LAPSE:2023.26773
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.26773
Experimental Investigation of Inhibitive Drilling Fluids Performance: Case Studies from United States Shale Basins
April 3, 2023
Abstract
Shale formations are attractive prospects due to their potential in oil and gas production. Some of the largest shale formations in the mainland US, such as the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS), have reserves estimated to be around 7 billion barrels. Despite their huge potential, shale formations present major concerns for drilling operators. These prospects have unique challenges because of all their alteration and incompatibility issues with drilling and completion fluids. Most shale formations undergo numerous chemical and physical alterations, making their interaction with the drilling and completion fluid systems very complex to understand. In this study, a high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) drilling simulator was used to mimic real time drilling operations to investigate the performance of inhibitive drilling fluid systems in two major shale formations (Eagle Ford Shale and Tuscaloosa Marine Shale). A series of drilling experiments using the drilling simulator and clay swelling tests were conducted to evaluate the drilling performance of the KCl drilling fluid and cesium formate brine systems and their effectiveness in minimizing drilling concerns. Cylindrical cores were used to mimic vertical wellbores. It was found that the inhibitive muds systems (KCl and cesium formate) provided improved drilling performance compared to conventional fluid systems. Among the inhibitive systems, the cesium formate brine showed the best drilling performances due to its low swelling rate and improved drilling performance.
Shale formations are attractive prospects due to their potential in oil and gas production. Some of the largest shale formations in the mainland US, such as the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS), have reserves estimated to be around 7 billion barrels. Despite their huge potential, shale formations present major concerns for drilling operators. These prospects have unique challenges because of all their alteration and incompatibility issues with drilling and completion fluids. Most shale formations undergo numerous chemical and physical alterations, making their interaction with the drilling and completion fluid systems very complex to understand. In this study, a high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) drilling simulator was used to mimic real time drilling operations to investigate the performance of inhibitive drilling fluid systems in two major shale formations (Eagle Ford Shale and Tuscaloosa Marine Shale). A series of drilling experiments using the drilling simulator and clay swelling tests were conducted to evaluate the drilling performance of the KCl drilling fluid and cesium formate brine systems and their effectiveness in minimizing drilling concerns. Cylindrical cores were used to mimic vertical wellbores. It was found that the inhibitive muds systems (KCl and cesium formate) provided improved drilling performance compared to conventional fluid systems. Among the inhibitive systems, the cesium formate brine showed the best drilling performances due to its low swelling rate and improved drilling performance.
Record ID
Keywords
drilling performance, friction factor, inhibitive drilling fluids, rate of penetration, swelling, torque
Subject
Suggested Citation
Konate N, Salehi S. Experimental Investigation of Inhibitive Drilling Fluids Performance: Case Studies from United States Shale Basins. (2023). LAPSE:2023.26773
Author Affiliations
Konate N: School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, 660 Parrington Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA [ORCID]
Salehi S: School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, 660 Parrington Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Salehi S: School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, 660 Parrington Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
13
Issue
19
Article Number
E5142
Year
2020
Publication Date
2020-10-02
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en13195142, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.26773
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195142
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
261
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Apr 3, 2023
Verified by curator on
Apr 3, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.26773
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
