Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0376
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0376
Differentiation between Process and Equipment Drifts in Chemical Plants
Linda Eydam, Lukas Furtner, Julius Lorenz, Leon Urbas
June 27, 2025
Abstract
The performance of chemical plants is inevitably related to knowledge about the current state of the system. However, both process and equipment drifts may distort state information. Deviations of process values caused by equipment malfunction may be misinterpreted as process drifts and vice versa. Determining the cause of the drift is further complicated by the fact that equipment drifts typically occur in combination with process drifts. This paper presents a method that uses available additional equipment data to reliably detect and decouple combined equipment and process drifts in chemical plants by combining statistical methods with model-based approaches. The utility of additional equipment information is assessed based on its effect on the decoupling of process and equipment drifts. First results demonstrate the feasibility of the approach in a real plant.
Keywords
Coupled Drifts, Fault Detection, Modelling, Namur Open Architecture, Process Monitoring
Suggested Citation
Eydam L, Furtner L, Lorenz J, Urbas L. Differentiation between Process and Equipment Drifts in Chemical Plants. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1396-1402 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.124377
Author Affiliations
Eydam L: TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group, Dresden, 01069, Germany
Furtner L: TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group, Dresden, 01069, Germany
Lorenz J: TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Chair of Process Control Systems, Dresden, 01069, Germany
Urbas L: TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Process Systems Engineering Group, Dresden, 01069, Germany; TU Dresden, Process-to-Order Group, Chair of Process Control Systems, Dresden, 01069, Germany
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1396
Last Page
1402
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1396-1402-1346-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0376
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.124377
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1178
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0376
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. P. Kadlec, B. Gabrys, and S. Strandt, "Data-driven Soft Sensors in the process industry," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 33, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Apr. 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.12.012
  2. "NAMUR NE 107 - Self-Monitoring and Diagnosis of Field Devices." NAMUR - Interessengemeinschaft Automatisierungstechnik der Prozessindustrie e.V., Oct. 04, 2017
  3. IEC, "IEC 60050 - International Electrotechnical Vocabulary - Details for IEV number 311-06-13: 'drift.'" Accessed: Jan. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://electropedia.org/iev/iev.nsf/display?openform&ievref=311-06-13
  4. V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, S. N. Kavuri, and K. Yin, "A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Mar. 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00160-6
  5. M. Du, J. Scott, and P. Mhaskar, "Actuator and sensor fault isolation of nonlinear process systems," Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 104, pp. 294-303, Dec. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.08.009
  6. M. Taiebat and F. Sassani, "Distinguishing sensor faults from system faults by utilizing minimum sensor redundancy," Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Eng., vol. 41, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Sep. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2017-1033
  7. R. Dunia and S. Joe Qin, "Joint diagnosis of process and sensor faults using principal component analysis," Control Engineering Practice, vol. 6, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Apr. 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(98)00027-6
  8. R. Dunia and S. Joe Qin, "A unified geometric approach to process and sensor fault identification and reconstruction: the unidimensional fault case," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 22, no. 7, Art. no. 7, Jul. 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(97)00277-9
  9. N. M. Nor, C. R. C. Hassan, and M. A. Hussain, "A review of data-driven fault detection and diagnosis methods: applications in chemical process systems," Reviews in Chemical Engineering, vol. 36, no. 4, Art. no. 4, May 2020, https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0069
  10. S. Heo and J. H. Lee, "Fault detection and classification using artificial neural networks," IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 18, Art. no. 18, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.380
(0.08 seconds)

[0.08 s]