LAPSE:2026.0464
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0464
Reinforcement Learning-driven Process Intensification Synthesis - Design and Optimization of Reaction/Separation Systems
June 12, 2026
Abstract
This work aims to systematically generate intensified process designs by integrating reinforcement learning (RL)-driven process synthesis and phenomena-based modeling via Generalized Modular Framework (GMF). Rather than considering flowsheet synthesis with conventional unit-operations, GMF utilizes fundamental building blocks, also known as mass and heat exchange modules, to describe the physiochemical phenomena and to enhance novel process discovery. At its core are driving forces which characterize the mass transfer feasibility based on the total change in Gibbs free energy of the system. RL is integrated with this phenomena-based modeling strategy to drive flowsheet generation by exploring much of the total action space and minimizing pre-postulation of stream connections. All possible inlets, outlets, and interconnections between modules are contained in a stream matrix. Deep Q-Network is used as the RL agent, which contains a multi-layer convolution neural network followed by a multi-layer feedforward neural network. This network computes q values for each possible stream connection contained in the stream matrix and determines an optimal action from the maximum q-value (e.g., varying the stream interconnections). New designs can thus be generated and iteratively improved. This approach is demonstrated using two case studies: (1) binary separation of benzene and toluene, and (2) membrane-assisted reaction for methanol production.
This work aims to systematically generate intensified process designs by integrating reinforcement learning (RL)-driven process synthesis and phenomena-based modeling via Generalized Modular Framework (GMF). Rather than considering flowsheet synthesis with conventional unit-operations, GMF utilizes fundamental building blocks, also known as mass and heat exchange modules, to describe the physiochemical phenomena and to enhance novel process discovery. At its core are driving forces which characterize the mass transfer feasibility based on the total change in Gibbs free energy of the system. RL is integrated with this phenomena-based modeling strategy to drive flowsheet generation by exploring much of the total action space and minimizing pre-postulation of stream connections. All possible inlets, outlets, and interconnections between modules are contained in a stream matrix. Deep Q-Network is used as the RL agent, which contains a multi-layer convolution neural network followed by a multi-layer feedforward neural network. This network computes q values for each possible stream connection contained in the stream matrix and determines an optimal action from the maximum q-value (e.g., varying the stream interconnections). New designs can thus be generated and iteratively improved. This approach is demonstrated using two case studies: (1) binary separation of benzene and toluene, and (2) membrane-assisted reaction for methanol production.
Record ID
Subject
Suggested Citation
Nice D, Ribeiro DW, Savitskaya K, Bindlish R, Pistikopoulos EN, Tian Y. Reinforcement Learning-driven Process Intensification Synthesis - Design and Optimization of Reaction/Separation Systems. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2091-2098 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.168270
Author Affiliations
Nice D: West Virginia University, Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Ribeiro DW: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States. Texas A&M University, Texas A&M Energy Institute, College Station, Texas, United States
Savitskaya K: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States. Texas A&M University, Texas A&M Energy Institute, College Station, Texas, United States
Bindlish R: The Dow Chemical Company, Technical Expertise and Support Technology Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Pistikopoulos EN: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States. Texas A&M University, Texas A&M Energy Institute, College Station, Texas, United States
Tian Y: West Virginia University, Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Ribeiro DW: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States. Texas A&M University, Texas A&M Energy Institute, College Station, Texas, United States
Savitskaya K: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States. Texas A&M University, Texas A&M Energy Institute, College Station, Texas, United States
Bindlish R: The Dow Chemical Company, Technical Expertise and Support Technology Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Pistikopoulos EN: Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, Texas, United States. Texas A&M University, Texas A&M Energy Institute, College Station, Texas, United States
Tian Y: West Virginia University, Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2091
Last Page
2098
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2091-2098-249-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0464
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.168270
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
269
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0464
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Tian Y, Demirel SE, Hasan MMF, Pistikopoulos EN. An overview of process systems engineering approaches for process intensification: state of the art. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 133:160-210 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.07.014
- Ramírez-Márquez C, Al-Thubaiti MM, Martín M, El-Halwagi MM, Ponce-Ortega JM. Processes intensification for sustainability: prospects and opportunities. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62:2428-2443 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04305
- Patel BA, Pereira CS. Process intensification at scale: an industrial perspective. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 181:109098 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.109098
- Khan AA, Lapkin AA. Designing the process designer: hierarchical reinforcement learning for optimisation-based process design. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 180:108885 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.108885
- Wang D, Bao J, Zamarripa-Perez MA, Paul B, Chen Y, Gao P, Ma T, Noring AA, Iyengar AKS, Schwartz DT, Eggleton EE, He Q, Liu A, Marina OA, Koeppel B, Xu Z. A coupled reinforcement learning and IDAES process modeling framework for automated conceptual design of energy and chemical systems. Energy Adv. 2:1735-1751 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ya00310h
- Gao Q, Schweidtmann AM. Deep reinforcement learning for process design: review and perspective. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 44:101012 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2024.101012
- Reynoso?Donzelli S, Ricardez?Sandoval LA. A reinforcement learning approach with masked agents for chemical process flowsheet design. AIChE Journal 71: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18584
- Pistikopoulos EN, Tian Y. Computer-aided modular process intensification: design, synthesis, and operability. Synthesis and Operability Strategies for Computer-Aided Modular Process Intensification :19-41 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-32-385587-7.00011-7
- Tian Y, Pistikopoulos EN. Synthesis of operable process intensification systems-steady-state design with safety and operability considerations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58:6049-6068 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04389
- Tian, Y., Akintola, A., & Akoh, B. (2023). A Process Design, Intensification, and Modularization Approach for Membrane-Assisted Reaction Systems. In Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. (Vol. 52, pp. 3159-3164). Elsevier.
- Tian Y, Akintola A, Jiang Y, Wang D, Bao J, Zamarripa MA, Paul B, Chen Y, Gao P, Noring A, Iyengar A, Liu A, Marina O, Koeppel B, Xu Z. Reinforcement learning-driven process design: a hydrodealkylation example. Systems and Control Transactions 3:387-393 (2024) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.119603
- Proios P, Pistikopoulos EN. Generalized modular framework for the representation and synthesis of complex distillation column sequences. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44:4656-4675 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie040163m
- Hamedi H, Brinkmann T, Shishatskiy S. Membrane-assisted methanol synthesis processes and the required permselectivity. Membranes 11:596 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080596
- Bussche KMV, Froment GF. A steady-state kinetic model for methanol synthesis and the water gas shift reaction on a commercial cu/zno/al2o3catalyst. Journal of Catalysis 161:1-10 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1996.0156
(0.1 seconds)
[0.1 s]

