Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0316
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0316
Probabilistic Model Predictive Control for Mineral Flotation using Gaussian Processes
Victor Dehon, Paulina Quintanilla, Antonio Del Rio Chanona
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Recent advancements in machine learning and time series analysis have opened new avenues for improving predictive control in complex systems such as mineral flotation. Techniques leveraging multivariate predictive control in mineral flotation have seen significant progress in recent years. However, challenges in developing an accurate dynamic model that encapsulates both the pulp and froth phases have hindered further advancements. Now, with a readily available model containing equations that describe the physics of flotation froths, an opportunity for novel control strategies presents itself. In this study, a Gaussian Process (GP) Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy is proposed to integrate uncertainty quantification directly into the control framework. By leveraging the probabilistic nature of GP models, this approach captures process variability and adapts dynamically to new data, ensuring continuous refinement of the GP model within the MPC strategy. Unlike previous implementations where model parameters remained static, this methodology updates the GP model in real time, allowing for improved decision-making in the face of process uncertainty. The GP model was trained, optimized with JAX, evaluated using relevant metrics, and implemented as a surrogate within the MPC framework. The results demonstrate the capability of the GP model to accurately represent process dynamics while minimising prediction errors. Moreover, incorporating uncertainty reduction through standard deviation minimisation in the objective function enhances both control performance and system robustness. This paper sets the basis for the potential of using GP-MPC to enhance both the accuracy and robustness of mineral froth flotation control.
Keywords
Gaussian Processes, Machine Learning, Mineral Flotation, Model Predictive Control
Suggested Citation
Dehon V, Quintanilla P, Chanona ADR. Probabilistic Model Predictive Control for Mineral Flotation using Gaussian Processes. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1023-1028 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.122018
Author Affiliations
Dehon V: Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Quintanilla P: Department of Chemical Engineering, Brunel University of London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
Chanona ADR: Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1023
Last Page
1028
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1023-1028-1266-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0316
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.122018
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1394
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0316
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. McCoy JT, Auret L. Machine learning applications in minerals processing: A review. Minerals Engineering. 2019;132:95-109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.12.004
  2. Wang B, Peng Y. The effect of saline water on mineral flotation--A critical review. Minerals Engineering. 2014;66:13-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2014.04.017
  3. Quintanilla P, Neethling SJ, Brito-Parada PR. Modelling for froth flotation control: A review. Minerals Engineering. 2021;162:106718 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106718
  4. Quintanilla P, Navia D, Neethling S, Brito-Parada P. Experimental implementation of an economic model predictive control for froth flotation. In: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Elsevier; 2024. p. 1759-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50294-5
  5. Quintanilla P, Neethling SJ, Navia D, Brito-Parada PR. A dynamic flotation model for predictive control incorporating froth physics. Part I: Model development. Miner Eng 173:107192 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107192
  6. Quintanilla P, Neethling SJ, Mesa D, Navia D, Brito-Parada PR. A dynamic flotation model for predictive control incorporating froth physics. Part II: Model calibration and validation. Minerals Engineering. 2021;173:107190 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107190
  7. Girard A, Rasmussen CE, Quinonero Candela J, Murray-Smith R. Gaussian process priors with uncertain inputs & application to multiple-step ahead time series forecasting. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 15. MIT Press (2003)
  8. Wan K, Xu D, Cai Y. Data-driven-based model predictive control of reagents addition for tungsten flotation process. In: Proceedings of the 2021 China Automation Congress (CAC), IEEE, pp. 1629-1634 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC53003.2021.9728500
  9. Cubillos FA, Lima EL. Identification and optimizing control of a rougher flotation circuit using an adaptable hybrid-neural model. Miner Eng (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00050-2
  10. Google. JAX quickstart guide. Accessed: 2024-08-24. Available at: https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html (2023)
(0.1 seconds)

[0.1 s]