LAPSE:2023.1866
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.1866
Comparison of Experimental Results from Operating a Novel Fluidized Bed Classifier with CFD Simulations Applying Different Drag Models and Model Validation
February 21, 2023
Abstract
A cold-flow lab-scale cross-flow fluidized bed classifier was simulated using the CFD software Barracuda VR®. The purpose of the study was to identify the most suitable drag model and make the model adjustments that provide the best representation of the flow situation in the classifier when comparing the results with the experimental data. Two particle types were used in the simulations and in the experiments: zirconia (median diameter 69 µm, skeletal density 3830 kg/m3) and steel (290 µm, 7790 kg/m3). Ten different cases, with different solids loading values, were investigated: three with pure zirconia particles, three with pure steel particles, and four with a mixture of zirconia (28%) and steel (72%). Several different drag models were tried out in the simulations. However, none of the available models were able to predict the classification efficiency observed in experiments with their default settings. Although most of the drag models correctly predicted the inversely proportional behavior of the classification efficiency vs. solids loading, the classification efficiency was overpredicted. It was observed that a combined WenYu/Ergun drag model gave a wide range of accuracy, by being able to capture the behavior of both dense and dilute particle systems. Even though the predictions of the classification efficiency for steel particles were acceptable, a larger deviation was observed with Geldart A zirconia particles. CFD simulations with the WenYu and Ergun combined drag model were used for further validation against the experimental observations. In this case, previously published experimental data for fluidization of pure Zirconia particles were used. The fluidization of zirconia was modelled in Barracuda VR® with adjustment of the combined WenYu/Ergun drag model parameter (k1), to obtain a suitable validation. Furthermore, the effect of adding the blended acceleration model (BAM) for the fluidization simulations is discussed. It was observed that the fixed bed pressure drop was very accurate compared to the experimental observation, but the pressure drop after the fluidization was slightly overpredicted.
A cold-flow lab-scale cross-flow fluidized bed classifier was simulated using the CFD software Barracuda VR®. The purpose of the study was to identify the most suitable drag model and make the model adjustments that provide the best representation of the flow situation in the classifier when comparing the results with the experimental data. Two particle types were used in the simulations and in the experiments: zirconia (median diameter 69 µm, skeletal density 3830 kg/m3) and steel (290 µm, 7790 kg/m3). Ten different cases, with different solids loading values, were investigated: three with pure zirconia particles, three with pure steel particles, and four with a mixture of zirconia (28%) and steel (72%). Several different drag models were tried out in the simulations. However, none of the available models were able to predict the classification efficiency observed in experiments with their default settings. Although most of the drag models correctly predicted the inversely proportional behavior of the classification efficiency vs. solids loading, the classification efficiency was overpredicted. It was observed that a combined WenYu/Ergun drag model gave a wide range of accuracy, by being able to capture the behavior of both dense and dilute particle systems. Even though the predictions of the classification efficiency for steel particles were acceptable, a larger deviation was observed with Geldart A zirconia particles. CFD simulations with the WenYu and Ergun combined drag model were used for further validation against the experimental observations. In this case, previously published experimental data for fluidization of pure Zirconia particles were used. The fluidization of zirconia was modelled in Barracuda VR® with adjustment of the combined WenYu/Ergun drag model parameter (k1), to obtain a suitable validation. Furthermore, the effect of adding the blended acceleration model (BAM) for the fluidization simulations is discussed. It was observed that the fixed bed pressure drop was very accurate compared to the experimental observation, but the pressure drop after the fluidization was slightly overpredicted.
Record ID
Keywords
Barracuda, Computational Fluid Dynamics, CPFD, drag models, fluidized bed, powder classification, validation
Subject
Suggested Citation
Jayarathna CK, Balfe M, Moldestad BE, Tokheim LA. Comparison of Experimental Results from Operating a Novel Fluidized Bed Classifier with CFD Simulations Applying Different Drag Models and Model Validation. (2023). LAPSE:2023.1866
Author Affiliations
Jayarathna CK: SINTEF Industry, Forskningsparken, Hydrovegen 67, 3936 Porsgrunn, Norway [ORCID]
Balfe M: GE Power, Steam Power Systems, GE Carbon Capture GmbH, Turbinenstr. 5, 68309 Mannheim, Germany
Moldestad BE: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
Tokheim LA: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
Balfe M: GE Power, Steam Power Systems, GE Carbon Capture GmbH, Turbinenstr. 5, 68309 Mannheim, Germany
Moldestad BE: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
Tokheim LA: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
10
Issue
9
First Page
1855
Year
2022
Publication Date
2022-09-14
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr10091855, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.1866
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091855
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
382
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Feb 21, 2023
Verified by curator on
Feb 21, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.1866
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
(0.07 seconds)
[0.07 s]
