LAPSE:2026.0233
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0233
Integration of exergy and economic optimization for green hydrogen and power co-generation based on sorbent-enhanced biogas reforming with CO2 capture
June 12, 2026
Abstract
In the urgent effort to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the industrial sector, biogas-derived green hydrogen and power co-generation represents a promising solution. Biogas, a renewable and carbon-neutral resource, provides a flexible feedstock for decentralized energy systems, particularly in regions with well-developed agricultural or waste biomass infrastructure. This approach allows the deployment of cost-efficient systems aligned with climate targets and industrial decarbonization roadmaps. Compared to steam methane reforming (SMR), sorbent-enhanced SMR (SE-SMR) with integrated calcium looping (CaL) CO2 capture reduces process emissions while enhancing hydrogen yield. This study investigates the economic and exergy-based implications of partially splitting hydrogen from a SE-SMR-CaL system producing 50, 000 Nm³/h of H2 from desulfurized biogas. Following heat integration using the PINCH methodology, an electrically self-sufficient base case was established. Economic and exergy analyses were conducted in Excel, with cash flow allocation based on exergy contributions. An automated optimization routine identified competitive levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) and hydrogen (LCOH). Results show that increasing the hydrogen split to power generation maintains nearly constant LCOE (<1% variation) while reducing overall exergy efficiency. Partial hydrogen splitting achieves LCOE below 30.5 €/MWh at the expense of increased LCOH, highlighting a trade-off between electricity and hydrogen economics in flexible, multi-vector systems. The workflow demonstrates that incorporating electricity generation into a sorbent-enhanced hydrogen production system using air combustion is technically and economically feasible.
In the urgent effort to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the industrial sector, biogas-derived green hydrogen and power co-generation represents a promising solution. Biogas, a renewable and carbon-neutral resource, provides a flexible feedstock for decentralized energy systems, particularly in regions with well-developed agricultural or waste biomass infrastructure. This approach allows the deployment of cost-efficient systems aligned with climate targets and industrial decarbonization roadmaps. Compared to steam methane reforming (SMR), sorbent-enhanced SMR (SE-SMR) with integrated calcium looping (CaL) CO2 capture reduces process emissions while enhancing hydrogen yield. This study investigates the economic and exergy-based implications of partially splitting hydrogen from a SE-SMR-CaL system producing 50, 000 Nm³/h of H2 from desulfurized biogas. Following heat integration using the PINCH methodology, an electrically self-sufficient base case was established. Economic and exergy analyses were conducted in Excel, with cash flow allocation based on exergy contributions. An automated optimization routine identified competitive levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) and hydrogen (LCOH). Results show that increasing the hydrogen split to power generation maintains nearly constant LCOE (<1% variation) while reducing overall exergy efficiency. Partial hydrogen splitting achieves LCOE below 30.5 €/MWh at the expense of increased LCOH, highlighting a trade-off between electricity and hydrogen economics in flexible, multi-vector systems. The workflow demonstrates that incorporating electricity generation into a sorbent-enhanced hydrogen production system using air combustion is technically and economically feasible.
Record ID
Keywords
Exergy analysis, Green hydrogen and power, Modelling, simulation and optimization, Sorbent-enhanced biogas reforming, Techno-economic assessment
Subject
Suggested Citation
Báthori A, Cormos C. Integration of exergy and economic optimization for green hydrogen and power co-generation based on sorbent-enhanced biogas reforming with CO2 capture. Systems and Control Transactions 5:252-258 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.195497
Author Affiliations
Báthori A: Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chemical Engineering Department, 11 Arany Janos, Postal code: 400028, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Cormos C: Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chemical Engineering Department, 11 Arany Janos, Postal code: 400028, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Cormos C: Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chemical Engineering Department, 11 Arany Janos, Postal code: 400028, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
252
Last Page
258
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0252-0258-30-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0233
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.195497
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
207
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0233
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
- Davoodi S, Al-Shargabi M, Wood DA, Rukavishnikov VS, Minaev KM. Review of technological progress in carbon dioxide capture, storage, and utilization. Gas Science and Engineering 117:205070 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.205070
- Flores F, Feijoo F, DeStephano P, Herc L, Pfeifer A, Dui? N. Assessment of the impacts of renewable energy variability in long-term decarbonization strategies. Applied Energy 368:123464 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123464
- Masoudi Soltani S, Lahiri A, Bahzad H, Clough P, Gorbounov M, Yan Y. Sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming for combined CO2 capture and hydrogen production: a state-of-the-art review. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 1:100003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100003
- Arias B, Alvarez Criado Y, Méndez A, Marqués P, Finca I, Abanades JC. Pilot testing of calcium looping at TRL7 with co2 capture efficiencies toward 99%. Energy Fuels 38:14757-14764 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02472
- Fagerstro¨m Anton, Al Seadi Teodorita, Rasi Saija, Briseid Tormod. The role of anaerobic digestion and biogas in the circular economy. IEA Bioenergy 2019.
- Xu J, Froment GF. Methane steam reforming, methanation and water?gas shift: I. intrinsic kinetics. AIChE Journal 35:88-96 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690350109
- Johnsen K, Grace JR, Elnashaie SSEH, Kolbeinsen L, Eriksen D. Modeling of sorption-enhanced steam reforming in a dual fluidized bubbling bed reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45:4133-4144 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0511736
- Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. first edition, John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, USA (1995)
- Smith R. Chemical process design and integration. second edition, Wiley, Hoboken, USA (2016)
- Báthori AM, Cormos CC. Green hydrogen production by intensified biogas reforming via sorption-enhanced technology: an energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 155:150363 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150363
- Hyper - Bulk hydrogen production by sorbent enhanced steam reforming. https://hyperh2.co.uk/
- García-Lario AL, Aznar M, Martinez I, Grasa GS, Murillo R. Experimental study of the application of a nio/nial2o4 catalyst and a cao-based synthetic sorbent on the sorption enhanced reforming process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40:219-232 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.033
- Greco-Coppi M, Strohle J, Epple B. A carbonator model for CO2 capture based on results from pilot tests. Part II: deactivation and reaction model. Chem Eng J 508:159041 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.153
- Lai CS, McCulloch MD. Levelized cost of electricity for solar photovoltaic and electrical energy storage. Applied Energy 190:191-203 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.153
- Stehly T, Duffy P, Hernando DM, Cost of Wind Energy Review: 2024 Edition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2024
(0.11 seconds)
[0.11 s]

