LAPSE:2026.0351
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0351
A Symbolic Regression-based approach for Modeling Fouling Resistance in Heat Exchangers
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Heat exchangers frequently suffer from fouling, which is the accumulation of unwanted deposits on heat-transfer surfaces. This issue reduces thermal performance, increases pressure drop, and raises energy use and operating costs. Predicting fouling resistance remains challenging in process engineering, yet it is important for monitoring, maintenance planning, and mitigation actions that reduce economic losses and environmental impacts. Symbolic regression (SR) is a machine learning approach that searches for an explicit mathematical expression that best represents the relationship between process inputs and a target output. Unlike many black-box models, SR can capture nonlinear behavior while producing compact, interpretable equations that are easier to deploy and analyze in industrial settings. In this work, a methodology to rapidly obtain algebraic models for fouling resistance in industrial heat exchangers using SR was proposed. Plant measurements of hot- and cold-side flow rates and inlet/outlet temperatures were transformed into dimensionless numbers, which were used as model inputs to predict fouling resistance. SR was applied to operational data from industrial heat exchangers, achieving coefficients of determination (R²) above 0.95 and 0.87 for the training and validation datasets, respectively, with low prediction errors. A selected equation was then transferred to a second industrial heat exchanger by re-estimating a reduced set of parameters using plant data. Validation on data not used during parameter estimation showed that the adapted model maintained high predictive accuracy, with R² values of 0.96 and 0.91 for training and validation, respectively. Overall, the proposed approach provided an efficient and interpretable framework for fouling resistance modeling and supported practical deployment across similar units.
Heat exchangers frequently suffer from fouling, which is the accumulation of unwanted deposits on heat-transfer surfaces. This issue reduces thermal performance, increases pressure drop, and raises energy use and operating costs. Predicting fouling resistance remains challenging in process engineering, yet it is important for monitoring, maintenance planning, and mitigation actions that reduce economic losses and environmental impacts. Symbolic regression (SR) is a machine learning approach that searches for an explicit mathematical expression that best represents the relationship between process inputs and a target output. Unlike many black-box models, SR can capture nonlinear behavior while producing compact, interpretable equations that are easier to deploy and analyze in industrial settings. In this work, a methodology to rapidly obtain algebraic models for fouling resistance in industrial heat exchangers using SR was proposed. Plant measurements of hot- and cold-side flow rates and inlet/outlet temperatures were transformed into dimensionless numbers, which were used as model inputs to predict fouling resistance. SR was applied to operational data from industrial heat exchangers, achieving coefficients of determination (R²) above 0.95 and 0.87 for the training and validation datasets, respectively, with low prediction errors. A selected equation was then transferred to a second industrial heat exchanger by re-estimating a reduced set of parameters using plant data. Validation on data not used during parameter estimation showed that the adapted model maintained high predictive accuracy, with R² values of 0.96 and 0.91 for training and validation, respectively. Overall, the proposed approach provided an efficient and interpretable framework for fouling resistance modeling and supported practical deployment across similar units.
Record ID
Keywords
Fouling resistance, Heat exchangers, Industrial process modeling, Interpretable machine learning, Symbolic regression
Subject
Suggested Citation
Lima FARD, Campos AB, Assis BCGD, Costa LPL, Liporace FS, Souza MBD Jr, Secchi AR. A Symbolic Regression-based approach for Modeling Fouling Resistance in Heat Exchangers. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1175-1182 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.176500
Author Affiliations
Lima FARD: Chemical Engineering Program, PEQ/COPPE - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, 2030, CT, Bloco G, G115, 21941-914, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil. EPQB, School of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, [ORCID]
Campos AB: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil [ORCID]
Assis BCGD: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Costa LPL: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Liporace FS: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Souza MBD Jr: Chemical Engineering Program, PEQ/COPPE - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, 2030, CT, Bloco G, G115, 21941-914, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil. EPQB, School of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, [ORCID]
Secchi AR: Chemical Engineering Program, PEQ/COPPE - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, 2030, CT, Bloco G, G115, 21941-914, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil. EPQB, School of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, [ORCID]
Campos AB: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil [ORCID]
Assis BCGD: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Costa LPL: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Liporace FS: CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Souza MBD Jr: Chemical Engineering Program, PEQ/COPPE - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, 2030, CT, Bloco G, G115, 21941-914, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil. EPQB, School of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, [ORCID]
Secchi AR: Chemical Engineering Program, PEQ/COPPE - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, 2030, CT, Bloco G, G115, 21941-914, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil. EPQB, School of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Horácio Macedo, [ORCID]
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1175
Last Page
1182
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1175-1182-292-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0351
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.176500
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
145
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0351
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Müller-Steinhagen H, Malayeri MR, Watkinson AP. Heat exchanger fouling: mitigation and cleaning strategies. Heat Transf Eng. 32(3-4):189-196 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2010.505127
- Coletti F, Macchietto S. A dynamic, distributed model of shell-and-tube heat exchangers undergoing crude oil fouling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:4515-4533 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie901991g
- Diaz?Bejarano E, Coletti F, Macchietto S. A new dynamic model of crude oil fouling deposits and its application to the simulation of fouling?cleaning cycles. AIChE Journal 62:90-107 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15036
- Nebot E, Casanueva JF, Casanueva T, Sales D. Model for fouling deposition on power plant steam condensers cooled with seawater: effect of water velocity and tube material. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 50:3351-3358 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.022
- Mayer M, Bucko J, Benzinger W, Dittmeyer R, Augustin W, Scholl S. Modeling fouling factors for microscale heat exchangers. Experimental Heat Transfer 28:222-243 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1080/08916152.2013.854284
- Palmer KA, Hale WT, Such KD, Shea BR, Bollas GM. Optimal design of tests for heat exchanger fouling identification. Applied Thermal Engineering 95:382-393 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.11.043
- Qureshi BA, Zubair SM. Predicting the impact of heat exchanger fouling in power systems. Energy 107:595-602 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.032
- Yang J. Computational fluid dynamics studies on the induction period of crude oil fouling in a heat exchanger tube. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 159:120129 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120129
- Berce J, Zupan?i? M, Može M, Golobi? I. A review of crystallization fouling in heat exchangers. Processes 9:1356 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081356
- Rehman OU, Ramasamy MG, Rozali NEM, Mahadzir S, Ghumman ASM, Qureshi AH. Modeling strategies for crude oil-induced fouling in heat exchangers: a review. Processes 11:1036 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11041036
- McBride K, Sundmacher K. Overview of surrogate modeling in chemical process engineering. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 91:228-239 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800091
- Özdemir P, Yildirim R. The use of artificial intelligence for optimization and control of chemical processes: A review. ChemBioEng Rev. 12(4):e70012 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.70012
- Lima FARD, de Moraes MGF, Barreto AG Jr, Secchi AR, Grover MA, de Souza MB Jr. Applications of machine learning for modeling and advanced control of crystallization processes: developments and perspectives. Digital Chemical Engineering 14:100208 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2024.100208
- Sundar S, Rajagopal MC, Zhao H, Kuntumalla G, Meng Y, Chang HC, Shao C, Ferreira P, Miljkovic N, Sinha S, Salapaka S. Fouling modeling and prediction approach for heat exchangers using deep learning. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 159:120112 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120112
- Davoudi E, Vaferi B. Applying artificial neural networks for systematic estimation of degree of fouling in heat exchangers. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 130:138-153 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.12.017
- Wang Y, Wagner N, Rondinelli JM. Symbolic regression in materials science. MRS Communications 9:793-805 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2019.85
- Lima FARD, de Moraes MGF, Rebello CM, Barreto AG Jr, Secchi AR, de Souza MB Jr, Nogueira IBR. Interpretable and uncertainty-aware machine learning for trustworthy prediction in batch crystallization. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 215:110350 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2025.110350
- Neumann P, Cao L, Russo D, Vassiliadis VS, Lapkin AA. A new formulation for symbolic regression to identify physico-chemical laws from experimental data. Chemical Engineering Journal 387:123412 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123412
- Rebello CM, Costa EA, Fontana M, Schnitman L, Nogueira IBR. Interpretable scientific machine learning approach for correcting phenomenological models: methodology validation on an ESP prototype. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 63:19030-19050 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02104
- Santana VV, Costa E, Rebello CM, Ribeiro AM, Rackauckas C, Nogueira IBR. Efficient hybrid modeling and sorption model discovery for non-linear advection-diffusion-sorption systems: a systematic scientific machine learning approach. Chemical Engineering Science 282:119223 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.119223
- Liporace FS, De Oliveira SG. Real time fouling diagnosis and heat exchanger performance. Heat Transfer Engineering 28:193-201 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630601064595
- Cranmer M. Interpretable machine learning for science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl. arXiv arXiv:2305.01582 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01582
- Blank J, Deb K. Pymoo: multi-objective optimization in python. IEEE Access 8:89497-89509 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2990567
(0.08 seconds)
[0.09 s]

