Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0369
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0369
A Benchmark Simulation Model of Ammonia Production: Enabling Safe Innovation in the Emerging Renewable Hydrogen Economy
Niklas Groll, Gürkan Sin
June 27, 2025
Abstract
The green transition accelerates innovations and developments targeting the integration of green hydrogen in the chemical industry. However, all new hydrogen pathways and process designs must be tested on operability and safety. A big challenge is the typical fluctuating characteristic of green hydrogen supply that contrasts the steady-state operation of most conventional chemical processes. Therefore, to adequately assess control and monitoring techniques, a benchmark model tailored to the relevant aspects of the hydrogen economy is required. We introduce a benchmark model based on the production of green ammonia using the Haber-Bosch process that remains operable when coupled to a fluctuating hydrogen supply from water electrolysis. The main section of the process model is an adiabatic indirect cooled reactor system that provides realistic modeling of industrial applications. Like the ammonia reactor, all process units and the underlying control structure are precisely dimensioned to ensure feasible operation across various hydrogen supply rates. Eventually, the flexible operating ammonia benchmark model can serve as a new benchmark for analyzing process safety and control aspects.
Keywords
Process Safety, Renewable Ammonia Production, Simulation Benchmark Model
Suggested Citation
Groll N, Sin G. A Benchmark Simulation Model of Ammonia Production: Enabling Safe Innovation in the Emerging Renewable Hydrogen Economy. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1354-1359 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.164574
Author Affiliations
Groll N: Process and System Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Sin G: Process and System Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1354
Last Page
1359
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1354-1359-1232-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0369
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.164574
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1385
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0369
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Dawood F, Anda M, Shafiullah GM. Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 457:3847-69 (2020) doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059
  2. Olabi AG, Abdelkareem MA, Al-Murisi M, et al. Recent progress in Green Ammonia: Production, applications, assessment; barriers, and its role in achieving the sustainable development goals. Energy Convers Manag 277 (2023) doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116594 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116594
  3. Ishaq H, Crawford C. Review of ammonia production and utilization: Enabling clean energy transition and net-zero climate targets. Energy Convers Manag 300:117869 (2024) doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2023.117869 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117869
  4. MacFarlane DR, Cherepanov P V., Choi J, et al. A Roadmap to the Ammonia Economy. Joule 46:1186-205 (2020) doi.org/10.1016/J.JOULE.2020.04.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.004
  5. Smith C, Hill AK, Torrente-Murciano L. Current and future role of Haber-Bosch ammonia in a carbon-free energy landscape. Energy Environ Sci 132:331-44 (2020) doi.org/10.1039/C9EE02873K https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE02873K
  6. Bicer Y, Dincer I, Zamfirescu C, Vezina G, Raso F. Comparative life cycle assessment of various ammonia production methods. J Clean Prod 135:1379-95 (2016) doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.07.023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.023
  7. Downs JJ, Vogel EF. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput Chem Eng 173:245-55 (1993) doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-I https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-I
  8. Birol G, Ündey C, Çinar A. A modular simulation package for fed-batch fermentation: penicillin production. Comput Chem Eng 2611:1553-65 (2002) doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00127-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00127-8
  9. Santander O, Kuppuraj V, Harrison CA, Baldea M. An open source fluid catalytic cracker - fractionator model to support the development and benchmarking of process control, machine learning and operation strategies. Comput Chem Eng 164:107900 (2022) doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107900 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107900
  10. Sandberg ME, Colby GM. Limitations of ASME PTC 10 in Accurately Evaluation Centrifugal Compressor Thermodynamic Performance. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Turbomachinery Symposium. Turbomachinery Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University (2013) doi.org/10.21423/R1505Q
  11. Rosbo JW, Jensen AD, Jørgensen JB, Huusom JK. Comparison, operation and cooling design of three general reactor types for Power-to-Ammonia processes. Chem Eng J 496:153660 (2024) doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.153660 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.153660
  12. Khademi MH, Sabbaghi RS. Comparison between three types of ammonia synthesis reactor configurations in terms of cooling methods. Chem Eng Res Des 128:306-17 (2017) doi.org/10.1016/J.CHERD.2017.10.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.10.021
  13. Morud JC, Skogestad S. Analysis of instability in an industrial ammonia reactor. AIChE J 444:888-95 (1998) doi.org/10.1002/AIC.690440414 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690440414
  14. Fahr S, Schiedeck M, Schwarzhuber J, Rehfeldt S, Peschel A, Klein H. Design and thermodynamic analysis of a large-scale ammonia reactor for increased load flexibility. Chem Eng J. 471:144612 (2023) doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2023.144612 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144612
  15. Shiva Kumar S, Himabindu V. Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis - A review. Mater Sci Energy Technol 23:442-54 (2019) doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002
  16. Aneke M, Wang M. Potential for improving the energy efficiency of cryogenic air separation unit (ASU) using binary heat recovery cycles. Appl Therm Eng 81:223-31 (2015) doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.02.034 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.02.034
(0.08 seconds)

[0.08 s]