Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0328
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0328
Multi-objective simulation-based optimisation of pharmaceutical process systems
June 12, 2026
Abstract
The pharmaceutical industry is placing growing emphasis on sophisticated process modeling to enhance the efficiency of drug design and production pipelines. Optimal control over these models can significantly improve manufacturing performance by lowering costs, boosting productivity, and ensuring rigorous quality compliance. However, the intricate nature and heavy computational load of these models often require the adoption of more practical or simplified alternative strategies for optimisation such as simulation-based approaches. In this work, we introduce a simulation-based framework including a "top-level" gradient-based mathematical programming optimisation model coupled with a "low-level" simulation scheme, to optimise multi-scale drug substance manufacturing flowsheets. The proposed framework optimises critical quality attributes, such as yield and purity, including green metrics such as process mass intensity, aligning with digital platforms (e.g. gPROMS) used in the pharmaceutical industry. By constructing Pareto fronts, we capture the balance between conflicting objectives, providing valuable insight for informed decision-making. The results indicate that this simulation-based approach can effectively optimise complex process behaviors while improving computational efficiency as no preliminary data is needed. By applying the framework to a real-world case study, we demonstrate its potential in optimising complex pharmaceutical manufacturing flowsheets.
Keywords
Suggested Citation
Tsochatzidi A, Cenci F, Aroniada M, Papageorgiou LG. Multi-objective simulation-based optimisation of pharmaceutical process systems. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1001-1006 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.188431
Author Affiliations
Tsochatzidi A: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, UCL (University College London), Torrington Place, London, UK [ORCID]
Cenci F: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Research and Development, Park Road, Ware, UK [ORCID]
Aroniada M: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Research and Development, Park Road, Ware, UK [ORCID]
Papageorgiou LG: The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, UCL (University College London), Torrington Place, London, UK [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1001
Last Page
1006
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1001-1006-140-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0328
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.188431
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
144
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0328
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Amaran S, Sahinidis NV, Sharda B, Bury SJ. Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications. Ann Oper Res 240:351-380 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2019-x
  2. Boukouvala F, Ierapetritou MG. Surrogate-based optimization of expensive flowsheet modeling for continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing. J Pharm Innov 8:131-145 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-013-9154-1
  3. Christodoulou C, Sorensen E, García-Muñoz S, Mazzei L. Mathematical modelling of water absorption and evaporation in a pharmaceutical tablet during film coating. Chemical Engineering Science 175:40-55 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.09.021
  4. Diab S, Christodoulou C, Taylor G, Rushworth P. Mathematical modeling and optimization to inform impurity control in an industrial active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturing process. Org. Process Res. Dev. 26:2864-2881 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00208
  5. Gjerdrum, J., Samsatli, N.J., Shah, N., Papageorgiou, L. G. Optimisation of policy parameters in supply chain applications. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 8:15-36 (2005)
  6. Jimenez-Gonzalez C, Ponder CS, Broxterman QB, Manley JB. Using the right green yardstick: why process mass intensity is used in the pharmaceutical industry to drive more sustainable processes. Org. Process Res. Dev. 15:912-917 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1021/op200097d
  7. Laky DJ, Casas-Orozco D, Laird CD, Reklaitis GV, Nagy ZK. Simulation-optimization framework for the digital design of pharmaceutical processes using pyomo and pharmapy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. : (2022) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01636
  8. Tsochatzidi A, Cenci F, Aroniada M, Papageorgiou LG. A novel surrogate-based optimisation framework for pharmaceutical process systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 682:125861 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125861
  9. Tsochatzidi A, Liapis GI, Cenci F, Aroniada M, Papageorgiou LG. Surrogate-based multi-objective optimisation via tree regression. Computers & Chemical Engineering 207:109538 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109538
(0.1 seconds)

[0.11 s]