LAPSE:2025.0538
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0538
Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison for Mixed Substrate Biomass Fermentation
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Most industrial fermentations in food and drink use a single, high purity sugar as a substrate. These pure substrates are more expensive and less sustainable than mixed substrates, that can be derived from agricultural byproducts such as straw. However, use of mixed substrates in fermentation leads to challenging modelling and parameter estimation problems, particularly when much academic research, intended to inform industrial applications, uses batch fermentations, while large-scale fermentation is usually continuous, thanks to its cost and productivity advantages. Our findings highlight key challenges in using batch-derived experimental data to inform models of the continuous fermentation processes used at industrial scale. Extrapolating from data obtained in batch to continuous fermentation is risky, as models with near-equivalent data-fit and predictions in a batch context give very different predictions for continuous culture. For continuous fermentations to switch to mixed substrates, we need to improve understanding of dual substrate growth in continuous fermentation, to allow for optimised process design and operation.
Most industrial fermentations in food and drink use a single, high purity sugar as a substrate. These pure substrates are more expensive and less sustainable than mixed substrates, that can be derived from agricultural byproducts such as straw. However, use of mixed substrates in fermentation leads to challenging modelling and parameter estimation problems, particularly when much academic research, intended to inform industrial applications, uses batch fermentations, while large-scale fermentation is usually continuous, thanks to its cost and productivity advantages. Our findings highlight key challenges in using batch-derived experimental data to inform models of the continuous fermentation processes used at industrial scale. Extrapolating from data obtained in batch to continuous fermentation is risky, as models with near-equivalent data-fit and predictions in a batch context give very different predictions for continuous culture. For continuous fermentations to switch to mixed substrates, we need to improve understanding of dual substrate growth in continuous fermentation, to allow for optimised process design and operation.
Record ID
Keywords
Biosystems, Continuous Fermentation, Design Under Uncertainty, Dual Substrate Growth, Fermentation, Food & Agricultural Processes, Lignocellulosic Hydrolysates, Modelling and Simulations
Suggested Citation
Vinestock T, Guo M. Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison for Mixed Substrate Biomass Fermentation. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2405-2410 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.162971
Author Affiliations
Vinestock T: Kings College London, Department of Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Guo M: Kings College London, Department of Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Guo M: Kings College London, Department of Engineering, London, United Kingdom
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2405
Last Page
2410
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2405-2410-1539-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0538
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.162971
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
416
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0538
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- Twine R. Emissions from Animal Agriculture-16.5% Is the New Minimum Figure. Sustainability (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116276
- Good Food Institute, Fermentation: State of the industry report. (2021)
- Nijdam D, Rood Tet al. The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002
- Carbon Trust. Quorn Footprint Comparison Report (2023)
- Li YP, Ahmadi F. Recent advances and challenges in single cell protein (SCP) technologies for food and feed production. npj Sci Food (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-024-00299-2
- Vlaeminck E, Uitterhaegen E et al. Single-cell protein production from industrial off-gas through acetate: techno-economic analysis for a coupled fermentation approach. Fermentation (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9080771
- Piercy E, Verstraete W et al. A sustainable waste-to-protein system to maximise waste resource utilisation for developing food- and feed-grade protein solutions. Green Chemistry (2023) https://doi.org/10.31224/2512
- Banks M, Taylor M, and Guo M. High throughput parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis applied to the production of mycoprotein from synthetic lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Curr. Res. Food Sci. (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100908
- Vega-Ramon F, Zhu X, et al. Kinetic and hybrid modeling for yeast astaxanthin production under uncertainty. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27950
- Olszewska-Widdrat A, Alexandri M, et al. Batch and continuous lactic acid fermentation based on a multi-substrate approach. Microorganisms (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8071084
- Ramkrishna D, Song HS. Dynamic models of metabolism: Review of the cybernetic approach. AIChE Journal (2012) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.13734
- Ritala A, Häkkinen ST et al. Single cell protein-state-of-the-art, industrial landscape and patents 2001-2016. Front. Microbiol. (2017) https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02009
- Virtanen P, Gommers R et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods (2020)
- Hindmarsh AC, Petzold, LR. LSODA, Ordinary Differential Equation Solver for Stiff or Non-Stiff System. OECD/NEA (2005)
- Liu DC, Nocedal J. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math. Program (1989) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589116
- Monod, J. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. (1949) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103
- Contois DE. Kinetics of bacterial growth: relationship between population density and specific growth rate of continuous cultures. J. Gen. Microbiol. (1959) https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-21-1-40
- Kompala DS, Ramkrishna D et al. Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: Experimental evaluation of cybernetic models. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (1986) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260280715
- Nakamura Y, Sawada T et al. Stability analysis of continuous culture in diauxic growth. J. Ferment. Bioeng. (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(96)85144-0
- Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E. Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: An overview. Biotechnol. Adv. (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.10.006
- Wang C, Lan CQ. Effects of shear stress on microalgae - A review. Biotechnol. Adv. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.001

