Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0490
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0490
Taking into account social aspects for the development of industrial ecology on a territory
Maud Verneuil, Sydney Thomas, Marianne Boix
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Industrial ecology appears to be a significant means of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from industry. However, beyond flow management, eco-industrial parks can also contribute to a socio-economic transition on a regional scale. Usually, multi-criteria optimization models use economic and environmental criteria in the decision-making process. This article looks at the integration of social criteria in these models, and more broadly at the issues involved in measuring the social impact of an eco-industrial park. The aim of this article is to take a different approach to social indicators, by highlighting the key success factors of an eco-industrial park, such as cooperation within a collective but also between the different scales making up the system. This work is based on bibliographical research and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in the field. What's more, the process of developing social indicators, particularly participatory ones, seems to be a strong catalyst in the construction of relationships and their dynamics. Finally, the metric of social indicators also has its limitations, which should be considered if we are to be able to address the various issues in a systemic way and potentially envisage other ways of taking into account the social aspect of an eco-industrial park.
Keywords
co-building, Eco-industrial park, relational dimension, social indicators
Suggested Citation
Verneuil M, Thomas S, Boix M. Taking into account social aspects for the development of industrial ecology on a territory. Systems and Control Transactions 4:2101-2107 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.124837
Author Affiliations
Verneuil M: Toulouse INP, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse, France
Thomas S: Toulouse INP, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse, France
Boix M: Toulouse INP, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, UMR 5503, 4 Allée Emile Monso, 31432 Toulouse, France
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
2101
Last Page
2107
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 2101-2107-1637-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0490
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.124837
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
423
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0490
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Boix, M., Montastruc, L., Azzaro-Pantel, C., & Domenech, S. (2015). Optimization methods applied to the design of eco-industrial parks : A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.032
  2. Thomas, S., Boix, M., & Negny, S. (2024). Stratégies de décarbonation pour l'écologie industrielle, 19ème Congrès SFGP 2024, Deauville, France
  3. Hale, J., Legun, K., Campbell, H., & Carolan, M. (2019). Social sustainability indicators as performance. Geoforum, 103, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008
  4. Diemer, A., & Rubio, M. E. M. (2016). L'écologie industrielle et territoriale peut-elle s'affirmer comme un véritable modèle de développement durable pour les pays du Sud ? Revue Francophone du Développement Durable, 1, 52-71
  5. Gobert, J., & Brullot, S. (2018). La mobilisation du capital territorial pour le développement d'une logique d'Écologie industrielle et territoriale: Revue d'Économie Régionale & Urbaine, Décembre(5), 881-904. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.175.0881
  6. Shek, D. T. L., & Wu, F. K. Y. (2018). The Social Indicators Movement : Progress, Paradigms, Puzzles, Promise and Potential Research Directions. Social Indicators Research, 135(3), 975-990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1552-1
  7. Faucheux, S., & Nicolaï, I. (2022). Indicateurs de Développement Durable dans les entreprises : Vers un contrat social? Encyclopédie du Développement durable, 4D, 2009. hal-01799295
  8. Brullot, S., Junqua, G., & Zuindeau, B. (2017). Écologie industrielle et territoriale à l'heure de la transition écologique et sociale de l'économie. Revue d'Économie Régionale & Urbaine, Décembre (5), 771-796. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.175.0771
  9. Holland, G., & Sene, O. (2010). Elinor Ostrom et la Gouvernance Economique. Revue d'économie politique, 120(3), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.203.0441
  10. Buclet, N. (2012). Territoire, innovation et développement durable : L'émergence d'un nouveau régime conventionnel ?: Revue d'Économie Régionale & Urbaine, décembre(5), 911-940. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.115.0911