Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0155
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0155
Data-Driven Modelling of Biogas Production Using Multi-Task Gaussian Processes
Benaissa Dekhici, Michael Short
June 27, 2025
Abstract
This study introduces the novel application of a Multi-Task Gaussian Process (MTGP) model to predict biogas production and critical anaerobic digestion (AD) performance indicators (soluble COD, volatile fatty acids (VFAs)), addressing feedstock variability and dynamic process behavior. We compare the MTGP against the widely used mechanistic AM2 model to evaluate its accuracy and applicability for probabilistic modeling in AD systems. The MTGP framework leverages multi-output correlations and uncertainty quantification, trained on experimental data, achieving superior predictive performance over AM2in this study, with lower RMSE (SCOD: 0.32 g/L; VFAs: 0.87 mmol/L; biogas: 0.15 L/day) and higher R² values (SCOD:0.91, VFAs:0.94, biogas :0.88) under the conditions tested. While AM2 provides biochemical insights, its reliance on unvalidated assumptions may limits robustness. The flexibility of MTGP and precision suggest its potential for real-world applications such as Bayesian Optimization and Design of Experiments, enabling data-driven process enhancement without mechanistic constraints. This work establishes MTGP as a pioneering tool for AD optimization, bridging data-driven efficiency with practical bioenergy challenges.
Keywords
Anaerobic Digestion, Biogas Production, Data-driven Modelling, Mechanistic Modeling, Multi-Task Gaussian Process, Predictive Analytics
Suggested Citation
Dekhici B, Short M. Data-Driven Modelling of Biogas Production Using Multi-Task Gaussian Processes. Systems and Control Transactions 4:26-32 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.121877
Author Affiliations
Dekhici B: School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom; Supergen Bioenergy Impact Hub, Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute, UK
Short M: School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom; Supergen Bioenergy Impact Hub, Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute, UK
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
26
Last Page
32
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0026-0032-1149-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0155
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.121877
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
1262
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0155
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Ahmed M, Sartori F, Merzari F, Fiori L, Elagroudy S, Negm MS, Andreottola G. Anaerobic degradation of digestate-based hydrothermal carbonization products in a continuous hybrid fixed bed anaerobic filter. Bioresour Technol 330:124971 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124971
  2. Alvi M, Batstone D, Mbamba CK, Keymer P, French T, Ward A, Dwyer J, Cardell-Oliver R. Deep learning in wastewater treatment: a critical review. Water Res 245:120518 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120518
  3. Bynum, Michael L., Gabriel A. Hackebeil, William E. Hart, Carl D. Laird, Bethany L. Nicholson, John D. Siirola, Jean-Paul Watson, and David L. Woodruff. Pyomo - Optimization Modeling in Python. Third Edition Vol. 67. Springer, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68928-5_5
  4. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. The MIT Press (2005) https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001
  5. Batstone D, Keller J, Angelidaki I, Kalyuzhnyi S, Pavlostathis S, Rozzi A, Sanders W, Siegrist H, Vavilin V. The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci Technol 45:65-73 (2002) https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0292
  6. Bernard O, Hadj-Sadok Z, Dochain D, Genovesi A, Steyer J-P. Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process. Biotechnol Bioeng 75:424-438 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10036
  7. Bonilla EV, Chai K, Williams C. Multi-task Gaussian process prediction. In: Platt J, Koller D, Singer Y, Roweis S (Eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 20. Curran Associates, Inc. (2007)
  8. Dekhici B. Data-driven modeling, order reduction and control of anaerobic digestion processes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tlemcen (2024)
  9. Dekhici B, Benyahia B, Cherki B, Fiori L, Andreottola G. Modeling of biogas production from hydrothermal carbonization products in a continuous anaerobic digester. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 34: (2024) https://doi.org/10.1145/3680281
  10. Goulard M, Voltz M. Linear coregionalization model: Tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix. Math Geol 24:269-286 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00893750
  11. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
  12. Dekhici B, Benyahia B and Cherki B, Data-driven control of the chemostat using the Koopman operator theory, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series C, Vol. 85, Issu. 2, pp 137-150, 2023
(0.08 seconds)

[0.09 s]