LAPSE:2026.0320
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0320
Analysis and comparison of technologies for the regeneration of a capture solution in DAC absorption systems
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Direct air capture is gaining significant interest due to its potential to achieve carbon-negative emissions. With the aim to reduce the energy consumption and in line with the electrification of chemical processes, the absorption direct air capture system is integrated into a bipolar membrane electrodialysis cell stack for solvent regeneration and carbon dioxide release. The scheme solution is characterized by carbon dioxide bubbles inside the cell reducing efficiency so that other regeneration schemes have been proposed in the literature. A direct comparison of those is missing in the existing state of the art: the present work wants to fill this gap. In addition to the above process, the reaction of the rich solution with a weak organic acid and the use of both nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes are considered in other process schemes. The three case studies are modelled in Aspen Plus software with the aim to compare the energy consumption and total cost while the environmental impact is evaluated with the life cycle assessment methodology. Results show that the best capture process from economic and environmental point of views is that using only a bipolar membrane electrodialysis for solvent regeneration and carbon dioxide release despite a higher energy consumption for the cell stack. Here total capture cost and environmental impact are respectively 480 $/tonCO2 and -0.9593 kgCO2eq/kgCO2 while the energy requirement in the BPMED stack is 408 kJ/molCO2.
Direct air capture is gaining significant interest due to its potential to achieve carbon-negative emissions. With the aim to reduce the energy consumption and in line with the electrification of chemical processes, the absorption direct air capture system is integrated into a bipolar membrane electrodialysis cell stack for solvent regeneration and carbon dioxide release. The scheme solution is characterized by carbon dioxide bubbles inside the cell reducing efficiency so that other regeneration schemes have been proposed in the literature. A direct comparison of those is missing in the existing state of the art: the present work wants to fill this gap. In addition to the above process, the reaction of the rich solution with a weak organic acid and the use of both nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes are considered in other process schemes. The three case studies are modelled in Aspen Plus software with the aim to compare the energy consumption and total cost while the environmental impact is evaluated with the life cycle assessment methodology. Results show that the best capture process from economic and environmental point of views is that using only a bipolar membrane electrodialysis for solvent regeneration and carbon dioxide release despite a higher energy consumption for the cell stack. Here total capture cost and environmental impact are respectively 480 $/tonCO2 and -0.9593 kgCO2eq/kgCO2 while the energy requirement in the BPMED stack is 408 kJ/molCO2.
Record ID
Keywords
Aspen Plus, Carbon Dioxide Capture, Life Cycle Analysis, Modelling and Simulations, OpenLCA, Technoeconomic Analysis
Subject
Suggested Citation
Leonzio G, Shah N. Analysis and comparison of technologies for the regeneration of a capture solution in DAC absorption systems. Systems and Control Transactions 5:943-949 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.164149
Author Affiliations
Leonzio G: University of Cagliari, Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, Cagliari, Italy
Shah N: Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Shah N: Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
943
Last Page
949
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0943-0949-80-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0320
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.164149
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
186
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0320
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Leonzio G, Fennell PS, Shah N. Analysis of technologies for carbon dioxide capture from the air. Applied Sciences 12:8321 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168321
- Sanz-Pérez ES, Murdock CR, Didas SA, Jones CW. Direct capture of co2 from ambient air. Chem. Rev. 116:11840-11876 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173
- Bouaboula H, Chaouki J, Belmabkhout Y, Zaabout A. Comparative review of direct air capture technologies: from technical, commercial, economic, and environmental aspects. Chemical Engineering Journal 484:149411 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149411
- Leonzio G, Shah N. Sustainability analysis of electrochemical direct air capture technologies. RSC Sustainability 3:4632-4650 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1039/d5su00227c
- Sabatino F, Mehta M, Grimm A, Gazzani M, Gallucci F, Kramer GJ, van Sint Annaland M. Evaluation of a direct air capture process combining wet scrubbing and bipolar membrane electrodialysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59:7007-7020 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05641
- Sabatino F, Mehta M, Grimm A, Gazzani M, Gallucci F, Kramer GJ, van Sint Annaland M. Evaluation of a direct air capture process combining wet scrubbing and bipolar membrane electrodialysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59:7007-7020 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05641
- Sabatino F, Gazzani M, Gallucci F, van Sint Annaland M. Modeling, optimization, and techno-economic analysis of bipolar membrane electrodialysis for direct air capture processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61:12668-12679 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00889
- Young J, McQueen N, Charalambous C, Foteinis S, Hawrot O, Ojeda M, Pilorgé H, Andresen J, Psarras P, Renforth P, Garcia S, van der Spek M. The cost of direct air capture and storage can be reduced via strategic deployment but is unlikely to fall below stated cost targets. One Earth 6:899-917 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.06.004
- Leonzio G, Thill A, Shah N. A global sensitivity analysis for a bipolar membrane electrodialysis capturing carbon dioxide from the air. Systems and Control Transactions 4:456-461 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.160159
- Nagasawa H, Yamasaki A, Iizuka A, Kumagai K, Yanagisawa Y. A new recovery process of carbon dioxide from alkaline carbonate solution via electrodialysis. AIChE Journal 55:3286-3293 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11907
- Leonzio, G., Xing, L., Shah, N., Analysis of new strategies integrating bipolar membrane electrodialysis and absorption systems in DAC applications. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, under review.
- Kemp, K.W., Ostericher, A.L., Olmstead, D.E., 2022. Systems and methods for capturing carbon dioxide and regenerating a capture solution, US 2022/0362707 A1
- Keith DW, Holmes G, St Angelo D, Heidel K. A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere. Joule 2:1573-1594 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006
- Rouxhet A, Kim SM, Leonard G. Study of direct air capture (DAC) using a KOH/K2CO3 absorbing solution for CO2 capture. SSRN Journal : (2022) https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4273837
- Maeda Y. Fouling of reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes by low molecular weight organic compounds (lmwocs), part 1: fundamentals and mechanism. Membranes 14:221 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14100221
- Ma Q, Lei Q, Liu F, Song Z, Khusid B, Zhang W. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per?and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices. Water Environment Research 96: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10983
- Virruso G, Cassaro C, Culcasi A, Cipollina A, Tamburini A, Bogle IDL, Micale GDM. Multi-scale modelling of an electrodialysis with bipolar membranes pilot plant and economic evaluation of its potential. Desalination 583:117724 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117724
- Ankoliya D, Mudgal A, Sinha MK, Davies P, Park K, Alegre RR, Patel V, Patel J. Techno-economic analysis of integrated bipolar membrane electrodialysis and batch reverse osmosis for water and chemical recovery from dairy wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production 420:138264 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138264
- https://www.bigbrandwater.com/nf90-2540.html?utm_source=copilot.com
- https://www.acquahome.it/en/03-vessel-e-membrane/membrane-filmtec/filmtec-bw30-2540-reverse-osmosis-membrane.2.10.35.gp.1587.uw?utm_source=copilot.com
- Spallina V, Pandolfo D, Battistella A, Romano MC, Van Sint Annaland M, Gallucci F. Techno-economic assessment of membrane assisted fluidized bed reactors for pure h 2 production with CO 2 capture. Energy Conversion and Management 120:257-273 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.073
- Intratec, 2025 available at: https://www.intratec.us/solutions/primary-commodity-prices/commodity/potassium-hydroxide-prices?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- Cuevas-Castillo GA, Michailos S, Hughes K, Ingham D, Navarro-Pineda F, Pourkashanian M. Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of power-to-formic acid production using direct air capture and green hydrogen. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 26:100929 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.100929
- Regis F, Demichelis F, Monteverde A, Fino D. Techno-economic-environmental analysis of CO2 fermentation to acetic acid. Chemical Engineering Journal 520:166138 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.166138
- OurWorldInData, 2025, available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/levelized-cost-of-energy?country=~GBR
- ISO 14040, 2009. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels.
- ISO 14044, 2006. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels
- Eke V, Sahu T, Ghuman KK, Freire-Gormaly M, O'Brien PG. A comprehensive review of life cycle assessments of direct air capture and carbon dioxide storage. Sustainable Production and Consumption 55:217-241 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.017
- Handojo L, Wardani AK, Regina D, Bella C, Kresnowati MTAP, Wenten IG. Electro-membrane processes for organic acid recovery. RSC Adv. 9:7854-7869 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra09227c
- Wang Y, Zhang N, Huang C, Xu T. Production of monoprotic, diprotic, and triprotic organic acids by using electrodialysis with bipolar membranes: effect of cell configurations. Journal of Membrane Science 385-386:226-233 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.044
- Eisaman MD, Alvarado L, Larner D, Wang P, Littau KA. CO2 desorption using high-pressure bipolar membrane electrodialysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 4:4031 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01336j
- Vallejo-Castaño S, Bianchi G, Shu Q, Mathiasin E, Saakes M, Hamelers HVM, Kuntke P. Efficiency and energy consumption analysis of bipolar membrane electrodialysis for electrochemical CO 2 capture. J. Mater. Chem. A 13:37544-37557 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ta04909a
- Shu Q, Sin CS, Tedesco M, Hamelers HVM, Kuntke P. Optimization of an electrochemical direct air capture process with decreased CO2 desorption pressure and addition of background electrolyte. Chemical Engineering Journal 470:144251 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144251
- Iizuka A, Hashimoto K, Nagasawa H, Kumagai K, Yanagisawa Y, Yamasaki A. Carbon dioxide recovery from carbonate solutions using bipolar membrane electrodialysis. Separation and Purification Technology 101:49-59 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.016
(0.1 seconds)
[0.1 s]

