LAPSE:2021.0771
Published Article
LAPSE:2021.0771
Microemulsion vs. Precipitation: Which Is the Best Synthesis of Nickel−Ceria Catalysts for Ethanol Steam Reforming?
Cristina Pizzolitto, Federica Menegazzo, Elena Ghedini, Arturo Martínez Arias, Vicente Cortés Corberán, Michela Signoretto
October 14, 2021
Ethanol steam reforming is one of the most promising ways to produce hydrogen from biomass, and the goal of this research is to investigate robust, selective and active catalysts for this reaction. In particular, this work is focused on the effect of the different ceria support preparation methods on the Ni active phase stabilization. Two synthetic approaches were evaluated: precipitation (with urea) and microemulsion. The effects of lanthanum doping were investigated too. All catalysts were characterized using N2-physisorption, temperature programmed reduction (TPR), XRD and SEM, to understand the influence of the synthetic approach on the morphological and structural features and their relationship with catalytic properties. Two synthesis methods gave strongly different features. Catalysts prepared by precipitation showed higher reducibility (which involves higher oxygen mobility) and a more homogeneous Ni particle size distribution. Catalytic tests (at 500 °C for 5 h using severe Gas Hourly Space Velocity conditions) revealed also different behaviors. Though the initial conversion (near complete) and H2 yield (60%, i.e., 3.6 mol H2/mol ethanol) were the same, the catalyst prepared by microemulsion was deactivated much faster. Similar trends were found for La-promoted supports. Catalyst deactivation was mainly related to coke deposition as was shown by SEM of the used samples. Higher reducibility of the catalysts prepared by the precipitation method led to a decrease in coke deposition rate by facilitating the removal of coke precursors, which made them the more stable catalysts of the reaction.
Keywords
coke resistance, ethanol steam reforming, lanthanum doping, microemulsion, Ni/CeO2
Suggested Citation
Pizzolitto C, Menegazzo F, Ghedini E, Martínez Arias A, Cortés Corberán V, Signoretto M. Microemulsion vs. Precipitation: Which Is the Best Synthesis of Nickel−Ceria Catalysts for Ethanol Steam Reforming?. (2021). LAPSE:2021.0771
Author Affiliations
Pizzolitto C: CATMAT Lab, Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca’ Foscari University Venice and INSTM RU of Venice, via Torino 155, I-30172 Venezia Mestre, Italy
Menegazzo F: CATMAT Lab, Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca’ Foscari University Venice and INSTM RU of Venice, via Torino 155, I-30172 Venezia Mestre, Italy [ORCID]
Ghedini E: CATMAT Lab, Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca’ Foscari University Venice and INSTM RU of Venice, via Torino 155, I-30172 Venezia Mestre, Italy
Martínez Arias A: Institute of Catalysis and Petroleum Chemistry (ICP), CSIC, Calle Marie Curie 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Cortés Corberán V: Institute of Catalysis and Petroleum Chemistry (ICP), CSIC, Calle Marie Curie 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain [ORCID]
Signoretto M: CATMAT Lab, Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca’ Foscari University Venice and INSTM RU of Venice, via Torino 155, I-30172 Venezia Mestre, Italy [ORCID]
Journal Name
Processes
Volume
9
Issue
1
First Page
pr9010077
Year
2020
Publication Date
2020-12-31
Published Version
ISSN
2227-9717
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: pr9010077, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2021.0771
This Record
External Link

doi:10.3390/pr9010077
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Oct 14, 2021
Main Article
License
CC BY 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
333
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Oct 14, 2021
 
Verified by curator on
Oct 14, 2021
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2021.0771
 
Original Submitter
Calvin Tsay
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version