LAPSE:2023.19027
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.19027
Battery Model Identification Approach for Electric Forklift Application
March 9, 2023
Abstract
Electric forklifts are extremely important for the world’s logistics and industry. Lead acid batteries are the most common energy storage system for electric forklifts; however, to ensure more energy efficiency and less environmental pollution, they are starting to use lithium batteries. All lithium batteries need a battery management system (BMS) for safety, long life cycle and better efficiency. This system is capable to estimate the battery state of charge, state of health and state of function, but those cannot be measured directly and must be estimated indirectly using battery models. Consequently, accurate battery models are essential for implementation of advance BMS and enhance its accuracy. This work presents a comparison between four different models, four different types of optimizers algorithms and seven different experiment designs. The purpose is defining the best model, with the best optimizer, and the best experiment design for battery parameter estimation. This best model is intended for a state of charge estimation on a battery applied on an electric forklift. The nonlinear grey box model with the nonlinear least square method presented a better result for this purpose. This model was estimated with the best experiment design which was defined considering the fit to validation data, the parameter standard deviation and the output variance. With this approach, it was possible to reach more than 80% of fit in different validation data, a non-biased and little prediction error and a good one-step ahead result.
Electric forklifts are extremely important for the world’s logistics and industry. Lead acid batteries are the most common energy storage system for electric forklifts; however, to ensure more energy efficiency and less environmental pollution, they are starting to use lithium batteries. All lithium batteries need a battery management system (BMS) for safety, long life cycle and better efficiency. This system is capable to estimate the battery state of charge, state of health and state of function, but those cannot be measured directly and must be estimated indirectly using battery models. Consequently, accurate battery models are essential for implementation of advance BMS and enhance its accuracy. This work presents a comparison between four different models, four different types of optimizers algorithms and seven different experiment designs. The purpose is defining the best model, with the best optimizer, and the best experiment design for battery parameter estimation. This best model is intended for a state of charge estimation on a battery applied on an electric forklift. The nonlinear grey box model with the nonlinear least square method presented a better result for this purpose. This model was estimated with the best experiment design which was defined considering the fit to validation data, the parameter standard deviation and the output variance. With this approach, it was possible to reach more than 80% of fit in different validation data, a non-biased and little prediction error and a good one-step ahead result.
Record ID
Keywords
battery management system, battery models, electric forklift, Hammerstein-Wiener battery model, nonlinear grey box battery model, output error battery model, transfer function battery model
Subject
Suggested Citation
da Silva CT, Dias BMDA, Araújo RE, Pellini EL, Laganá AAM. Battery Model Identification Approach for Electric Forklift Application. (2023). LAPSE:2023.19027
Author Affiliations
da Silva CT: PEA—Polytechnic School (POLI-USP), University of São Paulo, 05508-010 São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Dias BMDA: PEA—Polytechnic School (POLI-USP), University of São Paulo, 05508-010 São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Araújo RE: INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal [ORCID]
Pellini EL: PEA—Polytechnic School (POLI-USP), University of São Paulo, 05508-010 São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Laganá AAM: PEA—Polytechnic School (POLI-USP), University of São Paulo, 05508-010 São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Dias BMDA: PEA—Polytechnic School (POLI-USP), University of São Paulo, 05508-010 São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Araújo RE: INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal [ORCID]
Pellini EL: PEA—Polytechnic School (POLI-USP), University of São Paulo, 05508-010 São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Laganá AAM: PEA—Polytechnic School (POLI-USP), University of São Paulo, 05508-010 São Paulo, Brazil [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
19
First Page
6221
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-09-29
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14196221, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.19027
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196221
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
313
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 9, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 9, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.19027
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
