Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0274
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0274
Modular and Heterogeneous Electrolysis Systems: a System Flexibility Comparison
Hannes Lange, Michael Große, Isabell Viedt, Leon Urbas
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Green hydrogen will play a key role in the decarbonization of the steel sector via the direct reduction path [1]. To meet the demand side, both a highly efficient numbering-up based scaling strategy for water electrolysis is needed as well as flexible operation strategies that follow the fluctuating electricity load. This paper presents a modularization approach for electrolysis systems that addresses both aspects by combining different electrolysis technologies into one heterogeneous electrolysis system. We present a modular design of such a heterogeneous electrolysis system that can be scaled for large-scale applications. The impact of different degrees of technological and production capacity-related heterogeneity is investigated using system co-simulation to find an optimal solution for the goal-conflict, that the direct reduction of iron for green steel production requires a constant stream of hydrogen while the renewable electricity profile is fluctuating. For this use-case the distribution of technology and production capacity in the heterogeneous plant layout is optimized regarding overall system efficiency and the ability to follow flexible electricity profiles. The simulation results are compared with conventional homogenous electrolyser plant layouts. First results underline the benefits of combining different technologies and production capacities of individual systems in a large-scale heterogeneous electrolyser plant. It is shown that the presented modular electrolysis systems can follow the current flow without losing significant efficiency. However, for a downstream system that requires a constant hydrogen mass flow, supplementary hydrogen storage is required.
Keywords
Energy Efficiency, Energy Systems, Flexibility, Hydrogen, Lange-Große-Coefficient, Process Design, Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Suggested Citation
Lange H, Große M, Viedt I, Urbas L. Modular and Heterogeneous Electrolysis Systems: a System Flexibility Comparison. Systems and Control Transactions 4:759-764 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.177861
Author Affiliations
Lange H:
Große M:
Viedt I:
Urbas L:
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
759
Last Page
764
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0759-0764-1234-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0274
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.177861
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
579
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0274
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Wietschel M, Zheng L, Arens M, Helbing C, Ranzmeyer O, Schaadt A, et al. Metastudie Wasserstoff - Auswertung von Energiesystemstudien. Studie im Auftrag des Nationalen Wasserstoffrats. Karlsruhe, Freiberg, Cottbus: 2021
  2. Bittorf L, Beisswenger L, Erdmann D, Lorenz J, Klose A, Lange H, et al. Upcoming domains for the MTP and an evaluation of its usability for electrolysis. 2022 IEEE 27th international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), 2022, p. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA52439.2022.9921280
  3. Lange H, Klose A, Beisswenger L, Erdmann D, Urbas L. Modularization approach for large-scale electrolysis systems: a review. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2024:10.1039.D3SE01588B. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SE01588B
  4. Lange H, Schirmer C, Mock M, Viedt I, Klose A, Urbas L. Operation Strategies for Modular Large-Scale Alkaline Electrolysis Systems. 2024 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Beijing, China: IEEE; 2024, p. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN58382.2024.10774361
  5. Mock M, Viedt I, Lange H, Urbas L. Heterogenous electrolysis plants as enabler of efficient and flexible Power-to-X value chains. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 53, Elsevier; 2024, p. 1885-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50315-X
  6. ISE F. Day-ahead auktion vs. Solar + wind onshore + wind offshore in deutschland, 2022. Energy-Charts 2023
  7. Albrecht U, Ball M, Bünger U, Kutz C, Michalski J. Metastudie zu den technischen, technologischen und wirtschaftlichen Parametern für die Umstellung der deutschen Stahlindustrie auf eine emissionsarme Stahlproduktion auf Basis von grünem Wasserstoff 2022
  8. Hölling M, Weng M, Gellert S. Bewertung der Herstellung von Eisenschwamm unter Verwendung von Wasserstoff (Evaluation of the production of sponge iron using hydrogen). Eisen & Stahl 2017;6:47-56
  9. Nuber D, Eichberger H, Rollinger B. Circored fine ore direct reduction. MILLENNIUM STEEL 2006:37-40
  10. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Solar Power Data for Integration Studies 2024. https://www.nrel.gov/grid/solar-power-data.html (accessed November 14, 2024)
  11. Lange H, Klose A, Lippmann W, Urbas L. Technical evaluation of the flexibility of water electrolysis systems to increase energy flexibility: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:15771-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.044
  12. VDI e. V., editor. VDI-Wärmeatlas. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19981-3
  13. Gusain D, Cvetkovic M, Palensky P. Quantification of operational flexibility from a portfolio of flexible energy resources. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2022;141:107466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107466
  14. Fazio J, Hua D. Three probabilistic metrics for adequacy assessment of the Pacific Northwest power system. Electric Power Systems Research 2019;174:105858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2019.04.036
  15. European Hydrogen Observatory. Levelised Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) Calculator 2024
  16. Lorenz J, Klose A, Lange H, Kock T, Urbas L. Flexible Process Control for Scalable Electrolysis Systems. III. International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET 2023), Cape Town-South Africa: IEEE; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECET58911.2023.10389401