Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0504
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0504
Decentralized Causal Monitoring in High-Dimensional Systems: Revealing the Topological Drivers behind Fault Detection Performance
July 6, 2026. Originally submitted on June 12, 2026
Abstract
Centralized monitoring methods experience reduced fault detection sensitivity in large-scale industrial systems due to the masking effect arising from the aggregation of many interconnected variables. Decentralized monitoring, where variables are grouped into subsystems, has been shown to effectively address these limitations. However, the performance of this class of methods critically depends on how the network is partitioned, and the role of its structural factors on fault detection remains poorly understood. This work studies how network topology and causal structure affect decentralized monitoring in high-dimensional systems. Using SimCaNet, a DAG-based data simulator, where large-scale systems with 100-1000 variables were generated, we rigorously compared the performance of centralized and decentralized causal log-likelihood monitoring methods under process perturbations and sensor bias faults. Network partitioning is performed using the Leiden community detection algorithm and characterized at the network, community, and node levels. Fault Detection Sensitivity (AUCNORM) is quantified per variable, using the normalized area under the curve, which is computed from the true positive rate profiles across fault magnitudes. Results show that AUCNORM is primarily driven by the number and the size of communities across fault types. Smaller communities consistently achieve higher AUCNORM than larger communities, while excessive fragmentation or high modularity degrade performance. Community density and inter-community coupling further enhance fault detection sensitivity. The strength of node-level causal relationships explains most of the variability observed at root nodes for sensor bias faults and their robustness to information loss. Furthermore, ablation studies confirm the robustness of distributed systems to major disruptions in the system: more than 32% of community information can be removed without significantly impacting the fault detection sensitivity. These topology-driven partitioning findings constitute novel and valuable contributions to the theoretical foundations for designing better distributed monitoring systems in complex industrial plants.
Keywords
Big Data, Community Detection, Decentralized Monitoring, Fault Detection, Industry 4.0, Modelling and Simulations, Network Topology, Structural Causal Models
Suggested Citation
Paredes R, Reis MS. Decentralized Causal Monitoring in High-Dimensional Systems: Revealing the Topological Drivers behind Fault Detection Performance. Systems and Control Transactions 5:2406-2417 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.144303
Author Affiliations
Paredes R: University of Coimbra, CERES, Department of Chemical Engineering, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal [ORCID]
Reis MS: University of Coimbra, CERES, Department of Chemical Engineering, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
2406
Last Page
2417
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Missing column from Table 4 added
Other Meta
PII: 2406-2417-99-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0504
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.144303
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jul 6, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
245
Version History
[v2] (Missing column from Table 4 added)
Jul 6, 2026
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jul 6, 2026
This Version Number
v2
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0504
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Isermann R. Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods-a survey. Automatica 20:387-404 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(84)90098-0
  2. Reis M, Gins G. Industrial process monitoring in the big data/industry 4.0 era: from detection, to diagnosis, to prognosis. Processes 5:35 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr5030035
  3. Ge Z, Song Z. Distributed PCA model for plant-wide process monitoring. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:1947-1957 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301945s
  4. Peng X, Ding SX, Du W, Zhong W, Qian F. Distributed process monitoring based on canonical correlation analysis with partly-connected topology. Control Engineering Practice 101:104500 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104500
  5. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann (1988).
  6. Chiang LH, Jiang B, Zhu X, Huang D, Braatz RD. Diagnosis of multiple and unknown faults using the causal map and multivariate statistics. Journal of Process Control 28:27-39 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.02.004
  7. Paredes R, Rato TJ, Reis MS. Causal network inference and functional decomposition for decentralized statistical process monitoring: detection and diagnosis. Chemical Engineering Science 267:118338 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.118338
  8. Li Y, He J, Chen C, Guan X. Topology inference for network systems: causality perspective and nonasymptotic performance. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 69:3483-3498 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2023.3303816
  9. Newman MEJ. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford Univ. Press (2010) https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001
  10. Traag VA, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing wellconnected communities. Scientific Reports 9:5233 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s4159801941695z
  11. Rato TJ, Reis MS. Markovian and non-markovian sensitivity enhancing transformations for process monitoring. Chemical Engineering Science 163:223-233 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.047
  12. Paredes R, Yang WT, Reis MS. Decentralized causal-based monitoring for large-scale systems: sensitivity and robustness assessment. IFAC-PapersOnLine 59:127-132 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.133
  13. Yang WT, Reis MS, Borodin V, Juge M, Roussy A. An interpretable unsupervised bayesian network model for fault detection and diagnosis. Control Engineering Practice 127:105304 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105304
  14. Paredes R, Reis MS. Causality in process systems engineering: fundamentals, applications, and emerging trends. Computers & Chemical Engineering 203:109345 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109345
(0.08 seconds)

[0.09 s]