Proceedings of ESCAPE 36ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 5 (2026)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2026.0373
Published Article
LAPSE:2026.0373
Evaluation of dual pressure low-temperature distillation for LNG Production in CO2-rich fields
June 12, 2026
Abstract
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) plays a key role in the energy transition, but its production is often limited by the high CO2 content of some reservoirs, which increases operating costs and solidification risks. This study evaluates the dual-pressure low-temperature cryogenic distillation process applied to a recently discovered gas field with a high CO2 content (25%) for LNG production. The critical properties of the gas streams and the process operating conditions were analyzed using Aspen Plus v14. The results indicate that reducing the CO2 concentration throughout the column is essential to prevent solid formation by maintaining a fluid composition with a freezing temperature below the operating temperature of the stages. It was also observed that the reflux affects LNG purity and freezing temperature in all stages. Furthermore, the adoption of a low-pressure separator upstream of the distillation proved crucial to producing condensates within commercial specifications. The work extends the understanding of the dual-pressure low-temperature cryogenic distillation to the 25% CO2 range and highlights the potential of cryogenic distillation to enable LNG production in fields with high CO2 content.
Keywords
CO2, Cryogenic distillation, Gas field, LNG, Simulation
Suggested Citation
Mercado VSV, Noriler D, Tovar LP, Salihuddin RS, Surmi AB, Rahman FH, Silva JFL. Evaluation of dual pressure low-temperature distillation for LNG Production in CO2-rich fields. Systems and Control Transactions 5:1345-1352 (2026) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.158129
Author Affiliations
Mercado VSV: Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Engenharia Química (FEQ), Campinas, SP, Brazil [ORCID]
Noriler D: Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Engenharia Química (FEQ), Campinas, SP, Brazil [ORCID]
Tovar LP: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Instituto de Ciências Ambientais, Químicas e Farmacêuticas (ICAQF), Diadema, SP, Brazil [ORCID]
Salihuddin RS: PETRONAS Research Sdn Bhd, Bangi, Malaysia [ORCID]
Surmi AB: PETRONAS Research Sdn Bhd, Bangi, Malaysia [ORCID]
Rahman FH: PETRONAS Research Sdn Bhd, Bangi, Malaysia [ORCID]
Silva JFL: Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Engenharia Química (FEQ), Campinas, SP, Brazil [ORCID]
[Login] to see author email addresses.
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
5
First Page
1345
Last Page
1352
Year
2026
Publication Date
2026-06-12
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1345-1352-541-SCT-5-2026, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2026.0373
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.158129
Publisher Version
Download
Files
Jun 12, 2026
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
200
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 12, 2026
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 12, 2026
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
http://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2026.0373
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Publisher Version
References Cited
  1. Gürsan C, de Gooyert V. The systemic impact of a transition fuel: does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 138:110552 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552
  2. EIA: Electric Power Monthly - December 2025., Washington (2025).
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: GHG Emission Factors Hub | US EPA, https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub, last accessed 2026/01/08.
  4. EIA: International Energy Statistics, https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/natural-gas/dry-natural-gas-produc-tion?pd=3002&p=00g&u=0&f=A&v=mapbubble&a=&i=none&vo=value&t=C&g=00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001&l=249ruvvvvvfvtvnvv1vrvvvvfvvvvvvfvvvou20evvvvvvvvvvnvvvs0008&s=315532800000&e=1672531200000, last accessed 2026/01/15.
  5. IEA: Electricity generation in World. (2025).
  6. GPSA: GPSA Engineering Data Book. Gas Processors Suppliers Association (2004).
  7. Pellegrini LA, De Guido G, Langè S, Moioli S, Picutti B, Vergani P, Franzoni G, Brignoli F. The potential of a new distillation process for the upgrading of acid gas. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference : (2016) https://doi.org/10.2118/183154-ms
  8. Anugraha RP, Pratiwi VD, Renanto R, Juwari J, Islami AN, Bakhtiar MY. Techno-economic analysis of CO2 cryogenic distillation from high CO2 content gas field: a case study in indonesia. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 202:226-234 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.12.035
  9. Masoudi R, Nayak S, Panting ATP, Hoesni J, Tiranda H, Samsuri MNB, Diah MABM. Geological controls on distribution of CO2 off the coast of sarawak, offshore malaysia: understandings from regional study and petroleum system modeling. Offshore Technology Conference Asia : (2024) https://doi.org/10.4043/34657-ms
  10. Koronful N, Peters K, Ali MF, Skulsangjuntr J, Jiang L, Kleine A, Basu D, Bencomo J, Hernandez J, Brink G. Carbon dioxide in reservoir gases: new insights from basin and petroleum system modeling. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition : (2018) https://doi.org/10.2118/192011-ms
  11. Burgers WFJ, Northrop PS, Kheshgi HS, Valencia JA. Worldwide development potential for sour gas. Energy Procedia 4:2178-2184 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.104
  12. Meyer, L., Walley, D., Sutton, J., Schapper, M.: Abstract: Ca Voi Xanh Field, Block 118, Offshore Da Nang, Vietnam: Exploration Highlights and Development Challenges. 10 (2017).
  13. Watson NM, Zwingmann N, Lemon NM, Tingate PR. ONSHORE OTWAY BASIN CARBON DIOXIDE ACCUMULATIONS: CO2-INDUCED DIAGENESIS IN NATURAL ANALOGUES FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF GREENHOUSE GAS. The APPEA Journal 43:637 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1071/aj02036
  14. Liu J, Zhou H, Pujol M, Selby D, Li J, Tian H. The bitumen formation and re-os characteristics of a co2-rich pre-salt gas reservoir of the kwanza basin, offshore angola. Marine and Petroleum Geology 143:105786 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105786
  15. de Freitas VA, Vital JCS, Rodrigues BR, Rodrigues R. Source rock potential, main depocenters, and CO2 occurrence in the pre-salt section of santos basin, southeast brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 115:103760 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2022.103760
  16. Carlson, E.C.: Don't Gamble With Physical Properties For Simulations. Chem. Eng. Prog. (1996).
  17. De Guido G, Langè S, Moioli S, Pellegrini LA. Thermodynamic method for the prediction of solid CO2 formation from multicomponent mixtures. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 92:70-79 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.08.001
  18. NAGAHAMA K, KONISHI H, HOSHINO D, HIRATA M. BINARY VAPOR-LIQUID EQUILIBRIA OF CARBON DIOXIDE-LIGHT HYDROCARBONS AT LOW TEMPERATURE. J. Chem. Eng. Japan / JCEJ 7:323-328 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.7.323
  19. Webster LA, Kidnay AJ. Vapor?liquid equilibria for the methane?propane?carbon dioxide systems at 230 k and 270 k. J. Chem. Eng. Data 46:759-764 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1021/je000307d
  20. Ohgaki K, Katayama T. Isothermal vapor-liquid equilibrium data for the ethane-carbon dioxide system at high pressures. Fluid Phase Equilibria 1:27-32 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(77)80023-x
  21. ZareNezhad B. Prediction of CO2 freezing points for the mixtures of CO2-CH4 at cryogenic conditions of NGL extraction plants. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 23:827-831 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02705935
  22. Brown TS, Sloan ED, Kidnay AJ. Vapor-liquid equilibria in the nitrogen + carbon dioxide + ethane system. Fluid Phase Equilibria 51:299-313 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(89)80372-3
  23. Le TT, Trebble MA. Measurement of carbon dioxide freezing in mixtures of methane, ethane, and nitrogen in the solid?vapor equilibrium region. J. Chem. Eng. Data 52:683-686 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1021/je060194j
  24. Neumann A, Walch W. Dampf/flüssigkeits?gleichgewicht co2/ch4 im bereich tiefer temperaturen und kleiner co2?molenbrüche. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 40:241-244 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.330400509
  25. Wei MSW, Brown TS, Kidnay AJ, Sloan ED. Vapor + liquid equilibria for the ternary system methane + ethane + carbon dioxide at 230 k and its constituent binaries at temperatures from 207 to 270 k. J. Chem. Eng. Data 40:726-731 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1021/je00020a002
  26. El-Banbi A, Alzahabi A, El-Maraghi A. Dry gases. PVT Property Correlations :29-63 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-812572-4.00003-5
  27. Xu X, Chen H, Liu C, Dang C. Prediction of the binary interaction parameter of carbon dioxide/alkanes mixtures in the pseudocritical region. ACS Omega 4:13279-13294 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01450
  28. Chueh PL, Prausnitz JM. Vapor?liquid equilibria at high pressures: calculation of partial molar volumes in nonpolar liquid mixtures. AIChE Journal 13:1099-1107 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690130612
  29. Stewart M, Arnold K. Crude stabilization. Emulsions and Oil Treating Equipment :81-106 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-8970-0.00002-5
  30. ASTM: Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products (Reid Method), ASTM D323 - 20a. (2020).
  31. Pribylov AA, Skibitskaya NA, Zekel´ LA. Methane solubility in liquid hydrocarbons at high pressure. Russ Chem Bull 64:841-845 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-015-0942-2
  32. Shashi Menon E. Physical properties. Transmission Pipeline Calculations and Simulations Manual :29-82 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-85617-830-3.00003-1
  33. GPSA: GPSA Engineering Data Book. Gas Processors Suppliers Association, Paris (1998).
  34. Lastari, F.: Ryan-Holmes and Modified Ryan-Holmes Processes for LNG Production Fonny Lastari. (2009).
  35. Haut RC, Denton RD, Thomas ER. Development and application of the controlled-freeze-zone process. SPE Production Engineering 4:265-271 (1989) https://doi.org/10.2118/17700-pa
(0.09 seconds)

[0.1 s]