LAPSE:2026.0479
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0479
Set-based Formulations for the State Task Network Scheduling Problem
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The state task network (STN) representation is a widely used modeling approach for optimal multipurpose batch production scheduling. In practice, STNs have been traditionally formulated as mixed-integer programming (MIP) problems and solved using general-purpose MIP solvers relying on branch-and-bound and branch-and-cut. In the meantime, alternative modeling and solution paradigms for optimization have been developed, enabling the incorporation of alternative variable types and optimization algorithms. Specifically, this work relies on the Hexaly software, which introduced set-based models and their solution through general-purpose hybrid algorithms, i.e., methods that combine traditional MIP with constraint programming, local search, large neighborhood search, among other tools. So far, Hexaly has shown promising results when tackling optimal scheduling problems, however, set-based models and solution approaches for STN optimization have not been studied in the literature. Aiming to fill this gap, this work introduces the first set-based models for the STN problem and performs preliminary benchmarking tests with Hexaly's general-purpose hybrid algorithms. Results from two case studies suggest that set-based models may perform better than the traditional MIP STN formulation when dealing with a simple STN with sequential connectivity and a long-term scheduling instance of a STN with fixed integer batching variables. Overall, this work establishes the foundations for advancing research on set-based approaches for network scheduling, opening new directions beyond traditional MIP optimization.
The state task network (STN) representation is a widely used modeling approach for optimal multipurpose batch production scheduling. In practice, STNs have been traditionally formulated as mixed-integer programming (MIP) problems and solved using general-purpose MIP solvers relying on branch-and-bound and branch-and-cut. In the meantime, alternative modeling and solution paradigms for optimization have been developed, enabling the incorporation of alternative variable types and optimization algorithms. Specifically, this work relies on the Hexaly software, which introduced set-based models and their solution through general-purpose hybrid algorithms, i.e., methods that combine traditional MIP with constraint programming, local search, large neighborhood search, among other tools. So far, Hexaly has shown promising results when tackling optimal scheduling problems, however, set-based models and solution approaches for STN optimization have not been studied in the literature. Aiming to fill this gap, this work introduces the first set-based models for the STN problem and performs preliminary benchmarking tests with Hexaly's general-purpose hybrid algorithms. Results from two case studies suggest that set-based models may perform better than the traditional MIP STN formulation when dealing with a simple STN with sequential connectivity and a long-term scheduling instance of a STN with fixed integer batching variables. Overall, this work establishes the foundations for advancing research on set-based approaches for network scheduling, opening new directions beyond traditional MIP optimization.
Record ID
Keywords
Subject
Suggested Citation
Liñán DA, Stinchfield G, Laird CD, Kronqvist J. Set-based Formulations for the State Task Network Scheduling Problem. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2209-2217 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.154989
Author Affiliations
Liñán DA: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics, Stockholm, SE-10044, Sweden [ORCID]
Stinchfield G: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA-15213, USA [ORCID]
Laird CD: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA-15213, USA
Kronqvist J: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics, Stockholm, SE-10044, Sweden [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Stinchfield G: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA-15213, USA [ORCID]
Laird CD: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA-15213, USA
Kronqvist J: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics, Stockholm, SE-10044, Sweden [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2209
Last Page
2217
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2209-2217-358-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0479
This Record
Data

LAPSE:2026.0003
Data for: Set-based Formulations fo...
Software or Source Code

LAPSE:2026.0002
Source code for: Set-based Formulat...
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.154989
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
471
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0479
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Publisher Version
References Cited
- Agnetis A, Billaut JC, Pinedo M, Shabtay D. Fifty years of research in scheduling - theory and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 327:367-393 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.01.034
- Kondili E, Pantelides CC, Sargent RWH. A general algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch operations-i. MILP formulation. Computers & Chemical Engineering 17:211-227 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(93)80015-f
- C.C. Pantelides. Unified frameworks for optimal process planning and scheduling. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Foundations of Computer Aided Operations. CACHE (1994)
- Maravelias CT. Chemical production scheduling. Cambridge University Press (2021) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650998
- Méndez CA, Cerdá J, Grossmann IE, Harjunkoski I, Fahl M. State-of-the-art review of optimization methods for short-term scheduling of batch processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering 30:913-946 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.02.008
- Samadi A, Maravelias CT. A comprehensive chemical production scheduling representation. Computers & Chemical Engineering 181:108552 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108552
- Lekkerkerk K. Scheduling optimization in a refinery for vegetable oils. TU Delft (2020)
- Moniz S, Barbosa-Póvoa AP, de Sousa JP. Simultaneous regular and non-regular production scheduling of multipurpose batch plants: a real chemical-pharmaceutical case study. Computers & Chemical Engineering 67:83-102 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.03.017
- Huang Y, Su R, Yang J, Li J, Du Z, Huang Z. An intelligent electricity scheduling model for cement plants based on STN. 2024 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Power Science and Technology (ICPST) :618-624 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/icpst61417.2024.10602163
- Georgiadis GP, Elekidis AP, Georgiadis MC. Optimization-based scheduling for the process industries: from theory to real-life industrial applications. Processes 7:438 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070438
- Perez HD, Amaran S, Iyer SS, Wassick JM, Grossmann IE. Applications of the RTN scheduling model in the chemical industry. Simulation and Optimization in Process Engineering :365-400 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85043-8.00006-4
- Mostafaei H, Harjunkoski I. Continuous?time scheduling formulation for multipurpose batch plants. AIChE Journal 66: (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16804
- Castro PM, Grossmann IE. Generalized disjunctive programming as a systematic modeling framework to derive scheduling formulations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51:5781-5792 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2030486
- Blaise L, Artigues C, Benoist T. Solution repair by inequality network propagation in localsolver. Lecture Notes in Computer Science :332-345 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58112-1_23
- Grapendal L, Hirn C. Mathematical Optimization of Scheduling Problems: A State-Task Network and Mixed Integer Linear Programming Approach. KTH (2025)
- Velez S, Maravelias CT. Reformulations and branching methods for mixed-integer programming chemical production scheduling models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:3832-3841 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303421h
- Laborie P. Bornes rapides pour l'ordonnancement dans LocalSolver. ROADEF (2023)
- Abreu LR. Mixed-integer versus constraint programming solvers. Proceeding Series of the Brazilian Society of Computational and Applied Mathematics : (2026) https://doi.org/10.5540/03.2026.012.01.0308
(0.15 seconds)
[0.15 s]

