Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0249
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0249
Potential of chemical looping for green hydrogen production from biogas: process design and techno-economic-environmental analysis
Donghyeon Kim, Minseong Park, Donggeun Kang, Dongin Jung, Siuk Roh, Jiyong Kim
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Hydrogen (H2), as the promising alternative to fossil fuel-based energy carriers, faces the critical challenge of diversifying its sources and lowering production costs. Biogas, produced from organic waste, offers a renewable and carbon-neutral option for H2 production, but its high CO2 content requires a pre-separation process of CO2 from CH4 or specialized catalysts for use in existing reforming processes. Chemical looping reforming (CLR), as an advanced H2 production process, uses an oxygen carrier (OC) as the oxidant, allowing raw biogas to be used directly in the reforming process. Recently, numerous studies on CLR design and analysis have demonstrated their growing economic feasibility. However, deploying the CLR process in the biogas treatment industry requires further research to analyze its technical, economic, and environmental performance under target capacities and H2 purity. This study proposes biogas-based CLR processes and analyzes the capability of the processes from techno-economic and environmental perspectives: ?) chemical looping partial oxidization (CLPO), ?) chemical looping steam reforming (CLSR), ?) chemical looping water splitting (CLWS), and ?) chemical looping CO2 splitting (CLCS). Evaluation metrics include energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, unit production cost (UPC), and net CO2 equivalent emission (NCE) to compare technical, economic, and environmental performance, respectively. Each process is simulated in Aspen Plus to obtain mass and energy balance data. The heat exchanger network (HEN) is optimized to maximize heat recovery and achieve autothermal conditions. As a result, we comparatively analyze the economic and environmental capability of the proposed processes by identifying the major cost drivers and CO2 emission contributors.
Suggested Citation
Kim D, Park M, Kang D, Jung D, Roh S, Kim J. Potential of chemical looping for green hydrogen production from biogas: process design and techno-economic-environmental analysis. Systems and Control Transactions 4:607-612 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.102795
Author Affiliations
Kim D: Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Park M: Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Kang D: Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Jung D: Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Roh S: Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Kim J: Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
607
Last Page
612
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0607-0612-1566-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0249
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.102795
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
486
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0249
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. He G, Mallapragada DS, Bose A, Heuberger-Austin CF, Gençer E. Sector coupling via hydrogen to lower the cost of energy system decarbonization. Energy Environ. Sci. 14:4635-4646 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE00627D
  2. Dincer I, Acar C. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:11094-11111 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035
  3. Schmidt O, Gambhir A, Staffell I, Hawkes A, Nelson J, Few S. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: an expert elicitation study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:30470-30492 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045
  4. Angelidaki I, Xie L, Søndergaard T, Ahring BK, Cavinato C, et al. Biogas upgrading and utilization: current status and perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 36:452-466 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011
  5. Abatzoglou N, Boivin S. A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 3:42-71 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.117
  6. Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, Fahl F. Biogas: developments and perspectives in Europe. Renew Energy 129:457-472 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006
  7. Hossain MM, de Lasa HI. Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations-a review. Chem Eng Sci 63:4433-4451 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.028
  8. Lu Y, Zhang X, Wang S, Chen H. Current challenges and prospects of water electrolysis for hydrogen production: from materials to system engineering. Int J Hydrogen Energy (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.212
  9. Adánez J, Abad A, García-Labiano F, Gayán P, de Diego LF. Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Energy Fuels 26:718-733 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1021/ef3020475
  10. Santos JC, Soares JBP, Secchi AR. Modeling and simulation of polyethylene production in a fluidized bed reactor. Braz J Chem Eng 24:237-250 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322000000200004
  11. S. Lehtoranta, E. Tampio, S. Rasi, J. Laakso, K. Vikki, and S. Luostarinen, The implications of management practices on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in biogas production, J. Environ. Manage. 366, 121884 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121884