LAPSE:2025.0259
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0259
Integrating Chemical Recycling into Brownfield Processes: Waste Polyethylene Pyrolysis and Naphtha Steam Cracking
June 27, 2025
Abstract
In this study, we evaluate the economic and environmental impacts of integrating waste polyethylene (PE) pyrolysis with naphtha-based steam cracking for 660 Mt/y ethylene production. We compare six integration scenarios to both business-as-usual (BAU) steam cracking and greenfield waste PE pyrolysis plant. We perform process simulations and equipment design in Aspen Plus® V12, followed by a techno-economic analysis (TEA) and a life-cycle assessment (LCA. The integration capacity we considered corresponds to one full-capacity PE pyrolysis furnace, reducing naphtha feed by 7% in BAU steam cracking. Through the TEA, we identify the most cost-effective scenario by merging the PE pyrolysis gas with the steam cracker furnace outlet after preheating the PE feed. This integration reduces production costs by 6.46MM/y, improving costs a 0.3% compared to BAU and 30% compared to the pyrolysis greenfield design. LCA results show that the greenfield pyrolysis plant achieves the lowest global warming potential (GWP), reducing emissions by 14% compared to BAU. Among the integration scenarios, lowest GWP occurs when PE pyrolysis gases, also with feed pre-heating, merge before the main compressor train, obtaining a 0.12% GWP reduction compared to BAU. This analysis highlights the potential of introducing circular technologies in existing plants to progressively shift from fossil fuel usage.
In this study, we evaluate the economic and environmental impacts of integrating waste polyethylene (PE) pyrolysis with naphtha-based steam cracking for 660 Mt/y ethylene production. We compare six integration scenarios to both business-as-usual (BAU) steam cracking and greenfield waste PE pyrolysis plant. We perform process simulations and equipment design in Aspen Plus® V12, followed by a techno-economic analysis (TEA) and a life-cycle assessment (LCA. The integration capacity we considered corresponds to one full-capacity PE pyrolysis furnace, reducing naphtha feed by 7% in BAU steam cracking. Through the TEA, we identify the most cost-effective scenario by merging the PE pyrolysis gas with the steam cracker furnace outlet after preheating the PE feed. This integration reduces production costs by 6.46MM/y, improving costs a 0.3% compared to BAU and 30% compared to the pyrolysis greenfield design. LCA results show that the greenfield pyrolysis plant achieves the lowest global warming potential (GWP), reducing emissions by 14% compared to BAU. Among the integration scenarios, lowest GWP occurs when PE pyrolysis gases, also with feed pre-heating, merge before the main compressor train, obtaining a 0.12% GWP reduction compared to BAU. This analysis highlights the potential of introducing circular technologies in existing plants to progressively shift from fossil fuel usage.
Record ID
Keywords
chemical recycling, circular economy, Ethylene, process integration, sustainable feedstock
Subject
Suggested Citation
Caballero M, Sroisamut T, Kiss AA, Somoza-Tornos A. Integrating Chemical Recycling into Brownfield Processes: Waste Polyethylene Pyrolysis and Naphtha Steam Cracking. Systems and Control Transactions 4:668-673 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.197516
Author Affiliations
Caballero M: Delft University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands
Sroisamut T: Delft University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands
Kiss AA: Delft University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands
Somoza-Tornos A: Delft University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands
Sroisamut T: Delft University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands
Kiss AA: Delft University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands
Somoza-Tornos A: Delft University of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
668
Last Page
673
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0668-0673-1698-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0259
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.197516
Article DOI
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
984
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0259
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
References Cited
- J. Slootweg. Sustainable chemistry: Green, circular, and safe-by-design. OneEarth, 7, 5, 754 - 758 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.006
- World Economic Forum, Ellen MacArthur Foundation and McKinsey & Company, The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the future of plastics (2016)
- European Green Deal, Putting an end to wasteful packaging, boosting reuse and recycling(2022)
- J. Garcia, M. Robertson. The future of plastics recycling. Science, 358, 6365 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0324
- H. Li, et al. Expanding plastics recycling technologies: chemical aspects, technology status and challenges. Green Chemistry, 24, 8899 - 9002 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC02588D
- K. Télessy, L. Barner, F. Holz. Repurposing natural gas pipelines for hydrogen: Limits and options from a case study in Germany. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 80, 821 - 831 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.110
- A. Somoza -Tornos, A. Gonzalez-Garay, C. Pozo, M. Graells, A. Espuña, G. Guillén-Gosálbez. Realizing the Potential High Benefits of Circular Economy in the Chemical Industry: Ethylene Monomer Recovery via Polyethylene Pyrolysis. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 8,9, 3561 - 3572 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04835
- V. Spallina, I. Campos Velarde, J.A. Medrano Jimenez, H. Reza Godini, F. Gallucci, M. van Sint Annaland. Techno-economic assessment of different routes for olefins production through the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM): Advances in benchmark technologies. Energy Conservation and Management, 154, 244 - 261 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.061
- P. Kanan, A. Al Shoaibi, C. Srinivasakannan. Temperature effects on the yield of gaseous olefins from waste polyethylene via flash pyrolysis. Energy & Fuels, 28(5): p/ 3363-3366 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500516n
- G. Towler, R. Sinnott. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. Ed: Third edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier. (2021)
- R. Turton, J. Shaeiwith, D. Bhattacharyya,W.B. Whiting. Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes. Ed: Fifth Edition (2018)
[0.25 s]

