Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0355
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0355
Addressing Matrix Effects Through A Physical Prior-Informed Calibration Model For Quantitative Analysis
Onur C. Boy, Ulderico Di Caprio, Idelfonso Nogueira, M. Enis Leblebici
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Building a robust calibration curve is essential for accurate quantification of multicomponent mixtures. Matrix effects can distort the proportional relationship between the analyte concentration and instrumental response. In addition, classical machine learning models do not inherently incorporate simple physical constraints, such as the requirement that a zero response must correspond to a zero concentration, which can result in non-zero predictions. To address this limitations, prior-induced calibration models were proposed that inherently embed this physical constraint into the model architecture. A dataset was generated for ethanol electrooxidation products using headspace gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS). Multiple linear regression (MLR), polynomial regression and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained to investigate the effects of model complexity and the incorporation of physical information on predictive performance. Model selection and complexity were assessed using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The prior-induced polynomial regression model achieved improved predictive accuracy while maintaining low model complexity, whereas the ANN provided comparable accuracy but was strongly penalized due to its substantially higher complexity.
Keywords
Artificial neural network, Calibration curve, Chemometrics, Ethanol electrooxidation, Matrix effects, Polynomial regression
Suggested Citation
Boy OC, Caprio UD, Nogueira I, Leblebici ME. Addressing Matrix Effects Through A Physical Prior-Informed Calibration Model For Quantitative Analysis. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1205-1211 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.116000
Author Affiliations
Boy OC: Center for Industrial Process Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Agoralaan Building B, Diepenbeek, Belgium
Caprio UD: Center for Industrial Process Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Agoralaan Building B, Diepenbeek, Belgium
Nogueira I: Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gløshaugen, Trondheim, Norway
Leblebici ME: Center for Industrial Process Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Agoralaan Building B, Diepenbeek, Belgium
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1205
Last Page
1211
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1205-1211-331-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0355
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.116000
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
159
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0355
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Stuber M, Reemtsma T. Evaluation of three calibration methods to compensate matrix effects in environmental analysis with LC-ESI-MS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 378:910-916 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2442-8
  2. Cheng WL, Markus C, Lim CY, Tan RZ, Sethi SK, Loh TP, . Calibration practices in clinical mass spectrometry: review and recommendations. Ann Lab Med 43:5-18 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.5
  3. Moosavi SM, Ghassabian S. Linearity of calibration curves for analytical methods: a review of criteria for assessment of method reliability. Calibration and Validation of Analytical Methods - A Sampling of Current Approaches : (2018) https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72932
  4. Olivieri AC. Chemometrics and multivariate calibration. Introduction to Multivariate Calibration :1-26 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64144-2_1
  5. Veiga-del-Baño JM, Oliva J, Cámara MÁ, Andreo-Martínez P, Motas M. Matrix-matched calibration for the quantitative analysis of pesticides in pepper and wheat flour: selection of the best calibration model. Agriculture 14:1014 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071014
  6. Chen HY, Chen C. Evaluation of calibration equations by using regression analysis: an example of chemical analysis. Sensors 22:447 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020447
  7. Ferreira V, Herrero P, Zapata J, Escudero A. Coping with matrix effects in headspace solid phase microextraction gas chromatography using multivariate calibration strategies. Journal of Chromatography A 1407:30-41 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.06.058
  8. Campmajó G, Saez-Vigo R, Saurina J, Núñez O. High-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection fingerprinting combined with chemometrics for nut classification and the detection and quantitation of almond-based product adulterations. Food Control 114:107265 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107265
  9. Brusamarello CZ, , Di Domenico M, Da Silva C, de Castilhos F. A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK IN QUANTIFICATION OF SOYBEAN BIODIESEL. Rev.Mex.Ing.Quim. 19:123-132 (2019) https://doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/bio579
  10. Gholivand MB, Jalalvand AR, Goicoechea HC, Gargallo R, Skov T, Paimard G. Combination of electrochemistry with chemometrics to introduce an efficient analytical method for simultaneous quantification of five opium alkaloids in complex matrices. Talanta 131:26-37 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.07.053
  11. Cavanaugh JE, Neath AA. The akaike information criterion: background, derivation, properties, application, interpretation, and refinements. WIREs Computational Stats 11: (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1460
  12. Neath AA, Cavanaugh JE. The bayesian information criterion: background, derivation, and applications. WIREs Computational Stats 4:199-203 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.199
(0.1 seconds)

[0.1 s]