Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0282
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0282
Capturing mixing effects on aggregation kinetics of monoclonal antibodies during viral inactivation
T. Marella, F. Cenci, P. Thompson, M. Muhieddine, F. Bezzo
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Mathematical models play a central role in biopharmaceutical manufacturing, especially within the Quality by Design framework. For these models to be effectively used in optimization tasks, they must be both reliable and capable of delivering results in an affordable computational time. This work proposes a strategy to model aggregate formation during viral inactivation in the context of monoclonal antibody downstream processing. These units often display mixing-sensitive behavior because aggregation kinetics is controlled by local pH, whose spatial heterogeneities arise from titrant addition at a defined feed point. To address this challenge, compartment models (CMs) are employed. This modeling approach captures spatial inhomogeneities within the unit by leveraging flow-exchange information derived from a single steady-state Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation involving only the solution of mass, momentum and turbulence equations. Results obtained by comparing compartment models with both perfectly mixed models and full CFD simulations including aggregation kinetics demonstrate that CMs can reproduce the CFD results with good approximation, while reducing computational time by orders of magnitude.
Keywords
Compartment Models, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Downstream Bioprocessing, Monoclonal Antibodies
Suggested Citation
Marella T, Cenci F, Thompson P, Muhieddine M, Bezzo F. Capturing mixing effects on aggregation kinetics of monoclonal antibodies during viral inactivation. Systems and Control Transactions 5:640-647 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.138025
Author Affiliations
Marella T: CAPE-Lab - Computer-Aided Process Engineering Laboratory. Department of Industrial Engineering. University of Padova, Padova, Italy. [ORCID]
Cenci F: GSK Ware Research and Development, Ware, UK. [ORCID]
Thompson P: GSK R&D, Biopharmaceutical Drug Substance Development (BDSD), King of Prussia, USA.
Muhieddine M: GSK Ware Research and Development, Ware, UK.
Bezzo F: CAPE-Lab - Computer-Aided Process Engineering Laboratory. Department of Industrial Engineering. University of Padova, Padova, Italy. [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
640
Last Page
647
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0640-0647-137-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0282
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.138025
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
218
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0282
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Destro F, Barolo M. A review on the modernization of pharmaceutical development and manufacturing - trends, perspectives, and the role of mathematical modeling. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 620:121715 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121715
  2. Jaworski Z, Zakrzewska B. Towards multiscale modelling in product engineering. Computers & Chemical Engineering 35:434-445 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.05.009
  3. Arosio P, Barolo G, Müller-Späth T, Wu H, Morbidelli M. Aggregation stability of a monoclonal antibody during downstream processing. Pharm Res 28:1884-1894 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0416-7
  4. Le Nepvou De Carfort J, Pinto T, Krühne U. An automatic method for generation of cfd-based 3D compartment models: towards real-time mixing simulations. Bioengineering 11:169 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11020169
  5. Jourdan N, Neveux T, Potier O, Kanniche M, Wicks J, Nopens I, Rehman U, Le Moullec Y. Compartmental modelling in chemical engineering: a critical review. Chemical Engineering Science 210:115196 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.115196
  6. Bezzo F, Macchietto S, Pantelides CC. A general methodology for hybrid multizonal/cfd models. Computers & Chemical Engineering 28:501-511 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.08.004
  7. Delafosse A, Collignon ML, Calvo S, Delvigne F, Crine M, Thonart P, Toye D. Cfd-based compartment model for description of mixing in bioreactors. Chemical Engineering Science 106:76-85 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.11.033
  8. Farzan P, Ierapetritou MG. A framework for the development of integrated and computationally feasible models of large-scale mammalian cell bioreactors. Processes 6:82 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6070082
  9. Maldonado de León H, Straathof A, Haringa C. Dynamic compartment models: towards a rapid modeling approach for fed-batch fermentations. Chemical Engineering Science 308:121396 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2025.121396
  10. Tajsoleiman T, Spann R, Bach C, Gernaey KV, Huusom JK, Krühne U. A CFD based automatic method for compartment model development. Computers & Chemical Engineering 123:236-245 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.12.015
  11. Laborda VPI, Puiman L, Groves T, Haringa C, Nielsen LK. Unsupervised learning bioreactor regimes. Computers & Chemical Engineering 194:108891 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108891
  12. Le Nepvou De Carfort J, Puig I Laborda V, Nielsen LK, Gernaey KV, Krühne U. Flow-informed clustering of bioreactor volumes to build cfd-based compartment models. Chemical Engineering Science 320:122539 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2025.122539
  13. Haringa C, Tang W, Noorman HJ. Stochastic parcel tracking in an euler-lagrange compartment model for fast simulation of fermentation processes. Biotech & Bioengineering 119:1849-1860 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28094
(0.1 seconds)

[0.11 s]