Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0354
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0354
Designing MgCl2-Based Ethanol Dehydration Systems: A Multi-Objective Approach with Open-Loop Controllability
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Ethanol derived from biomass is a promising renewable fuel; however, its long-term use as a gasoline additive is becoming increasingly uncertain due to the rise of electric vehicles and alternative propulsion technologies. This trend motivates the exploration of higher-value applications for ethanol, particularly in the food and pharmaceutical sectors, where product safety is critical. A key challenge in ethanol purification is breaking the ethanol-water azeotrope, as conventional entrainers such as ethylene glycol or glycerol can leave residual traces that limit ethanol's use in sensitive markets. Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) offers an effective alternative, enabling high-purity ethanol without introducing hazardous organic residues, while exhibiting favorable hygroscopic properties and operational reliability. Simulating this system is challenging due to strong non-ideal and electrolyte interactions in phase equilibrium. Conducting a rigorous controllability analysis is also difficult; therefore, within an Integrated Design and Control (IDC) framework, accurate approximations are essential for successful implementation. This work presents a multi-objective optimization of a MgCl2-based ethanol dehydration column, simultaneously minimizing the Total Annual Cost (TAC) and the open-loop controllability criterion (A? + ?sm). The optimization integrates Aspen Plus® with Python and employs validated surrogate cost models for the preconcentrator and salt concentrator processes. Dynamic boundaries ensure product purity by maintaining the ethanol/water feed below the salt feed. The ASF (Achievement Scalarizing Function) solution achieved a 64.33% improvement in controllability with a 13.37% increase in TAC relative to the reference case reported in the literature, illustrating the trade-off between economic and control objectives. This study demonstrates that incorporating simplified controllability metrics into multi-objective optimization enables the efficient and practical design of complex systems, providing a viable approach for managing cost-control trade-offs in processes with challenging dynamics.
Keywords
Aspen Plus - Python, Ethanol Dehydration, Magnesium Chloride, Multi-objective Optimization, Surrogate Models
Suggested Citation
Velázquez JJH, Avila JRA, Hernández S, Ruiz JC. Designing MgCl2-Based Ethanol Dehydration Systems: A Multi-Objective Approach with Open-Loop Controllability. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1197-1204 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.136125
Author Affiliations
Velázquez JJH: Universidad de Guanajuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Guanajuato, 36050, Mexico. Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Guanajuato, Departamento de Ingeniería en Industrias Alimentarias, Guanajuato, 36262, Mexico [ORCID]
Avila JRA: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Departamento de Ingeniería, Lima, 15074, Peru [ORCID]
Hernández S: Universidad de Guanajuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Guanajuato, 36050, Mexico [ORCID]
Ruiz JC: Universidad de Guanajuato, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Guanajuato, 36050, Mexico [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1197
Last Page
1204
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1197-1204-329-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0354
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.136125
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
174
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0354
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Giehl A, Klanovicz N, Camargo AF, Albarello MLR, Treichel H, Alves SL Jr. Ethanol and electricity: fueling or fooling the future of road passenger transport?. Energy Nexus 12:100258 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100258
  2. Curcio E. Accelerating Transportation Decarbonization: The Strategic Role of Ethanol Blends and Regulatory Incentives. arXiv (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.06278
  3. Susmozas A, Martín-Sampedro R, Ibarra D, Eugenio ME, Iglesias R, Manzanares P, Moreno AD. Process strategies for the transition of 1G to advanced bioethanol production. Processes 8:1310 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101310
  4. Aslanzadeh S, Ishola MM, Richards T, Taherzadeh MJ. An overview of existing individual unit operations. Biorefineries :3-36 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59498-3.00001-4
  5. Tavan Y, Hosseini SH. A novel integrated process to break the ethanol/water azeotrope using reactive distillation - part I: parametric study. Separation and Purification Technology 118:455-462 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.036
  6. Herrera Velázquez JJ, Cabrera Ruiz J, Alcántara Avila JR. Design of a Heterogeneous Azeotropic Distillation Processes Using Stochastic Optimization. Comp Aided Chem Eng 52:889-895 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15274-0.50142-6
  7. García-Herreros P, Gómez JM, Gil ID, Rodríguez G. Optimization of the design and operation of an extractive distillation system for the production of fuel grade ethanol using glycerol as entrainer. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:3977-3985 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101845j
  8. Zeng L, Li Z. A new process for fuel ethanol dehydration based on modeling the phase equilibria of the anhydrous mgcl2 + ethanol + water system. AIChE Journal 61:664-676 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14685
  9. Llano-Restrepo M, Aguilar-Arias J. Modeling and simulation of saline extractive distillation columns for the production of absolute ethanol. Computers & Chemical Engineering 27:527-549 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-1354(02)00215-6
  10. Herrera-Velázquez JJ, Cabrera-Ruiz J, Alcántara-Avila JR, Hernández-Hernández EJ, Perez-Gudiño MA, Luna-Perez R, Hernández S. Optimization of the bioethanol dehydration process using mgcl2 as mass separating agent. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 201:109809 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2024.109809
  11. Alcántara-Avila JR, Cabrera-Ruiz J, Lee HY. Open-loop analysis for the stability of reactive distillation columns with intermediate condensers for the production of silane. IFAC-PapersOnLine 55:632-637 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.514
  12. Vega P, Lamanna R, Revollar S, Francisco M. Integrated design and control of chemical processes - part II: an illustrative example. Computers & Chemical Engineering 71:618-635 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.09.019
  13. Cabrera-Ruiz J, Ramírez-Márquez C, Hasebe S, Hernández S, Alcántara Avila JR. Outlook of the dynamic behavior of closed-loop control through open-loop analysis for intensified separation processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57:16795-16808 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04164
  14. Skogestad S, Morari M. The dominant time constant for distillation columns. Computers & Chemical Engineering 11:607-617 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(87)87006-0
  15. Velázquez JJH, Avila JRA, Hernandez S, Ruiz JC. Evaluation of the controllability of distillation with multiple reactive stages. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1095-1100 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.120398
  16. Vane LM, Alvarez FR, Rosenblum L, Govindaswamy S. Efficient ethanol recovery from yeast fermentation broth with integrated distillation-membrane process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:1033-1041 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2024917
  17. Tse TJ, Wiens DJ, Reaney MJT. Production of bioethanol-a review of factors affecting ethanol yield. Fermentation 7:268 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040268
  18. Blank J, Deb K. Pymoo: multi-objective optimization in python. IEEE Access 8:89497-89509 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2990567
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]