LAPSE:2023.14371
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.14371
Performance Comparison of LMNO Cathodes Produced with Pullulan or PEDOT:PSS Water-Processable Binders
March 1, 2023
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate lithium metal battery cells assembled with high potential cathodes produced by sustainable processes. Specifically, LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LMNO) electrodes were fabricated using two different water-processable binders: pullulan (PU) or the bifunctional electronically conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). The cell performance was evaluated by voltammetric and galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles at different C-rates with 1M LiPF6 in 1:1 (v:v) ethylene carbonate (EC):dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (LP30) electrolyte and compared to that of cells assembled with LMNO featuring poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVdF). At C/10, the specific capacity of LMNO-PEDOT:PSS and LMNO-PU were, respectively, 130 mAh g−1 and 127 mAh g−1, slightly higher than that of LMNO-PVdF (124 mAh g−1). While the capacity retention at higher C-rates and under repeated cycling of LMNO-PU and LMNO-PVdF electrodes was similar, LMNO-PEDOT:PSS featured superior performance. Indeed, lithium metal cells assembled with PEDOT:PSS featured a capacity retention of 100% over 200 cycles carried out at C/1 and with a high cut-off voltage of 5 V. Overall, this work demonstrates that both the water-processable binders are a valuable alternative to PVdF. In addition, the use of PEDOT:PSS significantly improves the cycle life of the cell, even when high-voltage cathodes are used, therefore demonstrating the feasibility of the production of a green lithium metal battery that can exhibit a specific energy of 400 Wh kg−1, evaluated at the electrode material level. Our work further demonstrates the importance of the use of functional binders in electrode manufacturing.
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate lithium metal battery cells assembled with high potential cathodes produced by sustainable processes. Specifically, LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LMNO) electrodes were fabricated using two different water-processable binders: pullulan (PU) or the bifunctional electronically conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). The cell performance was evaluated by voltammetric and galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles at different C-rates with 1M LiPF6 in 1:1 (v:v) ethylene carbonate (EC):dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (LP30) electrolyte and compared to that of cells assembled with LMNO featuring poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVdF). At C/10, the specific capacity of LMNO-PEDOT:PSS and LMNO-PU were, respectively, 130 mAh g−1 and 127 mAh g−1, slightly higher than that of LMNO-PVdF (124 mAh g−1). While the capacity retention at higher C-rates and under repeated cycling of LMNO-PU and LMNO-PVdF electrodes was similar, LMNO-PEDOT:PSS featured superior performance. Indeed, lithium metal cells assembled with PEDOT:PSS featured a capacity retention of 100% over 200 cycles carried out at C/1 and with a high cut-off voltage of 5 V. Overall, this work demonstrates that both the water-processable binders are a valuable alternative to PVdF. In addition, the use of PEDOT:PSS significantly improves the cycle life of the cell, even when high-voltage cathodes are used, therefore demonstrating the feasibility of the production of a green lithium metal battery that can exhibit a specific energy of 400 Wh kg−1, evaluated at the electrode material level. Our work further demonstrates the importance of the use of functional binders in electrode manufacturing.
Record ID
Keywords
electronically conducting polymer, lithium-ion battery cathode, LMNO, PEDOT:PSS, pullulan, water processable binder
Subject
Suggested Citation
Brilloni A, Marchesini F, Poli F, Petri E, Soavi F. Performance Comparison of LMNO Cathodes Produced with Pullulan or PEDOT:PSS Water-Processable Binders. (2023). LAPSE:2023.14371
Author Affiliations
Brilloni A: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy [ORCID]
Marchesini F: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Poli F: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Petri E: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Soavi F: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy; ENERCube, Centro Ricerche Energia, Ambiente e Mare, Centro Interdipartimentale per la Ricerca Industriale Fonti Rinnovabili, Am [ORCID]
Marchesini F: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Poli F: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Petri E: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Soavi F: Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy; ENERCube, Centro Ricerche Energia, Ambiente e Mare, Centro Interdipartimentale per la Ricerca Industriale Fonti Rinnovabili, Am [ORCID]
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
7
First Page
2608
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-04-02
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15072608, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.14371
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072608
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
175
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 1, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 1, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.14371
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.41 seconds)
