Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0484
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0484
Foundation Model-Guided Optimization of Chemical Reaction Spaces for Autonomous Experimentation
Youhyun Kim, Jonggeol Na
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The optimization of chemical reactions requires navigating a high-dimensional design space composed of both discrete and continuous variables. Although one-hot encoding has been widely adopted, it lacks chemically meaningful information and suffers from sparsity and poor generalization. To address these limitations, we explored the use of pretrained molecular foundation models to generate latent representations as input variables for optimization. However, rigorously comparing different combinations of reaction representations and optimization algorithms remains a time- and resource-intensive challenge. In this work, we developed an end-to-end benchmarking platform that systematically evaluates diverse encoding schemes and optimization strategies under identical conditions. The platform automates the entire workflow from data preprocessing to result analysis, supporting fair comparison across multiple representation-optimizer combinations. Furthermore, we designed a custom reaction representation that integrates a 3D equivariant encoder with a bidirectional cross-attention module to explicitly capture interactions between reaction components. The proposed platform provides a scalable foundation for reaction optimization and advances the feasibility of autonomous experimental systems.
Keywords
Autonomous experimentation, Benchmarking platform, Black-box optimization, Molecular representation, Reaction optimization
Suggested Citation
Kim Y, Na J. Foundation Model-Guided Optimization of Chemical Reaction Spaces for Autonomous Experimentation. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2252-2260 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.101097
Author Affiliations
Kim Y: Ewha Womans University, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea. Ewha Womans University, Graduate Program in System Health Science and Engineering, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea. Ewha Womans University, In
Na J: Ewha Womans University, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea. Ewha Womans University, Graduate Program in System Health Science and Engineering, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea. Ewha Womans University, In
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2252
Last Page
2260
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2252-2260-407-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0484
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.101097
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
223
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0484
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Rinehart NI, Saunthwal RK, Wellauer J, Zahrt AF, Schlemper L, Shved AS, Bigler R, Fantasia S, Denmark SE. A machine-learning tool to predict substrate-adaptive conditions for pd-catalyzed C-N couplings. Science 381:965-972 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg2114
  2. Shields BJ, Stevens J, Li J, Parasram M, Damani F, Alvarado JIM, Janey JM, Adams RP, Doyle AG. Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590:89-96 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03213-y
  3. Kim Y, Doo H, Shin D, Lee SY, Roh Y, Park S, Song H, Jung Y, Yoo HJ, Han SS, Kim JW, Besenhard MO, Lee YS, Na J. Self-driving laboratories with artificial intelligence: an overview of process systems engineering perspective. Computers & Chemical Engineering 203:109266 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109266
  4. Rankovi? B, Griffiths RR, Moss HB, Schwaller P. Bayesian optimisation for additive screening and yield improvements - beyond one-hot encoding. Digital Discovery 3:654-666 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1039/d3dd00096f
  5. Wigh DS, Goodman JM, Lapkin AA. A review of molecular representation in the age of machine learning. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 12: (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1603
  6. Kwon Y, Jung Y, Choi YS, Kang S. Interpretation of chemical reaction yields with graph neural additive network. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 6:025054 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/addfaa
  7. Shi R, Yu G, Chen L, Yang Y. Yieldfcp: enhancing reaction yield prediction via fine-grained cross-modal pre-training. Artificial Intelligence Chemistry 3:100085 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aichem.2025.100085
  8. Ross J, Belgodere B, Chenthamarakshan V, Padhi I, Mroueh Y, Das P. Large-scale chemical language representations capture molecular structure and properties. Nat Mach Intell 4:1256-1264 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00580-7
  9. Li H, Zhang R, Min Y, Ma D, Zhao D, Zeng J. A knowledge-guided pre-training framework for improving molecular representation learning. Nat Commun 14: (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43214-1
  10. Wood, B.M., et al. Uma: A family of universal models for atoms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23971: (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.23971
  11. Ni Y, Feng S, Hong X, Sun Y, Ma WY, Ma ZM, Ye Q, Lan Y. Pre-training with fractional denoising to enhance molecular property prediction. Nat Mach Intell 6:1169-1178 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00900-z
  12. Adrian, M., et al. Multitask finetuning and acceleration of chemical pretrained models for small molecule drug property prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12719: (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.12719
  13. Soares E, Vital Brazil E, Shirasuna V, Zubarev D, Cerqueira R, Schmidt K. An open-source family of large encoder-decoder foundation models for chemistry. Commun Chem 8: (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-025-01585-0
  14. Binois M, Wycoff N. A survey on high-dimensional gaussian process modeling with application to bayesian optimization. ACM Trans. Evol. Learn. Optim. 2:1-26 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1145/3545611
  15. Häse F, Aldeghi M, Hickman RJ, Roch LM, Aspuru-Guzik A. Gryffin: an algorithm for bayesian optimization of categorical variables informed by expert knowledge. Applied Physics Reviews 8: (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048164
  16. Balandat, M., et al. Botorch: A framework for efficient monte-carlo bayesian optimization. Advances in neural information processing systems 33:21524-21538 (2020) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.06403
  17. Bertelsen, S., et al. Processoptimizer, an open-source python package for easy optimization of real-world processes using bayesian optimization: Showcase of features and example of use. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 65:1702-1707 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02240
  18. Hickman RJ, Sim M, Pablo-García S, Tom G, Woolhouse I, Hao H, Bao Z, Bannigan P, Allen C, Aldeghi M, Aspuru-Guzik A. Atlas: a brain for self-driving laboratories. Digital Discovery 4:1006-1029 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dd00115j
  19. De Rainville FM, Fortin FA, Gardner MA, Parizeau M, Gagné C. DEAP. Proceedings of the 14th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation :85-92 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1145/2330784.2330799
  20. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks 4:1942-1948 (None) https://doi.org/10.1109/icnn.1995.488968
  21. Hansen, N. The cma evolution strategy: A tutorial. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00772: (2016) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1604.00772
  22. Beck AG, Iyer S, Fine J, Chopra G. Paddy: an evolutionary optimization algorithm for chemical systems and spaces. Digital Discovery 4:1352-1371 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dd00226a
  23. Audet C, Dennis JE Jr. Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 17:188-217 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1137/040603371
  24. Jones DR, Perttunen CD, Stuckman BE. Lipschitzian optimization without the lipschitz constant. J Optim Theory Appl 79:157-181 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00941892
  25. Powell, M.J. The bobyqa algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06, University of Cambridge, Cambridge 26:26-46 (2009)
  26. Huyer W, Neumaier A. SNOBFIT -- stable noisy optimization by branch and fit. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 35:1-25 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1145/1377612.1377613
  27. Ma K, Rios LM, Bhosekar A, Sahinidis NV, Rajagopalan S. Branch-and-model: a derivative-free global optimization algorithm. Comput Optim Appl 85:337-367 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-023-00466-3
  28. Zhu M, Mroz A, Gui L, Jelfs KE, Bemporad A, del Río Chanona EA, Lee YS. Discrete and mixed-variable experimental design with surrogate-based approach. Digital Discovery 3:2589-2606 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dd00113c
  29. Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organoboron compounds. Chem. Rev. 95:2457-2483 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00039a007
  30. Perera D, Tucker JW, Brahmbhatt S, Helal CJ, Chong A, Farrell W, Richardson P, Sach NW. A platform for automated nanomole-scale reaction screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flow. Science 359:429-434 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9112
  31. Lima CFRAC, Rodrigues ASMC, Silva VLM, Silva AMS, Santos LMNBF. Role of the base and control of selectivity in the suzuki-miyaura cross?coupling reaction. ChemCatChem 6:1291-1302 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201301080
  32. Zhang H, Kwong FY, Tian Y, Chan KS. Base and cation effects on the suzuki cross-coupling of bulky arylboronic acid with halopyridines: synthesis of pyridylphenols. J. Org. Chem. 63:6886-6890 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1021/jo980646y
  33. Thomas AA, Denmark SE. Pre-transmetalation intermediates in the suzuki-miyaura reaction revealed: the missing link. Science 352:329-332 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6981
  34. Ruiz-Castillo P, Buchwald SL. Applications of palladium-catalyzed C-N cross-coupling reactions. Chem. Rev. 116:12564-12649 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00512
  35. Ahneman DT, Estrada JG, Lin S, Dreher SD, Doyle AG. Predicting reaction performance in C-N cross-coupling using machine learning. Science 360:186-190 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar5169
  36. Kania MJ, Reyes A, Neufeldt SR. Oxidative addition of (hetero)aryl (pseudo)halides at palladium(0): origin and significance of divergent mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146:19249-19260 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c04496
  37. Morgan R, Gallagher M. Analysing and characterising optimization problems using length scale. Soft Comput 21:1735-1752 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-1878-z
(0.1 seconds)

[0.11 s]