Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0374
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0374
Multi-scale Metabolic Modeling and Simulation
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Biological systems are governed by coupled interactions between intracellular metabolism and bioreactor operation that span multiple time scales. Constraint-based metabolic models are widely used to describe intracellular metabolism, but repeatedly solving the optimization problem at each time step in dynamic models introduces numerical challenges related to infeasibility and computational efficiency. This work presents a multi-scale modeling framework that integrates genome-scale, constraint-based metabolic models with dynamic bioreactor simulations. Intracellular metabolism is described using positive flux variables in a parsimonious flux balance analysis, and the resulting embedded optimization problem is replaced by a neural network surrogate. The surrogate provides a smooth approximation of the embedded optimization mapping and eliminates repeated linear program solves during simulation. The approach is demonstrated for fed-batch fermentation of Escherichia coli, in which the surrogate model yields intracellular fluxes under substrate-limited conditions, whereas the underlying linear program would otherwise be infeasible. The framework provides a continuous representation of intracellular metabolism suitable for dynamic simulation of genome-scale models in bioreactor configurations.
Suggested Citation
Carstensen PE, Groves T, Nielsen LK, Krühne U, Gernaey KV, Jørgensen JB. Multi-scale Metabolic Modeling and Simulation. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1353-1359 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.196453
Author Affiliations
Carstensen PE: Technical University of Denmark, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
Groves T: Technical University of Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation Biotechnology Research Institute for the Green Transition, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
Nielsen LK: Technical University of Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation Biotechnology Research Institute for the Green Transition, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
Krühne U: Technical University of Denmark, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
Gernaey KV: Technical University of Denmark, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
Jørgensen JB: Technical University of Denmark, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1353
Last Page
1359
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1353-1359-549-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0374
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.196453
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
214
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0374
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Yasemi M, Jolicoeur M. Modelling cell metabolism: a review on constraint-based steady-state and kinetic approaches. Processes 9:322 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020322
  2. Mahnert C, Oyarzún DA, Berrios J. Multiscale modelling of bioprocess dynamics and cellular growth. Microb Cell Fact 23: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02581-0
  3. Corrao M, He H, Liebermeister W, Noor E, Bar-Even A. A compact model of escherichia coli core and biosynthetic metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol 21:e1013564 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013564
  4. Orth JD, Fleming RMT, Palsson BØ. Reconstruction and use of microbial metabolic networks: the core escherichia coli metabolic model as an educational guide. EcoSal Plus 4: (2010) https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.10.2.1
  5. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle FJ III. Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in escherichia coli. Biophysical Journal 83:1331-1340 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)73903-9
  6. Gomez JA, Höffner K, Barton PI. Dfbalab: a fast and reliable MATLAB code for dynamic flux balance analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 15: (2014) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0409-8
  7. The Economic Cell Collective. Economic Principles in Cell Biology. (2026).
  8. Klamt S, von Kamp A. Analyzing and resolving infeasibility in flux balance analysis of metabolic networks. Metabolites 12:585 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12070585
  9. Scott F, Wilson P, Conejeros R, Vassiliadis VS. Simulation and optimization of dynamic flux balance analysis models using an interior point method reformulation. Computers & Chemical Engineering 119:152-170 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.08.041
  10. Faure L, Mollet B, Liebermeister W, Faulon JL. A neural-mechanistic hybrid approach improving the predictive power of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Commun 14: (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40380-0
  11. Sahu A, Blätke MA, Szyma?ski JJ, Töpfer N. Advances in flux balance analysis by integrating machine learning and mechanism-based models. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19:4626-4640 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.004
  12. Varma A, Palsson BO. Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type escherichia coli W3110. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3724-3731 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.10.3724-3731.1994
  13. Palsson BØ. Systems biology. Cambridge University Press (2015) https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139854610
  14. Lewis NE, Hixson KK, Conrad TM, Lerman JA, Charusanti P, Polpitiya AD, Adkins JN, Schramm G, Purvine SO, Lopez?Ferrer D, Weitz KK, Eils R, König R, Smith RD, Palsson BØ. Omic data from evolved e. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome?scale models. Molecular Systems Biology 6: (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.47
  15. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York, (2006).
  16. Bezanson J, Edelman A, Karpinski S, Shah VB. Julia: a fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev. 59:65-98 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671
  17. Gandhi D, Innes M, Saba E, Fischer K, Shah V. Julia e flux: modernizando o aprendizado de máquina. Computação Brasil :41-45 (2019) https://doi.org/10.5753/compbr.2019.39.4527
  18. Innes M. Flux: elegant machine learning with julia. JOSS 3:602 (2018) https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00602
  19. Merzbacher C, Mac Aodha O, Oyarzún DA. Modeling host-pathway dynamics at the genome scale with machine learning. Metabolic Engineering 91:480-491 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2025.05.008
(0.1 seconds)

[0.1 s]