LAPSE:2023.13544
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.13544
Characteristics and Origins of the Difference between the Middle and High Rank Coal in Guizhou and Their Implication for the CBM Exploration and Development Strategy: A Case Study from Dahebian and Dafang Block
March 1, 2023
Abstract
The coalbed methane (CBM) geology in Guizhou is characterized by a high gas content, pressure and resource abundance, indicating superior CBM resource potential. However, there are also many unfavorable factors, such as complex structure geology, significant regional differences in CBM geology, the widespread development of tectonically deformed coal, and the unclear understanding of the configuration of geological factors for CBM enrichment and high yield, which restrict the increase in CBM production and a large-scale development. Taking the Dahebian Block in Liupanshui coal field and the Dafang Block in Qianbei coal field as examples, this study presented the CBM geological differences between middle- and high-rank coals; their origins were analyzed and the effect of depth on gas content and permeability was discussed. A CBM enrichment and high-yield model was illustrated, and the geologic fitness-related exploration and development methods for Guizhou CBM were finally proposed. The results show that (1) significant differences between the middle- and high-rank coals occur in coal occurrence and distribution, coal qualities, and coal reservoir properties. Compared to Dahebian coal, Dafang coal has a higher coal rank, vitrinite content, and gas content, but a lower number of coal layers and permeability. (2) The sedimentary−tectonic evolution of the Longtan coal-bearing sequence is the fundamental reason for CBM geological differences between the Dadebian Block and Dafang Block, consisting of coal occurrence, qualities, maceral, rank, structure, and their associated reservoir properties. (3) The coordinated variation of gas content and permeability contributes to a greater depth for CBM enrichment and a high yield of the middle-rank coal. It is suggested that the best depths for CBM enrichment and high yield in Guizhou are 600−800 m for the middle-rank coal and 500 m for the high-rank coal, respectively. (4) Considering the bottleneck of inefficient CBM development in Guizhou, we proposed three CBM assessment and development technologies, including the CBM optimization of the classification−hierarchical optimization−analytical hierarchy, multiple coal seams commingling production with the pressure relief of tectonically deformed coal, and surface−underground CBM three-dimensional drainage development. The aim of this study was to provide new insights into the efficient exploration and development of CBM in Guizhou.
The coalbed methane (CBM) geology in Guizhou is characterized by a high gas content, pressure and resource abundance, indicating superior CBM resource potential. However, there are also many unfavorable factors, such as complex structure geology, significant regional differences in CBM geology, the widespread development of tectonically deformed coal, and the unclear understanding of the configuration of geological factors for CBM enrichment and high yield, which restrict the increase in CBM production and a large-scale development. Taking the Dahebian Block in Liupanshui coal field and the Dafang Block in Qianbei coal field as examples, this study presented the CBM geological differences between middle- and high-rank coals; their origins were analyzed and the effect of depth on gas content and permeability was discussed. A CBM enrichment and high-yield model was illustrated, and the geologic fitness-related exploration and development methods for Guizhou CBM were finally proposed. The results show that (1) significant differences between the middle- and high-rank coals occur in coal occurrence and distribution, coal qualities, and coal reservoir properties. Compared to Dahebian coal, Dafang coal has a higher coal rank, vitrinite content, and gas content, but a lower number of coal layers and permeability. (2) The sedimentary−tectonic evolution of the Longtan coal-bearing sequence is the fundamental reason for CBM geological differences between the Dadebian Block and Dafang Block, consisting of coal occurrence, qualities, maceral, rank, structure, and their associated reservoir properties. (3) The coordinated variation of gas content and permeability contributes to a greater depth for CBM enrichment and a high yield of the middle-rank coal. It is suggested that the best depths for CBM enrichment and high yield in Guizhou are 600−800 m for the middle-rank coal and 500 m for the high-rank coal, respectively. (4) Considering the bottleneck of inefficient CBM development in Guizhou, we proposed three CBM assessment and development technologies, including the CBM optimization of the classification−hierarchical optimization−analytical hierarchy, multiple coal seams commingling production with the pressure relief of tectonically deformed coal, and surface−underground CBM three-dimensional drainage development. The aim of this study was to provide new insights into the efficient exploration and development of CBM in Guizhou.
Record ID
Keywords
different CBM geology, enrichment and high yield model, exploration and development strategy, middle and high rank coal, tectonism and sedimentation
Subject
Suggested Citation
Zhao F, Sang S, Han S, Wu Z, Zhang J, Xiang W, Xu A. Characteristics and Origins of the Difference between the Middle and High Rank Coal in Guizhou and Their Implication for the CBM Exploration and Development Strategy: A Case Study from Dahebian and Dafang Block. (2023). LAPSE:2023.13544
Author Affiliations
Zhao F: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Evaluation and Development in Complex Tectonic Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guiyang 550081, China;
Sang S: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Carbon Neutrality Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control [ORCID]
Han S: Carbon Neutrality Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China [ORCID]
Wu Z: Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Evaluation and Development in Complex Tectonic Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guiyang 550081, China; Guizhou Engineering Research Institute of Oil & Gas Exploration and Development, Guiyang 550081, China
Zhang J: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Xiang W: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Xu A: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Sang S: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; Carbon Neutrality Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control [ORCID]
Han S: Carbon Neutrality Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China [ORCID]
Wu Z: Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Evaluation and Development in Complex Tectonic Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guiyang 550081, China; Guizhou Engineering Research Institute of Oil & Gas Exploration and Development, Guiyang 550081, China
Zhang J: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Xiang W: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Xu A: School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
15
Issue
9
First Page
3181
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-04-27
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en15093181, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.13544
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093181
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
182
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 1, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 1, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.13544
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
