Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0456
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0456
Discrete multi-criteria optimisation of a modular heterogeneous electrolysis system
Hannes Lange, Lukas Furtner, Michael Große, Isabell Viedt, Leon Urbas
June 12, 2026
Abstract
To effectively distribute power to a system of multiple electrolyzer stack units, control strategies have been developed that now need to be applied to heterogeneous electrolysis systems. These are the 'segment principle', the 'slow start principle' and the 'start-stop principle'. As there are many possible combinations to the system composition of a modular heterogeneous electrolysis system together with the most suitable control strategy, a discrete multi-criteria optimisation problem can be formulated. To solve this discrete multi-criteria optimisation problem, two discrete decision variables are introduced. One is the electrolysis system composition, represented by the power ratio/configuration (C). A total of 17 different configurations were used for this, consisting of different proportions of alkaline electrolysis (AEL) and proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEMEL). The other one are the control strategies (R). For the control strategies, the conventional strategies, mentioned above, have been adjusted to deal with the heterogeneity of the electrolysis system. Variations are made in the priorization of certain technologies for power distribution and the availability of a base load operation. The objective function was designed to be the weighted sum of the three highest ranked decision criteria in the categories 'flexibility', 'cost', and 'process engineering' from an empirical expert survey, which led to the respective decision criteria LGC, LCOH and the reciprocal of ?sys. The weights were derived from the ranking, a global grid search identified the combination of (R) and (C) which will be discussed in the paper together with a detailed analysis of the optimization problem.
Keywords
Discrete, Energy Systems, Hydrogen, Modular Heterogeneous Systems, Multi-Criteria, Optimization
Suggested Citation
Lange H, Furtner L, Große M, Viedt I, Urbas L. Discrete multi-criteria optimisation of a modular heterogeneous electrolysis system. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2029-2035 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.135021
Author Affiliations
Lange H: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Furtner L: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Große M: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Viedt I: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Urbas L: Technische Universität Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Saxony, Germany
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2029
Last Page
2035
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2029-2035-191-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0456
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.135021
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
277
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0456
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Mock M, Viedt I, Lange H, Urbas L. Heterogenous electrolysis plants as enabler of efficient and flexible Power-to-X value chains. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., vol. 53, Elsevier; 2024, p. 1885-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50315-X
  2. Lange H, Gro?e M, Viedt I, Urbas L. Modular and heterogeneous electrolysis systems: a system flexibility comparison. Systems and Control Transactions 4:759-764 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.177861
  3. Lange H, Meltzner FM, Große M, Viedt I, Klose A, Urbas L. Design of a modular and heterogeneous electrolysis system to increase flexibility in the use case of direct iron reduction. Energy Reports 15:108801 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.11.060
  4. Chernikova OP, Zlatitskaya YA. Resource efficiency of metallurgical production. Steel Transl. 52:561-567 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3103/s0967091222060031
  5. Chatenet M, Pollet BG, Dekel DR, Dionigi F, Deseure J, Millet P, Braatz RD, Bazant MZ, Eikerling M, Staffell I, Balcombe P, Shao-Horn Y, Schäfer H. Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51:4583-4762 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01079k
  6. Lange H, Klose A, Beisswenger L, Erdmann D, Urbas L. Modularization approach for large-scale electrolysis systems: a review. Sustainable Energy Fuels 8:1208-1224 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1039/d3se01588b
  7. Lange H, Meltzner FM, Große M, Viedt I, Klose A, Urbas L. Design of a modular and heterogeneous electrolysis system to increase flexibility in the use case of direct iron reduction. Energy Reports 15:108801 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.11.060
  8. Sá Rêgo PM. Mcintyre, L. (2018). post-truth. cambridge, MA: MIT press. MJ 19:333-335 (2019) https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_34_25
  9. Lange H, Klose A, Lippmann W, Urbas L. Technical evaluation of the flexibility of water electrolysis systems to increase energy flexibility: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48:15771-15783 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.044
  10. Lange H, Schirmer C, Mock M, Viedt I, Klose A, Urbas L. Operation strategies for modular large-scale alkaline electrolysis systems. 2024 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) :1-7 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/indin58382.2024.10774361
  11. Lange H, Gro?e M, Viedt I, Urbas L. Modular and heterogeneous electrolysis systems: a system flexibility comparison. Systems and Control Transactions 4:759-764 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.177861
  12. Gro?e M, Viedt I, Lange H, Urbas L. Dynamic operability analysis of modular heterogeneous electrolyzer plants using system co-simulation. Systems and Control Transactions 4:53-59 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.102556
  13. Mohr S, Schmidt-Achert T, Ziemsky V, Pichlmaier S. Von der Theorie zur Praxis: Warum grüner Wasserstoff teurer ist als gedacht. Forschungsstelle für Energiewirtschaft (FfE); 2025.
  14. Hoffmann B, Ziemsky V, Mohr S. Was kostet das „Grün" im Wasserstoff? Forschungsstelle für Energiewirtschaft (FfE); 2025.
  15. Liu J, Bao X, Zhou Y, Xu Z, Guo W, Wu J, Guan X. Optimizing the design of combined alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolyzers to fully utilize fluctuating renewable energy. 2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) :335-340 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/case59546.2024.10711405
  16. Große M. H2Giga-eModule-Simulationsmodelle, https://github.com/p2o-lab/H2Giga-eModule-standard-integration-profile 2025.
  17. Sakas G, Ibáñez-Rioja A, Ruuskanen V, Kosonen A, Ahola J, Bergmann O. Dynamic energy and mass balance model for an industrial alkaline water electrolyzer plant process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:4328-4345 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.126
  18. sakthimurugan V, Lakshmikanth G, Balaji N, Roopashree R, Kumar D, Devarajan Y. Green hydrogen revolution: advancing electrolysis, market integration, and sustainable energy transitions towards a net-zero future. Results in Engineering 26:104849 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104849
  19. Rezaei M, Akimov A, Gray EMA. Levelised cost of dynamic green hydrogen production: a case study for australia's hydrogen hubs. Applied Energy 370:123645 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123645
  20. SMARD B für E Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen. Energiemarkt aktuell - Entwicklung der Industriestrompreise. 2025.
  21. Lange H, Schirmer C, Mock M, Viedt I, Klose A, Urbas L. Operation strategies for modular large-scale alkaline electrolysis systems. 2024 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) :1-7 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/indin58382.2024.10774361
  22. Buttler A, Spliethoff H. Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82:2440-2454 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003
(0.11 seconds)

[0.11 s]