Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0347
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0347
A Neural Model of Pinch-Based Multicomponent Distillation for Applications in Flowsheet Synthesis
June 12, 2026
Abstract
This work presents a data-driven surrogate modeling framework for predicting distillation behavior assuming an infinite number of stages and distillation limits informed by residue-curve topology and pinch-point feasibility analysis. The framework provides a direct mapping from feed composition and distillate-to-feed ratio (D/F) to distillate and bottom product compositions, making it suitable for flowsheet synthesis and optimization applications. The approach combines three components: a classifier that identifies feasible singular-point splits, a boundary regression model that predicts D/F limits separating pure- and mixed-product operating regimes, and a neural network that interpolates product compositions in the intermediate regime. The method is demonstrated for the ternary system ethanol, benzene, and water at 1 atm using data generated from rigorous vapor-liquid-liquid equilibrium analysis. Results show that the framework provides reliable predictions for pure splits while retaining smooth interpolation behavior in the mixed regime.
Keywords
Suggested Citation
Wolf AB, Skiborowski M, Burger J. A Neural Model of Pinch-Based Multicomponent Distillation for Applications in Flowsheet Synthesis. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1145-1152 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.174345
Author Affiliations
Wolf AB: Technical University of Munich, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Laboratory of Chemical Process Engineering, Straubing, Germany [ORCID]
Skiborowski M: Hamburg University of Technology, Institute of Process Systems Engineering, Hamburg, Germany [ORCID]
Burger J: Technical University of Munich, TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Laboratory of Chemical Process Engineering, Straubing, Germany [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1145
Last Page
1152
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1145-1152-269-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0347
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.174345
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
171
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0347
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Bausa J, Watzdorf RV, Marquardt W. Shortcut methods for nonideal multicomponent distillation: I. simple columns. AIChE Journal 44:2181-2198 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690441008
  2. Sasi T, Skiborowski M. Automatic synthesis of distillation processes for the separation of homogeneous azeotropic multicomponent systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59:20816-20835 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04555
  3. Göttl Q, Pirnay J, Burger J, Grimm DG. Deep reinforcement learning enables conceptual design of processes for separating azeotropic mixtures without prior knowledge. Computers & Chemical Engineering 194:108975 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108975
  4. Ryll O, Blagov S, Hasse H. ?/?-analysis of homogeneous distillation processes. Chemical Engineering Science 84:315-332 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.08.018
  5. Bekiaris N, Morari M. Multiple steady states in distillation: ?/? predictions, extensions, and implications for design, synthesis, and simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35:4264-4280 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie950450d
  6. O. Ryll, Thermodynamische Analyse gekoppelter Reaktions-Destillations-Prozesse: konzeptioneller Entwurf, Modellierung, Simulation und experimentelle Validierung, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stuttgart 2009.
  7. Gutiérrez-Antonio C. Multiobjective stochastic optimization of dividing-wall distillation columns using a surrogate model based on neural networks. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 29:491-504 (2016) https://doi.org/10.15255/cabeq.2014.2132
  8. Ibrahim D, Jobson M, Li J, Guillén-Gosálbez G. Optimization-based design of crude oil distillation units using surrogate column models and a support vector machine. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 134:212-225 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.03.006
  9. Wang Z, Zhou T, Sundmacher K. Data?driven integrated design of solvents and extractive distillation processes. AIChE Journal 69: (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18236
  10. Quirante N, Javaloyes J, Caballero JA. Rigorous design of distillation columns using surrogate models based on kriging interpolation. AIChE Journal 61:2169-2187 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14798
  11. Keßler T, Kunde C, McBride K, Mertens N, Michaels D, Sundmacher K, Kienle A. Global optimization of distillation columns using explicit and implicit surrogate models. Chemical Engineering Science 197:235-245 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.12.002
  12. Panofen M, Rolland T, Pela J, Skiborowski M. Surrogate models for distillation boundaries in azeotropic multicomponent mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 63:13723-13739 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00475
  13. Prausnitz, J., Lichtenthaler, R., Azevedo, E. Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria, Prentice Hall PTR (1999).
  14. Aspen Plus 8.8, Aspen Technology Inc.
(0.09 seconds)

[0.09 s]