Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0346
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0346
Comparison of Various Hydrogen Flux Trajectories in a Catalytic Membrane Reactor Operating Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene to Styrene
Nabeel S. Abo-Ghander
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Styrene is mainly produced by dehydrogenating ethylbenzene over an iron oxide-based catalyst. The reaction is endothermic and thermodynamically limited when operated in conventional catalytic fixed-bed reactors. This makes the styrene production process a conversion-selectivity trade-off, where different objectives must be compromised. In this work, a one-dimensional reactor model accounting for changes in molar flowrate, temperature, and pressure is used to predict the performance of a membrane reactor. Three main hydrogen flux profiles were assumed along the reactor axial direction: constant, linearly increasing, and linearly decreasing. It is found that the styrene yield and selectivity in a membrane reactor operated with a linearly decreasing hydrogen flux profile are higher than those with constant or linearly increasing hydrogen flux profiles in both isothermal and nonisothermal cases. It is also observed that the styrene yield and selectivity of the membrane reactor operated with a linearly decreasing hydrogen flux can be enhanced by improving the membrane's average hydrogen permeability. The influence of nonlinearity in the hydrogen flux equation is marginal and observed mainly at the reactor inlet. The improvement is due to enhanced hydrogen permeation, which is observed to be better for the linearly decreasing hydrogen profile than for the constant, linearly increasing hydrogen flux profile. When a permeation section is included in the reactor at the point where maximum hydrogen production is observed, the styrene yield is better than that of the completely permeated catalytic reactor.
Keywords
Hydrogen, Hydrogen Flux, Membranes, Modelling and Simulations, Optimization, Reaction Engineering
Suggested Citation
Abo-Ghander NS. Comparison of Various Hydrogen Flux Trajectories in a Catalytic Membrane Reactor Operating Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene to Styrene. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1135-1144 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.161713
Author Affiliations
Abo-Ghander NS: Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.. Interdisciplinary Center for Refining & Advanced Chemicals, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1135
Last Page
1144
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1135-1144-268-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0346
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.161713
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
159
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0346
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Mimura N, Saito M. Dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene over fe2o3/al2o3 catalysts in the presence of carbon dioxide. Catalysis Today 55:173-178 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5861(99)00236-9
  2. Zhu XM, Schön M, Bartmann U, van Veen AC, Muhler M. The dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene over a potassium-promoted iron oxide-based catalyst: a transient kinetic study. Applied Catalysis A: General 266:99-108 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.02.002
  3. Rossetti I, Bencini E, Trentini L, Forni L. Study of the deactivation of a commercial catalyst for ethylbenzene dehydrogenation to styrene. Applied Catalysis A: General 292:118-123 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.05.046
  4. Jae Lee W, Froment GF. Ethylbenzene dehydrogenation into styrene: kinetic modeling and reactor simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47:9183-9194 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie071098u
  5. Hossain MM, Atanda L, Al-Yassir N, Al-Khattaf S. Kinetics modeling of ethylbenzene dehydrogenation to styrene over a mesoporous alumina supported iron catalyst. Chemical Engineering Journal 207-208:308-321 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.108
  6. Hermann C, Quicker P, Dittmeyer R. Mathematical simulation of catalytic dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene in a composite palladium membrane reactor. Journal of Membrane Science 136:161-172 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388(97)81990-4
  7. Abo-Ghander NS, Grace JR, Elnashaie SSEH, Lim CJ. Modeling of a novel membrane reactor to integrate dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene with hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline. Chemical Engineering Science 63:1817-1826 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.12.007
  8. Abo-Ghander NS, Logist F, Grace JR, Van Impe JFM, Elnashaie SSEH, Lim CJ. Optimal design of an autothermal membrane reactor coupling the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene with the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline. Chemical Engineering Science 65:3113-3127 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.02.007
(0.08 seconds)

[0.08 s]