Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0268
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0268
Genetic Algorithm-Driven Design of CCUS and Hydrogen Pipeline Networks: Decentralised Expansion with Complex Geographical Constraints
Joseph Hammond, Solomon Brown
June 27, 2025
Abstract
The development of Carbon Capture, Transport, and Storage (CCTS) and hydrogen pipeline networks is crucial for achieving deep decarbonisation in industrial sectors. However, existing network design models often assume perfect foresight, limiting their applicability to real-world infrastructure planning, which is inherently uncertain and iterative. This study introduces a novel rolling-horizon methodology for pipeline network expansion, leveraging a genetic algorithm-based approach that allows for adaptive routing and incremental infrastructure development. By comparing rolling-horizon designs to 2050-optimised networks in a case study of the Humber region in the UK, the analysis highlights the trade-offs between adaptability and cost efficiency. Results indicate that while rolling-horizon approaches better reflect real-world decision-making, they also introduce inefficiencies, increasing capital expenditures by approximately 8% for both hydrogen and CCTS infrastructure. Additionally, the study examines the economic risks associated with transitioning from blue to green hydrogen production, revealing a 20-fold increase in CCTS costs per tonne of CO2 when hydrogen production shifts to green. The findings underscore the importance of integrating uncertainty-aware strategies in infrastructure planning to mitigate inefficiencies while maintaining adaptability to technological and policy changes.
Keywords
Carbon capture transport and storage, GIS, Hydrogen, Infrastructure, Rolling-horizon
Suggested Citation
Hammond J, Brown S. Genetic Algorithm-Driven Design of CCUS and Hydrogen Pipeline Networks: Decentralised Expansion with Complex Geographical Constraints. Systems and Control Transactions 4:723-728 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.101985
Author Affiliations
Hammond J: School of Chemical, Materials, and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Brown S: School of Chemical, Materials, and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
723
Last Page
728
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0723-0728-1153-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0268
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.101985
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
504
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0268
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. HM Government. Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy. Pages 45-28, March 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/industrial-decarbonisation-strategy
  2. Gerres T., Ávila J., Llamas P., et al. A review of cross-sector decarbonisation potentials in the European energy intensive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.012
  3. Rissman J., Bataille C., Masanet E., et al. Technologies and policies to decarbonise global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Applied Energy (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848
  4. Middleton R.S., Kuby M.J., Bielicki J.M. Generating candidate networks for optimisation: The CO2 capture and storage optimisation problem. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 36(1):18-29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.002
  5. Babaei F., Bozorgmehry Boozarjomehry R., Kheirkhah Ravandi Z., Pishvaie S.M.R. A techno-economic analysis framework for power system-aware co-expansion planning of integrated gas transmission networks and chemical industries toward sustainable multi-energy systems. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2022.100893
  6. Hammond J., Rosenberg M., Brown S. Understanding costs in hydrogen infrastructure networks: A multi-stage approach for spatially-aware pipeline design. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 102:430-443 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.273
  7. André J., Auray S., Brac J., et al. Design and dimensioning of hydrogen transmission pipeline networks. European Journal of Operational Research 229(1):239-251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.036
  8. Moreno-Benito M., Agnolucci P., Papageorgiou L.G. Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: Optimisation-based framework for hydrogen infrastructure development. Computers and Chemical Engineering 102:110-127 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.08.005
  9. Elahi N., Shah N., Korre A., Durucan S. Multi-period least cost optimisation model of an integrated carbon dioxide capture, transportation, and storage infrastructure in the UK. Energy Procedia 63:2655-2662 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.288
  10. Becattini V., Gabrielli P., Antonini C., et al. Carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage supply chains: Optimal economic and environmental performance of infrastructure rollout. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103635
  11. Middleton R.S., Yaw S.P., Hoover B.A., Ellett K.M. SimCCS: An open-source tool for optimising CO2 capture, transport, and storage infrastructure. Environmental Modelling & Software 124:104560 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104560
  12. Johnson N., Ogden J. A spatially-explicit optimisation model for long-term hydrogen pipeline planning. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37(6):5421-5433 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.109
  13. Papadimitriou D., Fortz B. A rolling horizon heuristic for the multiperiod network design and routing problem. Networks 66(4):364-379 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/net.21663
  14. Powell W.B. Reinforcement Learning and Stochastic Optimization: A Unified Framework for Sequential Decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815068
  15. Hammond J., Rosenberg M., Brown S. A genetic algorithm-based design for hydrogen pipeline infrastructure with real geographical constraints. In: Manenti F., Reklaitis G.V. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering / 15th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering (ESCAPE34/PSE24) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50106-X
  16. Rosenberg M, French T, Reynolds M, While L. A genetic algorithm approach for the Euclidean steiner tree problem with soft obstacles. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference. ACM; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449639.3459397
  17. van den Broek M., Mesquita P., Carneiro J., Silva J.R., Berghout N., Ramírez A., Gouveia J.P., Seixas J., Cabal H., Martinez R., Rimi A., Zarhloule Y., Sardinha M., Boavida D., Tosato G. Region-specific challenges of a CO2 pipeline infrastructure in the West Mediterranean Sea. Energy Procedia 37:3137-3146 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.200
  18. Scott L., Anyszewekski A. New Pipeline AI Routing. Continuum Industries Technical Report (2022). Retrieved on Nov 2024, but no longer available online