author Affiliations
Stan D: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania
Mirica AC: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania; Advanced Polymer Materials Group, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1−7 Gh. Polizu Street, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
Iosub R: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania
Stan D: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania; Doctoral Medical School, Titu Maiorescu University, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
Mincu NB: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania; Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 060101 Bucharest, Romania
Gheorghe M: NANOM MEMS SRL, 505400 Rasnov, Romania [ORCID]
Avram M: National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies—IMT Bucharest, 126A Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, 077190 Bucharest, Romania [ORCID]
Adiaconita B: National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies—IMT Bucharest, 126A Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, 077190 Bucharest, Romania
Craciun G: National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies—IMT Bucharest, 126A Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, 077190 Bucharest, Romania
Bocancia Mateescu AL: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania
Mirica AC: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania; Advanced Polymer Materials Group, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1−7 Gh. Polizu Street, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
Iosub R: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania
Stan D: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania; Doctoral Medical School, Titu Maiorescu University, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
Mincu NB: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania; Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 060101 Bucharest, Romania
Gheorghe M: NANOM MEMS SRL, 505400 Rasnov, Romania [ORCID]
Avram M: National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies—IMT Bucharest, 126A Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, 077190 Bucharest, Romania [ORCID]
Adiaconita B: National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies—IMT Bucharest, 126A Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, 077190 Bucharest, Romania
Craciun G: National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies—IMT Bucharest, 126A Erou Iancu Nicolae Street, 077190 Bucharest, Romania
Bocancia Mateescu AL: DDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
4
First Page
723
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-04-08
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10040723, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.20592
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10040723
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
347
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 20, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 20, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.20592
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.08 seconds)
[0.09 s]
