LAPSE:2023.17728
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.17728
A Review of Nanomaterial Based Scintillators
March 6, 2023
Abstract
Recently, nanomaterial-based scintillators are newly emerging technologies for many research fields, including medical imaging, nuclear security, nuclear decommissioning, and astronomical applications, among others. To date, scintillators have played pivotal roles in the development of modern science and technology. Among them, plastic scintillators have a low atomic number and are mainly used for beta-ray measurements owing to their low density, but these types of scintillators can be manufactured not in large sizes but also in various forms with distinct properties and characteristics. However, the plastic scintillator is mainly composed of C, H, O and N, implying that the probability of a photoelectric effect is low. In a gamma-ray nuclide analysis, they are used for time-related measurements given their short luminescence decay times. Generally, inorganic scintillators have relatively good scintillation efficiency rates and resolutions. And there are thus widely used in gamma-ray spectroscopy. Therefore, developing a plastic scintillator with performance capabilities similar to those of an inorganic scintillator would mean that it could be used for detection and monitoring at radiological sites. Many studies have reported improved performance outcomes of plastic scintillators based on nanomaterials, exhibiting high-performance plastic scintillators or flexible film scintillators using graphene, perovskite, and 2D materials. Furthermore, numerous fabrication methods that improve the performance through the doping of nanomaterials on the surface have been introduced. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of the findings pertaining to nanomaterial-based scintillators to gain a better understanding of radiological detection technological applications.
Recently, nanomaterial-based scintillators are newly emerging technologies for many research fields, including medical imaging, nuclear security, nuclear decommissioning, and astronomical applications, among others. To date, scintillators have played pivotal roles in the development of modern science and technology. Among them, plastic scintillators have a low atomic number and are mainly used for beta-ray measurements owing to their low density, but these types of scintillators can be manufactured not in large sizes but also in various forms with distinct properties and characteristics. However, the plastic scintillator is mainly composed of C, H, O and N, implying that the probability of a photoelectric effect is low. In a gamma-ray nuclide analysis, they are used for time-related measurements given their short luminescence decay times. Generally, inorganic scintillators have relatively good scintillation efficiency rates and resolutions. And there are thus widely used in gamma-ray spectroscopy. Therefore, developing a plastic scintillator with performance capabilities similar to those of an inorganic scintillator would mean that it could be used for detection and monitoring at radiological sites. Many studies have reported improved performance outcomes of plastic scintillators based on nanomaterials, exhibiting high-performance plastic scintillators or flexible film scintillators using graphene, perovskite, and 2D materials. Furthermore, numerous fabrication methods that improve the performance through the doping of nanomaterials on the surface have been introduced. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of the findings pertaining to nanomaterial-based scintillators to gain a better understanding of radiological detection technological applications.
Record ID
Keywords
2D materials, detection, Energy, nanomaterials, nanoparticle, scintillators
Subject
Suggested Citation
Min S, Kang H, Seo B, Cheong J, Roh C, Hong S. A Review of Nanomaterial Based Scintillators. (2023). LAPSE:2023.17728
Author Affiliations
Min S: Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung-Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Korea; Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea
Kang H: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea
Seo B: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea
Cheong J: Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung-Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Korea [ORCID]
Roh C: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea; Quantum Energy Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology (UST), 217 Gajeong-ro, Daejeon 34113, Korea [ORCID]
Hong S: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea
Kang H: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea
Seo B: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea
Cheong J: Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung-Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Korea [ORCID]
Roh C: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea; Quantum Energy Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology (UST), 217 Gajeong-ro, Daejeon 34113, Korea [ORCID]
Hong S: Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea
Journal Name
Energies
Volume
14
Issue
22
First Page
7701
Year
2021
Publication Date
2021-11-17
ISSN
1996-1073
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: en14227701, Publication Type: Review
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2023.17728
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227701
Publisher Version
Download
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
219
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Mar 6, 2023
Verified by curator on
Mar 6, 2023
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2023.17728
Record Owner
Auto Uploader for LAPSE
Links to Related Works
