Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0389
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0389
A Superstructure Approach for Optimization of Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) Chromatography
Eva Sorensen, Dian Ning Chia, Fanyi Duanmu
June 27, 2025
Abstract
One of the most successful continuous high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) processes for drug manufacturing is the Simulated Moving Bed (SMB). SMB is a multi-column, continuous, chromatographic process that can handle much higher throughputs than regular batch chromatographic processes. The process is initially transient, but eventually arrives at a cyclic steady state, which makes optimization very challenging, even more so when superstructure optimization is involved. To simplify the optimization problem, many researchers fixed the SMB structure, optimizing only the continuous variables, so they cannot be considered superstructure optimization. In this work, an SMB superstructure that can simultaneously optimize column structure and operation is proposed. The results showed that the superstructure proposed is reliable, and it is more efficient compared to current optimization approaches if the optimal column structure has to be identified.
Keywords
Chromatography, gProms, Modelling and Simulations, Optimization, Particle Swarm Optimization, Process Design, Simulated Moving Bed, Superstructure
Suggested Citation
Sorensen E, Chia DN, Duanmu F. A Superstructure Approach for Optimization of Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) Chromatography. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1474-1479 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.130271
Author Affiliations
Sorensen E: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom
Chia DN: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom
Duanmu F: Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1474
Last Page
1479
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1474-1479-1453-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0389
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.130271
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
534
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0389
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Dünnebier G, Weirich I, Klatt KU. Computationally efficient dynamic modelling and simulation of simulated moving bed chromatographic processes with linear isotherms. Chem Eng Sci 53(14):2537-46 (1998). 10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00076-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00076-1
  2. Li S, Kawajiri Y, Raisch J, Seidel-Morgenstern A. Optimization of simulated moving bed chromatography with fractionation and feedback: Part I. Fractionation of one outlet. J Chromatogr A 1217(33):5337-48 (2010). 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.06.031 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.06.031
  3. Coelho LCD, Filho NML, Faria RPV, Ferreira AFP, Ribeiro AM, Rodrigues AE. Separation of tartronic and glyceric acids by simulated moving bed chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1563:62-70 (2018). 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.05.052 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.05.052
  4. Nilchan S, Pantelides CC. On the Optimisation of Periodic Adsorption Processes. Adsorption 4(2):113-47 (1998). 10.1023/A:1008823102106 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008823102106
  5. Kloppenburg E, Gilles ED. A New Concept for Operating Simulated Moving-Bed Processes. Chem Eng Technol 22(10):813-7 (1999). 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(199910)22:10<813::AID-CEAT813>3.0.CO;2-G https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(199910)22:10<813::AID-CEAT813>3.0.CO;2-G
  6. Toumi A, Engell S, Diehl M, Bock HG, Schlöder J. Efficient optimization of simulated moving bed processes. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 46(11):1067-84 (2007). 10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.026
  7. Sumedha M, Bhartiya S. Dual switch simulated moving bed chromatography: An optimal two-fraction yielding separation process. J Chromatogr A 1682:463449 (2022). 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463449 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463449
  8. Kawajiri Y, Biegler LT. Large scale nonlinear optimization for asymmetric operation and design of Simulated Moving Beds. J Chromatogr A 1133(1):226-40 (2006). 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.037 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.037
  9. Kawajiri Y, Biegler LT. Nonlinear Programming Superstructure for Optimal Dynamic Operations of Simulated Moving Bed Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(25):8503-13 (2006). 10.1021/ie0601192 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0601192
  10. Kawajiri Y, Biegler LT. Large scale optimization strategies for zone configuration of simulated moving beds. Comput Chem Eng 32(1):135-44 (2008). 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.04.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.04.009
  11. Chan S, Titchener-Hooker N, Sørensen E. Optimal Economic Design and Operation of Single- and Multi-column Chromatographic Processes. Biotechnol Prog 24(2):389-401 (2008). 10.1021/bp070270m https://doi.org/10.1021/bp070270m
  12. Chia DN, Sorensen E. Optimal design of hybrid distillation-membrane processes based on a superstructure approach. Chem Eng Res Des 194:256-79 (2023). 10.1016/j.cherd.2023.04.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.04.014