LAPSE:2023.16336
Published Article
LAPSE:2023.16336
Prediction of Oil Recovery Factor in Stratified Reservoirs after Immiscible Water-Alternating Gas Injection Based on PSO-, GSA-, GWO-, and GA-LSSVM
Pål Østebø Andersen, Jan Inge Nygård, Aizhan Kengessova
March 3, 2023
Abstract
In this study, we solve the challenge of predicting oil recovery factor (RF) in layered heterogeneous reservoirs after 1.5 pore volumes of water-, gas- or water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection. A dataset of ~2500 reservoir simulations is analyzed based on a Black Oil 2D Model with different combinations of reservoir heterogeneity, WAG hysteresis, gravity influence, mobility ratios and WAG ratios. In the first model MOD1, RF is correlated with one input (an effective WAG mobility ratio M*). Good correlation (Pearson coefficient −0.94), but with scatter, motivated a second model MOD2 using eight input parameters: water−oil and gas−oil mobility ratios, water−oil and gas−oil gravity numbers, a reservoir heterogeneity factor, two hysteresis parameters and water fraction. The two mobility ratios exhibited the strongest correlation with RF (Pearson coefficient −0.57 for gas-oil and −0.48 for water-oil). LSSVM was applied in MOD2 and trained using different optimizers: PSO, GA, GWO and GSA. A physics-based adaptation of the dataset was proposed to properly handle the single-phase injection. A total of 70% of the data was used for training, 15% for validation and 15% for testing. GWO and PSO optimized the model equally well (R2 = 0.9965 on the validation set), slightly better than GA and GSA (R2 = 0.9963). The performance metrics for MOD1 in the total dataset were: RMSE = 0.050 and R2 = 0.889; MOD2: RMSE = 0.0080 and R2 = 0.998. WAG outperformed single-phase injection, in some cases with 0.3 units higher RF. The benefits of WAG increased with stronger hysteresis. The LSSVM model could be trained to be less dependent on hysteresis and the non-injected phase during single-phase injection.
Keywords
dimensionless numbers, genetic algorithm (GA), gravitational search algorithm (GSA), grey wolf optimization (GWO), hysteresis, least square support vector machine (LSSVM), particle swarm optimization (PSO), physics-informed machine learning, water-alternating-gas (WAG)
Suggested Citation
Andersen PØ, Nygård JI, Kengessova A. Prediction of Oil Recovery Factor in Stratified Reservoirs after Immiscible Water-Alternating Gas Injection Based on PSO-, GSA-, GWO-, and GA-LSSVM. (2023). LAPSE:2023.16336
Author Affiliations
Andersen PØ: Department of Energy Resources, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway [ORCID]
Nygård JI: Bouvet, 4020 Stavanger, Norway
Kengessova A: Department of Energy Resources, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway; Timal Consulting Group LLP, Atyrau 060011, Kazakhstan
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
2
First Page
656
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-01-17
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15020656, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.16336
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020656
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Mar 3, 2023
Main Article
License
CC BY 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
208
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 3, 2023
 
Verified by curator on
Mar 3, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.16336
 
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version